Internet IQ tests are irrelevant: normally speaking there should be very few people with iq's over 130 but it seems that everybody on this forum has a 130+ from some website. stop posting your internet iq scores cause they don't mean anything when everybody gets those scores.
Clear! You're good to go!
If I take an IQ test on a bad day I would get a downy score. If I take it on a very good day I could do do reasonably well. If I take it a few times on both bad days and good days and see were they both average out to wouldn't that be a much more accurate measure of someones intelligence than a single test.
On a sidnote I slept through my SATS and got a 900 I wrote down anything and then went to sleep in the test room. A single fuck was not given that day.
I've never taken one. I wouldn't trust an internet one especially one that charges you $3.99 to take the test from them. (your link). Anyway as IQ test go wouldn't you need to take several test in order to get a good idea of someones intelligence?Spark wrote:
Scores: Scientology *gasp* one: 144
High IQ society: 133
If I take an IQ test on a bad day I would get a downy score. If I take it on a very good day I could do do reasonably well. If I take it a few times on both bad days and good days and see were they both average out to wouldn't that be a much more accurate measure of someones intelligence than a single test.
On a sidnote I slept through my SATS and got a 900 I wrote down anything and then went to sleep in the test room. A single fuck was not given that day.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7131
I think IQ tests measure something that isn't so affected by state-of-mind. Otherwise why give babies the test?
141 when I took the test distracted...
internet scores are always inflated
internet scores are always inflated
supposedly I got 158 as a baby o.oSuperior Mind wrote:
I think IQ tests measure something that isn't so affected by state-of-mind. Otherwise why give babies the test?
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7131
That means u r a genie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jinn
Last edited by Superior Mind (2011-12-16 21:05:30)
Did one at Loughborough - run by the University, didn't give an IQ figure but put me in the top 2-5% of University graduates.
Which just proves University graduates aren't that clever.
Which just proves University graduates aren't that clever.
Fuck Israel
no shit. it's not the 1880's. also 'university graduate' is a bit of an open term, isn't it? could be a media studies student (shudder). as i said it's hardly as if universities are only and exclusively bastions of academic excellence nowadays. probably 75% intake of all universities are for completely unchallenging subjects and 'career' based investments. that's what happens in the era of education marketization.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Except my Masters wasn't nowadays
Fuck Israel
i don't even know what that means.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
They used to be.as i said it's hardly as if universities are only and exclusively bastions of academic excellence nowadays
Fuck Israel
so they still can be. just an 'average' is always going to bring scores down, isn't it? my point was that definitions of 'university' have opened up in the last 40 hours, not that the top-end universities are teaching easier courses (which is what you're implying, which is convenient and dick-stroking for you, isn't it?)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/