BF2S Forums New Vehicle Suggestions....

How about an AC-130H or AC-130U?

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/ac-130.htm

WilhelmSissener wrote:

sursparxalot wrote:

Wheres the F-14 anyways? It sure seems to be missing in our arsenal and would probly be a lot better than the flying bathtub i mean F-35B.

just read today that the F-14 and F-117 are getting taken out of service, the F-14  almost completley out already and the F-117 by 2008 two of my personal favourites

[b]F-14 taking off (i hope that was not the landing)
ohh and i got it from http://www.patricksaviation.com/aviatio … s/628/F-14 patricks aviation
http://www.patricksaviation.com/uploads … 00629.jpeg

F-117
got it from the same site
http://www.patricksaviation.com/aviatio … 1293/F-117
http://www.patricksaviation.com/uploads … 01294.jpeg

actually they are still going to have the F-117, they said they were going to take the B-2 out but they didn't, and the F-117 is too vaulable and had to good of a service to take out and can you please site your source for this info?

I want a purple pimp caddy with velvet seats a loud stereo and quad 50 mounted on the trunk

10 speed

C-130h?

.

i think that the C130 would carry too much people and if u wanna have a tank, well u better be ready because a good coordinated attack will probably destroy any opposition. planes that are too big will kill the game. the same goes for the b2 bomber. in some bf2 maps tanks and guys have already a serious problems with the f-15s cluster bombs.
of course that if we add a bombing to the commanders artillery then it could be possible to see a B2 or B52 cruising the air and delivering death...

I want any of these dinky planes

Especially the first one

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgur … safe%3Doff

Imagine the usmc having them on wake. It would give those J10s a hard time.

daffytag wrote:

I want any of these dinky planes

Especially the first one

http://images.google.co.uk/imgres?imgur … safe%3Doff

Imagine the usmc having them on wake. It would give those J10s a hard time.

YES!!!

Nighthawk heli for sf

hehe I`d like to see..hm... A landraider:D or leman russ....u know warhammer 40 k
but something big, like a huge transport or something. and yeah u know that artytank from DC:D that was awesome! dont remember its name though... or why not that large transportplane, a hercules or something!
one of those flying things, hangglider to SF
now I`m out:)
beers

What you want ,but don't even realize, is the US Marine Corps AAAV.  Advanced Amphibious Assault  Vehicle.  Finishing final testing and design in 2006-2007, we have been told that it will start entering the fleet in 2007.  It is replacing the AAV originally produced in 1976. 

With a crew of three, a 30 mm bushwhacker cannon, with the most advanced targeting system for any armed vehicle, it will do over 25 knots in the water, weighing in over 72,000 pounds!  Fully loaded with 18 combat ready Marines, and hitting any beach from "over the horizon".  In water mode the hull is almost boat like, then coming up to shore, just like a transformer toy the tracks deploy and it hits the beach!  Powered by an engine with over 2500 HP, she  can reach speeds over 65 mph!

            Comparison of Selected AAAV Requirements
                    With AAV's Current Capabilities
Function                            AAAV requirement    AAV capability
------------------------------  ------------------  ------------------
Water speed                     23-29 miles per     6-8 miles per hour
Cross-country land speed   Keep up with main   15-20 miles per
                                        battle tank, which  hour
                                        travels at about
                                        30 miles per hour
Range on water                  65 miles             45 miles
Range on land                   300 miles            300 miles
Troop-carrying capacity      18 combat-          18 combat-
                                        equipped troops     equipped troops
Survivability (armor           Survive 14.5mm      Can only survive
protection)                        bullets without      14.5mm bullets if
                                       attaching enhanced  enhanced armor
                                       armor plating to    plating has been
                                       vehicle's hull      attached to vehicle's hull
Lethality (main armament)       Defeat light        40mm and .50
                                             armored combat      caliber machine
                                             vehicles of 2005-   guns, which cannot
                                             2025 time frame     defeat light
                                             during day and      armored combat
                                             night while moving  vehicles of today

AAV: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ … 1-pics.htm
AAAV: http://www.efv.usmc.mil/

So what do you think?