pun intended?mKmalfunction wrote:
It is a good boredom killer though.Munson.AUS wrote:
Ok good.
Because Gallipoli was Britains fault.
Its not like we decided to just charge ay machine gun fire because we were bored.
I think he was calling Aussies boring. Quick, someone give him a machine gun so we can charge him!
yeah I sense it as well.Bubbalo wrote:
But if you believe the war is illegal and immoral, it would not be right to support it. I sense this going the same way as one or two similar discussions we've had..............lowing wrote:
No, I say when a country is at war, support the war effort, keep up the morale of your troops and let them know you stand behind them, and let history be the judge of your actions. right or wrong we are at war and it must be won. It will be won by a fighting spirit, not by a bunch of people protesting their efforts to protect us.
How can anyone deem this war immoral and illegal without knowing all the facts about it??
ALL the facts mind you, not what the media is feeding you.
I don't think there is anything immoral about removing that piece of shit murderer and genocidal madman. If you think it is immoral I will assume that you didn't live under his rule.
the war is legal since it was approved by the UN 15 years when it was started.
I guess that goes along with the theory of over powering your enemy if you have enough of the items. Like the U.S. thought if they had enough Shermans, they would have enough to be able to fight the superior Panzers with no trouble. Maybe they thought if they had enough people to charge the nest with, the enemy would eventually run out of bullets and tehy wuld be da win!!!!!111!!!!1!Bubbalo wrote:
I think he was calling Aussies boring. Quick, someone give him a machine gun so we can charge him!
The media is in the center, dude. They've reported tons of both pro and non-war stories. To you it seems biased, but it's not in reality.lowing wrote:
yeah I sense it as well.Bubbalo wrote:
But if you believe the war is illegal and immoral, it would not be right to support it. I sense this going the same way as one or two similar discussions we've had..............lowing wrote:
No, I say when a country is at war, support the war effort, keep up the morale of your troops and let them know you stand behind them, and let history be the judge of your actions. right or wrong we are at war and it must be won. It will be won by a fighting spirit, not by a bunch of people protesting their efforts to protect us.
How can anyone deem this war immoral and illegal without knowing all the facts about it??
ALL the facts mind you, not what the media is feeding you.
I don't think there is anything immoral about removing that piece of shit murderer and genocidal madman. If you think it is immoral I will assume that you didn't live under his rule.
the war is legal since it was approved by the UN 15 years when it was started.
Really? then why am I hearing different reports from the media ( which is negative ) from those told by the people who have or are serving over there??Spearhead wrote:
The media is in the center, dude. They've reported tons of both pro and non-war stories. To you it seems biased, but it's not in reality.lowing wrote:
yeah I sense it as well.Bubbalo wrote:
But if you believe the war is illegal and immoral, it would not be right to support it. I sense this going the same way as one or two similar discussions we've had..............
How can anyone deem this war immoral and illegal without knowing all the facts about it??
ALL the facts mind you, not what the media is feeding you.
I don't think there is anything immoral about removing that piece of shit murderer and genocidal madman. If you think it is immoral I will assume that you didn't live under his rule.
the war is legal since it was approved by the UN 15 years when it was started.
As I said before, we don't have to prove that the media is biased, Dan Rather did it for us when he chose to run the Air Guard story based on documents he knew to be forged,
In the interest of international warm and fuzziness, this is my Swedish friend Lars, and his bitchin Mustang fastback that will be featured in an upcoming issue of Mustang Monthly.......oh yeah, Mustang=T-5 in Germany
In the interest of international warm and fuzziness, this is my Swedish friend Lars, and his bitchin Mustang fastback that will be featured in an upcoming issue of Mustang Monthly.......oh yeah, Mustang=T-5 in Germany
Same question crossed my mind....Jinto-sk wrote:
How old are you before I comment[bpuk]jack wrote:
I admire the gun - ho way of the americans and i like President Bush :-) think he does great things even if he isn't all that bright. The USA (I dont care what anyone says) supplied many of the troops for Iraq and initiated teh conflict in which Britain stood firm as an ally.
I have to support teh military actions of out nations because I'm going into the RAF.
God bless the link our nations share and lets hope it continues to rid this world of hatred and tyranny
Because it's the army's job to make sure it's soldiers believe that they're doing the right thing and they're winning.lowing wrote:
Really? then why am I hearing different reports from the media ( which is negative ) from those told by the people who have or are serving over there??
After some neg points from this thread, let me rephrase:unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Liberals are taking it to us...one -karma at a time.[bpuk]jack wrote:
obviously someone didnt agree with me on my views and gave me a -1 with the reason being "your a fool"
Is it any coincidence that the majority of my negative score comes from debate and serious talk? Oh dear...I'd better stop posting conservative views, or that bad old -karma will annoy me.Liberals are taking it to us...one anonymous pussy -karma at a time.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-06-11 03:17:35)
15 matePekkaA wrote:
Same question crossed my mind....Jinto-sk wrote:
How old are you before I comment[bpuk]jack wrote:
I admire the gun - ho way of the americans and i like President Bush :-) think he does great things even if he isn't all that bright. The USA (I dont care what anyone says) supplied many of the troops for Iraq and initiated teh conflict in which Britain stood firm as an ally.
I have to support teh military actions of out nations because I'm going into the RAF.
God bless the link our nations share and lets hope it continues to rid this world of hatred and tyranny
good luck and god speed, be carefull over there if you get in a bad way shoot first then sort it out after (desert storm vet) i was there ,it really does suck!!
So do mine. And I rarely sign karma, negative or positive, because then you get the same back, which just seems stupid. Fact is, if you have a strong viewpoint, you're more likely to get negative karma than positive karma. That doesn't mean I'm going to insult conservatives.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
After some neg points from this thread, let me rephrase:Is it any coincidence that the majority of my negative score comes from debate and serious talk? Oh dear...I'd better stop posting conservative views, or that bad old -karma will annoy me.Liberals are taking it to us...one anonymous pussy -karma at a time.
We know Bubbalo.......you are an angel..Bubbalo wrote:
So do mine. And I rarely sign karma, negative or positive, because then you get the same back, which just seems stupid. Fact is, if you have a strong viewpoint, you're more likely to get negative karma than positive karma. That doesn't mean I'm going to insult conservatives.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
After some neg points from this thread, let me rephrase:Is it any coincidence that the majority of my negative score comes from debate and serious talk? Oh dear...I'd better stop posting conservative views, or that bad old -karma will annoy me.Liberals are taking it to us...one anonymous pussy -karma at a time.
So, I point out that negative karma typically goes to people with strong views regardless of how they express them, and you imply that I'm bignoting myself?
LOLBubbalo wrote:
So, I point out that negative karma typically goes to people with strong views regardless of how they express them, and you imply that I'm bignoting myself?
Yep - you're right. They did supply many of the troops for Iraq...... even if they supplied THE troops FOR iraq.[bpuk]jack wrote:
The USA (I dont care what anyone says) supplied many of the troops for Iraq and initiated teh conflict in which Britain stood firm as an ally.
(i.e. sold iraq loadsa weapons short time before war started)
yay finaly a nice thread about brits and yanks
Yet another one of lowing's astoundingly insightful posts. Really, they should make you an associate professor at Cambridge or something.lowing wrote:
LOL
/nominate
LOLBubbalo wrote:
Yet another one of lowing's astoundingly insightful posts. Really, they should make you an associate professor at Cambridge or something.lowing wrote:
LOL
well lol this is a very old topic of mine i thought id drag up
Why the fuck did you bump this?
coz i felt like it, and im ill and boredCougar wrote:
Why the fuck did you bump this?
atlvolunteer wrote:
I have always held you brits in high regard and am glad that we have remained such good allies.
Xbone Stormsurgezz