stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7196|California

I want to load my Titan with C4, Mines, and EMP grenades and go Mech scraping
livingstorm
Member
+8|7149
This will all be fun but u guys have given away the tking game plan. They will nerf these ideas now and the 15th patch should hopefully bring them all back again.
livingstorm
Member
+8|7149
can u reverse titans up 2 one another and just let the troops jump from one to the other. There u are 64 players in a 10m or 20m space.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7141|NT, like Mick Dundee

mikkel wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

BF2142 is not a new game if it uses the fucking BF2 engine which is already more than a year old. Whoever thinks this is anything but extortion is a dimwit.
The content matters. Not the engine.
That is like saying that Call of Duty was the same as Quake 3.... My memory is dodgy but I thought that CoD used the Q3 engine...

Last edited by Flecco (2006-05-09 21:19:52)

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
mikkel
Member
+383|7077

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

mikkel wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

BF2142 is not a new game if it uses the fucking BF2 engine which is already more than a year old. Whoever thinks this is anything but extortion is a dimwit.
By the same token, buying Half-Life 1 would be extortion if you had Quake 1 already.

The content matters. Not the engine.
You shouldn't compare apples and oranges. BF2142 is being developped by the same company. The content will NOT be vastly different to their previous game. How different could it be? BF2 was released LAST YEAR... are you telling me within that time Dice came up with a product that will blow BF2 out of the water in every way? That is laughable.

Quakewars actually has alot of timespan between Return to Castle Wolfenstein: ET and its release. Just by this it seems QW:ET will be a better game.

And I don't know where you got your information but Half Life doesn't use the Quake 1 engine either.
Y'know, seeing as how there'll be absolutely no BF2 content in BF2142 save for perhaps relics like the Zero wreckages on Wake in BF2, I think it's safe to say that the content won't only be vastly different, but completely different. Different gamemodes, different weapons, different maps, different layout, different everything. I don't get where you draw the parallels, unless you're fixated on genre, which just makes it all the more laughable.

As for Half-Life 1, I can assure you that it is most certainly built on the Quake 1 engine.
SamLoomis
Member
+3|7075
I'll buy it when it comes out, futuristic warfare has always excited me... can't wait to squash infantry with mecs etc...
Defiance
Member
+438|7147

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

mikkel wrote:

<{SoE}>Agamemnar wrote:

BF2142 is not a new game if it uses the fucking BF2 engine which is already more than a year old. Whoever thinks this is anything but extortion is a dimwit.
By the same token, buying Half-Life 1 would be extortion if you had Quake 1 already.

The content matters. Not the engine.
You shouldn't compare apples and oranges. BF2142 is being developped by the same company. The content will NOT be vastly different to their previous game. How different could it be? BF2 was released LAST YEAR... are you telling me within that time Dice came up with a product that will blow BF2 out of the water in every way? That is laughable.

Quakewars actually has alot of timespan between Return to Castle Wolfenstein: ET and its release. Just by this it seems QW:ET will be a better game.

And I don't know where you got your information but Half Life doesn't use the Quake 1 engine either.
Ahem, the Half Life 1 engine was a licensed version of the Quake 1 engine. It was heavily modified and tweaked, but it was an offcially licensed version of the Quake 1 engine.

Half Life and Quake were very very VERY DIFFERENT!

The same thing was done in HL2 with "Havok," the HL2 Source coders started with Havok 1, modified it to all hell moreso then the quake engine, and Havok bought it back or something and it's now Havok 2.

Last edited by Defiance (2006-05-10 21:45:36)

ThundergodTyLor
You am dee best!
+34|7172|RCM Headquarters

SamLoomis wrote:

I'll buy it when it comes out, futuristic warfare has always excited me... can't wait to squash infantry with mecs etc...
mec?
https://www.battlefield2.info/images/infos/klassen/mec/assault_2_k_of.jpg


mech!
https://www.3drt.com/3dm/mech/mech02_03.jpg

Last edited by ThundergodTyLor (2006-05-10 22:21:53)

ViP.ShooTa
Member
+6|7226
hmm bf2142 - Is it just me or is this MECHWARRIOR????

now mechwarrior was a great game - and thankfully wasnt driven (nefed) by tards
however 2142 is doomed - why EA listens too much to the masses and sadly not enough to commited gamers

just read the total bf2 boards -- oh and anything MYIS

but thats IMHO
however i may buy it as MECHWARRIOR was ace and i WILL BE A MECHWHORE or MEGA WHORE

nice titan driving there soldier -100
coreinflames
Member
+12|7121
I want my ro-bot, to be completley disabled in a wheel chair, with a shotgun and hand grenades, that'd be cool... all my ro-bot will beable to say is "hell breaks loose when they point and laugh at me"

14) complaints*   You're retarted ro-bot is camping my intergelatic space station.
CrazeD
Member
+368|7149|Maine
It's being made by DICE/EA... therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE to be perfect.
CrazeD
Member
+368|7149|Maine
Whoever -1 karmed me, made me laugh. Don't be stereotypical? I'm not..

Look at the past.. all the BF series required several patches, because they suck at coding. There is soooo many bugs in BF2. I think there's more flaws in BF2 than windows v3.1.

And then, they're using the BF2 engine in BF2142. The same engine with all these bugs. Pointless..
Stomper_40k
Re-Incarnation. You mean re-spawn right?
+44|7122|Cardiff - Wales - UK

King_County_Downy wrote:

I haven't read much about it. Will it have frickin' LAZERS Mr Bigglezworth
No lazers but the game rifles will be electronic which means you can jam infantry weapons with an EMP granade.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard