update...
his score per minute was just over 22000 when i last looked
his score per minute was just over 22000 when i last looked
I doubt you could find anyone in the top ten that hasnt cheated.
You don't get reset if you get padded. Only the padders.moose_rider wrote:
If I get reseted for doing absolutely nothing I will be soooo pissed. Why does this happen to ME!!! did he hack my account or was it just a random person thing. OMG this sucks. I dont pad I got a kills streak of 44 and a best round score of 280, I would suck at padding.
just not on leader boards there yet.. but lookG-Force wrote:
I think it might be a little prank that bf2s pulled because there not on bf2tracker http://bf2tracker.com/bf2_leaderboards.php?action=score
http://bf2tracker.com/bf2_userprofile.p … ;bfmodid=0
http://bf2player.com/index.php?page=sta … t=49562902
Global Score: 876,639,453 lol..
I guess ppl dont believe the sreens hots i posted or what I said.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Um dude, I think your mistaken. You wont find someone in the top ten who has a girl friend, job, car (LIFE).numbnuts wrote:
I doubt you could find anyone in the top ten that hasnt cheated.
Lol jks im sure these people do have some of the following
Negatory, reset stats does not equal reset awards nor favorite victim/worst enemy status.HansMeiser wrote:
bs
the accounts of those guys are goin to disappear pretty fast and so will your favourite victim
i wouldnt worry at all about it
telonsean doesn't cheat I can say that knowing it's the truth, though he has no life outside of bf2 either. (He works at home and when ehs not working hes playing bf2.)numbnuts wrote:
I doubt you could find anyone in the top ten that hasnt cheated.
That can't be statpadding, spm are way too high. It seems more like a commander glitch/bug, because both have their highscores from commanding, and I heard before that somebody also had a commanderscore of 16000 because of any bug. But it's interesting that it happened to 2 players of the same clan......
maybe they were on their server (see earlier screenshot) as opposing commanders and they both got a point boost? idunno how the glitch works, so... yehalf.ha wrote:
I heard before that somebody also had a commanderscore of 16000 because of any bug. But it's interesting that it happened to 2 players of the same clan......
yeah thats strange maybe another 1 april joke :S
Guys remember glopje? He got his by this commander bug and got a shitload of commander points in a couple of rounds. Ea wiped his stats cause he abused the bug/glitch to get more points. I think these guys are doing the same thing.
My question is what is this bug and how does it work... Not that i want to try it im just curious
well if you look at his stats hes earning around 22,000 points a minutewhich is humanly impossible unless he is using a glitch or hacking.
Dear God please let my karma one day reach 100, whether it be tomorrow or 1000 years in the future i want it to happen.
um this is soooo april fools. a its impossible to get that much - these guys came out of nowhere. are they on the offical ea ranking system yet?i havent checked but if there not then yes its a hoax and your all crying about nothing. and....if it isnt a hoax then they disappear very soon indeed
It's not april fools you nub, look in BFHQ or BF2Player.
Yay.
hax atw
Are they hacking or what? cause i dont think u can stat pad that fast.
doesnt it strike anyone as strange that the best round score of 65,535???
65535 is quite a significant number within computers.............
65535 is quite a significant number within computers.............
How is it significant?8ball wrote:
doesnt it strike anyone as strange that the best round score of 65,535???
65535 is quite a significant number within computers.............
Also, what is this commander bug that gives him over 4000 points in a round? I don't want to use it because it's so obvious, it's like an instant stat-wipe. I just want to know how the hell they're doing this??
I mean, everyone knows the boat - flip, knife - revive, etc. stat-padding techniques, but they don't use them...
The reason the number seems so special is because it is FFFF in Hex. That is why the maximum number of rows in excel is 65535, the programers used a 4 bit register to define the row number. So the 10th row would be 000A (in computers memory, hex) or row 65535 is (FFFF). You can do conversions using the calculator on your computer. If this number is maximum for anything dealing with computers, I would gurantee it is because it was written using 4 bit registers.
Important things to notice are as follows:
-[C.E.A]-*Sinkope has a Global Score 16,777,215 which is approx 256 * 65535
-[C.E.A]-Dragon has a Global Score 6,585,191 which is approx 100 * 65535
BOTH -[C.E.A]-*Sinkope and -[C.E.A]-Dragon have best round scores of 65535
Those boys are genius....!
If anyone is interested in exactly how the glitch works then you can e-mail me sophos@stylewar.co.uk
More Info:
65535 is off
65535 is the maximum
65535 is assumed
65535 is used because no conversion will occur at the time of an
65535 is received
65535 is considered to be completely opaque
65535 is not possible in our environment
65535 is also used for fragmented packets
65535 is that kernel 2
65535 is the maximum"
65535 is used here
65535 is acceptable in this case because new database files are created based on the qlangid value of enu
65535 is a special rule
65535 is not less than 65535
65535 is also not decremented and will remain on until the timer is set to zero
65535 is the highest rwin you can use without windows scaling being turned on
65535 is a default entry
65535 is inverted
65535 is 1111 1111 1111 1111 in binary
65535 is displayed as white
65535 is not defined
65535 is available for user
65535 is the highest;; ``signed'' order
65535 is the maximum volume
65535 is not all that much slower on old cards and 256 color mode is actually slower on some of the new cards
65535 is not all that much slower on most video cards and is in fact faster on newer hardware
65535 is relatively rare and is commonly hostile in nature
65535 is the default rule
65535 is a number that many bios manufactures use to disable this feature if the value 'none' is not present
65535 is the highest score
65535 is supposed to be the 'nobody' user/group id
65535 is equal to 2^16 1
65535 is valid
65535 is needed since the first rule isn't inclusive and you can't use 65536 as a bound
65535 is placed in the first column of output 8 and the remaining data in this row is set to zero
65535 is the highest total you can
65535 is required
65535 is basically the same as
65535 is the highest id
65535 is kind of like 0
65535 is too big for an integer
65535 is a very bad choice of uid and gid is that it casts to
65535 is a full circle
65535 is reached
65535 is
65535 is the maximum value of video
65535 is 16
65535 is flagdefects flag
65535 is equivalent to end
65535 is max
65535 is deze 0
65535 is roughly 2gb
65535 is returned
65535 is too large
65535 is the highest value that you can set your rwin to
65535 is included in the image header record
65535 is fully opaque
65535 is administratively predefined and cannot be modified
65535 is living there
65535 is the maximum delay
65535 is a number that the bios will accept to disable this feature
65535 is followed by 0
65535 is bright
65535 is white
65535 is a tight squeeze at best
65535 is 39320 while python says 39321
65535 is returned when
65535 is a special control port for programming the ds100/em100 from the network side
65535 is identical to ucs
65535 is a 16
Important things to notice are as follows:
-[C.E.A]-*Sinkope has a Global Score 16,777,215 which is approx 256 * 65535
-[C.E.A]-Dragon has a Global Score 6,585,191 which is approx 100 * 65535
BOTH -[C.E.A]-*Sinkope and -[C.E.A]-Dragon have best round scores of 65535
Those boys are genius....!
If anyone is interested in exactly how the glitch works then you can e-mail me sophos@stylewar.co.uk
More Info:
65535 is off
65535 is the maximum
65535 is assumed
65535 is used because no conversion will occur at the time of an
65535 is received
65535 is considered to be completely opaque
65535 is not possible in our environment
65535 is also used for fragmented packets
65535 is that kernel 2
65535 is the maximum"
65535 is used here
65535 is acceptable in this case because new database files are created based on the qlangid value of enu
65535 is a special rule
65535 is not less than 65535
65535 is also not decremented and will remain on until the timer is set to zero
65535 is the highest rwin you can use without windows scaling being turned on
65535 is a default entry
65535 is inverted
65535 is 1111 1111 1111 1111 in binary
65535 is displayed as white
65535 is not defined
65535 is available for user
65535 is the highest;; ``signed'' order
65535 is the maximum volume
65535 is not all that much slower on old cards and 256 color mode is actually slower on some of the new cards
65535 is not all that much slower on most video cards and is in fact faster on newer hardware
65535 is relatively rare and is commonly hostile in nature
65535 is the default rule
65535 is a number that many bios manufactures use to disable this feature if the value 'none' is not present
65535 is the highest score
65535 is supposed to be the 'nobody' user/group id
65535 is equal to 2^16 1
65535 is valid
65535 is needed since the first rule isn't inclusive and you can't use 65536 as a bound
65535 is placed in the first column of output 8 and the remaining data in this row is set to zero
65535 is the highest total you can
65535 is required
65535 is basically the same as
65535 is the highest id
65535 is kind of like 0
65535 is too big for an integer
65535 is a very bad choice of uid and gid is that it casts to
65535 is a full circle
65535 is reached
65535 is
65535 is the maximum value of video
65535 is 16
65535 is flagdefects flag
65535 is equivalent to end
65535 is max
65535 is deze 0
65535 is roughly 2gb
65535 is returned
65535 is too large
65535 is the highest value that you can set your rwin to
65535 is included in the image header record
65535 is fully opaque
65535 is administratively predefined and cannot be modified
65535 is living there
65535 is the maximum delay
65535 is a number that the bios will accept to disable this feature
65535 is followed by 0
65535 is bright
65535 is white
65535 is a tight squeeze at best
65535 is 39320 while python says 39321
65535 is returned when
65535 is a special control port for programming the ds100/em100 from the network side
65535 is identical to ucs
65535 is a 16
Last edited by Sophoz (2006-04-02 09:12:48)
Also - BLAZIN UK DID EXPLOIT HIS WAS TO THE TOP!!!!!
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:iWP … k&cd=1
look for references to 65535 which dont quite add up (MEDIC SCORES HINT HINT)
AND YET ANOTHER GLITCHER
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:_mD … k&cd=2
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:iWP … k&cd=1
look for references to 65535 which dont quite add up (MEDIC SCORES HINT HINT)
AND YET ANOTHER GLITCHER
http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:_mD … k&cd=2
I emailed you Sophoz.
If you google search for CEA Battlefield 2, this is the webpage you get
http://www.bfcea.com/
google attempted to translate that spanish garbage, and this is the address for that
http://translate.google.com/translate?h … l%26sa%3DG
if you scroll down through the translation, you can kind of make sense of some things
"Also I want to clarify that we have not used any cheto. We have altered the original archives of the game, neither used no external application nor na of na. Single we have discovered bug of the game, and we have taken advantage of him to ridicule to EA."
basically they're saying that they altered parts of the game to make EA look bad. What assholes. get a life
http://www.bfcea.com/
google attempted to translate that spanish garbage, and this is the address for that
http://translate.google.com/translate?h … l%26sa%3DG
if you scroll down through the translation, you can kind of make sense of some things
"Also I want to clarify that we have not used any cheto. We have altered the original archives of the game, neither used no external application nor na of na. Single we have discovered bug of the game, and we have taken advantage of him to ridicule to EA."
basically they're saying that they altered parts of the game to make EA look bad. What assholes. get a life