i think if ea wants anymore of our money they will make the newest patch that is prety much version 1.22 or anything before 1.3 its probly a dumb idea but i was thinking thats the only way to save the game we have put so much time into.
We won't disagree.
We'll just tell you to search.
We'll just tell you to search.
Come again???
Explain it to me like I am a simpleton... Because... I am.
I haven't got a clue what you are talking about...
R
Errmm... I agree...
WHO GAVE ME -1 WITHOUT REASON?!?!?!?!?
WHO GAVE ME -1 WITHOUT REASON?!?!?!?!?
Last edited by Jussimies (2006-05-28 09:45:32)
Your sentence structure makes no sense.
I don't think EA really has much obligation to us. If they want to make lots of money then they will make a game that people will like. But it is THEIR game...not OURS.
Anyone catch my drift?
I don't think EA really has much obligation to us. If they want to make lots of money then they will make a game that people will like. But it is THEIR game...not OURS.
Anyone catch my drift?
lol ok ea #%$^#$ up the game right? well they put out a new patch just like 1.22 or 1.21 and forget about cartillary and stupid stuff like that. get it now?=Robin-Hood= wrote:
Come again???
Explain it to me like I am a simpleton... Because... I am.
I haven't got a clue what you are talking about...
R
im so geting -1 for this...... keep in mind people its just an idea
Last edited by Madhadda1 (2006-05-28 09:30:55)
Well...
That makes more sense.
I'll add it to the complain section because you are probably so !é"!ç'(§&éè§'! right
Cheers mate,
R
That makes more sense.
I'll add it to the complain section because you are probably so !é"!ç'(§&éè§'! right
Cheers mate,
R
é"!ç'(§&éè§'!
I gotta post more so I can start sharing +K with people...:thumbsup:
I think if EA wants more money they can allow players to pay to play ranked on a desired patch. The most popular patch will cost the most and the latest patch will be free. Meh...
in my mind that would absolutly ruin bf2. i know MMOs do this but i really dont want to start paying to play bf2 that way i want to if ive been doing it for free (after the $50) from the beginning. and how would they know what patch to have PTP on. some people might like .103. some 1.22 some people even like 1.3.SysTray wrote:
I think if EA wants more money they can allow players to pay to play ranked on a desired patch. The most popular patch will cost the most and the latest patch will be free. Meh...
1. there would just be no way to do this and 2. it would turn many people off of bf2
+1Boomerjinks wrote:
Your sentence structure makes no sense.
I don't think EA really has much obligation to us. If they want to make lots of money then they will make a game that people will like. But it is THEIR game...not OURS.
Anyone catch my drift?
EDIT:Im in a good mood, -1 polarbearz, +1 for poster, lol.
Last edited by kmk-1605 (2006-05-28 20:41:18)
ROFL. Thank you MadHatta for another pointless, and useless post!!polarbearz wrote:
We won't disagree.
We'll just tell you to search.
Bring back the black hawk! W00T!
i want kills for my artillary strikes
You get kills for them .. they just don;t count during thr ound. They add towards your global kills.Gladiator08 wrote:
i want kills for my artillary strikes
It's useless and pointless, yet soothing...Jo Barf Creepy wrote:
ROFL. Thank you MadHatta for another pointless, and useless post!!polarbearz wrote:
We won't disagree.
We'll just tell you to search.
yeah i'm in. And bring the bunny hopping back.. not dolphin diving thats a little to much{M5}Sniper3 wrote:
Bring back the black hawk! W00T!
LolJussimies wrote:
Errmm... I agree...
WHO GAVE ME -1 WITHOUT REASON?!?!?!?!?
I'll give u a "+1 out of feeling sorry for u"
if it said weener, it was probably r00ki...
i disagree
why should they get more money? they got urs already, besides what happened to all the people that complained about 1.2? tweaking the pkm, sniper and AA, reducing rail gun power, chopper missiles.....
Correct me, if i'm wrong, but i doubt they made less money during the last three months, then before, with a similar period of time.
people got used to 1.22, they will adapt to 1.3, i also think u won't complain, if squad hopping(+other changes) wasn't ment to be in the game from the day one of the demo.
why should they get more money? they got urs already, besides what happened to all the people that complained about 1.2? tweaking the pkm, sniper and AA, reducing rail gun power, chopper missiles.....
Correct me, if i'm wrong, but i doubt they made less money during the last three months, then before, with a similar period of time.
people got used to 1.22, they will adapt to 1.3, i also think u won't complain, if squad hopping(+other changes) wasn't ment to be in the game from the day one of the demo.
Manbreasts.
lmao.....yeh "Manbreasts"....thats going in my sig!polarbearz wrote:
Manbreasts.
GL Andy
who is andy?!
Adapt to 1.3? Many of us can't play for any length of time thanks to this fantastic patch. Yes, I've gone through the uninstall, then re-install in a particular order. I did notice a performance difference in that the game can now crash to desktop faster than before the reinstall. On the rare occasion that I'm actually allowed to join a map on a server, one of two things happen after 3 or so minutes of the hard drive going nuts: CTD or game runs smooth as silk until the next map is loaded at which point I'm provided with a view of my desktop.doxy wrote:
.......
people got used to 1.22, they will adapt to 1.3, i also think u won't complain, if squad hopping(+other changes) wasn't ment to be in the game from the day one of the demo.