I paid $40 for Half-Life and $45 for Half-Life 2...Between Counter-Strike and CS:Source, I probably got 6 1/2 years worth of gaming for my approx. $90-100 bucks. Maybe I'm spoiled by Valve's attention to customer satisfaction, but if EA thinks I'm going to move on to the next half-assed attempt to milk the Battlefield franchise after already spending $90+ dollars on a game that came out a year ago, they are sorely mistaken. The only game franchises I will buy on a year-to-year basis are usually sports games on console, and they make damn sure to come out with new engines and try to perfect those as much as possible BEFORE release (for obvious reasons).
If EA wants to create a franchise out of Battlefield, they sure fucked up when... almost every one of their patches either A) failed to actually "fix" stuff it was supposed to (red tag bug, anyone? survived thru like 5 patches to fix it so far, and it's not even something people have to exploit), B) actually created NEW problems, C) changed game balance in various ways that were generally unpopular and showed lack of testing, or D) managed to miraculously pull off A,B, & C in one patch.
Not to mention I'm not a huge fan of very futuristic games...Half-Life was a good mix of future and present, and Quake Wars looks intruiging simply b/c it's so beautiful, but for a massive multiplayer shooter I'll take assault rifles, tanks and helicopters over massive hovering geometric shapes and mechwarriors.
I just hope it gets rid of all the dumbasses whose brains can't grasp the advanced tactical aspects of BF2 to begin with and want to move on to the newest thing as soon as it comes out.