BF2S Forums I'm so sick of this crap

one_of_ten wrote:

Canin wrote:

I have a question. Everyone keeps talking about Lebanese civilian casualties, and how the Israeli Army is targeting civilians with arty and air strikes rather than using ground troops in conventional style warfare, but has anyone actually seen a Hezbollah Military uniform???? I've searched for some time, and I just cant seem to find a picture of one. So I am curious how the Israeli Army is supposed to differentiate between the civilians and Hezbollah when the are apparently dressed the same and the Hezbollah are using civilian areas as bases of operations????

You're right about the uniform but they should try to avoid civilian deaths by any means unless they make south Lebanon a free fire zone and blow up everything that moves.

    And what about the patriot anti-missile thing, does it work ???

How in blue blazes do you avoid civilian deaths when your enemy combatant is dressed like them, smells like them and probably even soils thier pants like the civilians when they hear an airstrike headed thier way??

Oh, wait, I know, the U.N.  could send over a bunch of blue paint and ask all the hezzies to pour a bucket of it on themselves so they will stand out. FFS people, you cant honestly believe that there have been over 700 civilian lebonese deaths and not one of them was a member of hezbollah can you? Can you, really?

jonsimon wrote:

Because we are no longer in the age of wars. Decimating people never gained us anything, and it wont start helping now. Maybe they should target you, wherever you are, and wipe a cruel bastard off the face of this earth.

Thats right, the age of war is over, now we have progressed into the age of cowardly terrorist insurgent attacks. I dont know about you, but I think the old age of war was much more gentleman like than this new age you are touting. And as for wishing they would target King_County_Downy, just remember that unless you believe what they believe, they will target you when they are done with him.....

Last edited by Canin (2006-08-07 20:28:29)

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

Flecco wrote:

We should stop pussyfooting around with terrorist harboring countries eh? Well, almost every country on earth harbors terrorists. Weather they know it or not...

How often do you see France launching Qassam rockets into Germany?

all the time.

Man, take a few moments to write something and the conversation moves on without you.....

HM1{N} wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

Actually, Israel started indiscriminately with bombs and artillery, THEN Hezbollah started lobbing rockets.

sry, try again. Hezbollah started the shit. Isreal and the rest of the world will end it.

Kidnapping 2 soldiers does not justify killing 700+ civilians with glee...or do I need to post pictures of Israeli soldiers "trophy posing" with their kills?

Get some Japanese pictures from their war with China. The ones were the Japs cut the dicks of dead Chinese and stick them in the corpses' mouth. Thats a real trophy picture.

rawls wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

sry, try again. Hezbollah started the shit. Isreal and the rest of the world will end it.

Kidnapping 2 soldiers does not justify killing 700+ civilians with glee...or do I need to post pictures of Israeli soldiers "trophy posing" with their kills?

Get some Japanese pictures from their war with China. The ones were the Japs cut the dicks of dead Chinese and stick them in the corpses' mouth. Thats a real trophy picture.

Go watch an Alquada (sp?) video, do you think that they don't enjoy what they did to US troops? Civilians? Get a brain here, the Islamic bible specifically states to kill infidels (any people who do not convert to Islam).  Their god isn't one of peace and wanting balance like the Jewish want and believe in, but Allah is a god that wants everyone to die.  These people enjoy the killing of infidels.  We have to strike back in order to survive, kill, or be killed.

HM1{N} wrote:

--->[Your]Phobia<--- wrote:

There is also evidence that suggests they (Israel) are using chemical warfare

Can you provide that evidence?

Yes I can here you go, Its GRAPHIC, so please if you have doubts don't click the link....

jonsimon wrote:

Okay, let me get this straight, you think an outnumbered group of middle easter states that do not always agree are defeating North America and the whole of Europe? Almost all the nations on both those continents are "free" nations.

The UN is in no way biased against Israel, if anything, it is biased towards them.

I don't say "defeating"; I say "overruling", as means to explain HMN1's list of 50 UN resolutions condemning Israel.  These were being cited to show how "world opinion" is against Israel.

Plus, "free nation" does not mean unoccupied; it means holding democratic elections and subject to rule of law.  That is why it is so laughable that Syria, Iran, Egypt, China, Sudan have ANYTHING to say, when they are theocracies or autocracies.

Sondernkommando wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Okay, let me get this straight, you think an outnumbered group of middle easter states that do not always agree are defeating North America and the whole of Europe? Almost all the nations on both those continents are "free" nations.

The UN is in no way biased against Israel, if anything, it is biased towards them.

I don't say "defeating"; I say "overruling", as means to explain HMN1's list of 50 UN resolutions condemning Israel.  These were being cited to show how "world opinion" is against Israel.

Plus, "free nation" does not mean unoccupied; it means holding democratic elections and subject to rule of law.  That is why it is so laughable that Syria, Iran, Egypt, China, Sudan have ANYTHING to say, when they are theocracies or autocracies.

Ummm, no that's not why they were being cited: they were being cited to show Israels blatant disregard for any human life that isn't Israeli Jew.

--->[Your]Phobia<--- wrote:

Yes I can here you go, Its[/color] GRAPHIC, so please if you have doubts don't click the link....

That doesn't actually say what weapons caused the bodies to blacken like that. To me, that looks like flash burns but i'm not an expert on the subject. Either way, thats not proof that they are using anything other than conventional weapons. The guy writting doesn't even say that they are chemical weapons, only asking us what could cause that kind of damage

CyrusTheVirus wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

Sondernkommando wrote:

I don't say "defeating"; I say "overruling", as means to explain HMN1's list of 50 UN resolutions condemning Israel.  These were being cited to show how "world opinion" is against Israel.

Plus, "free nation" does not mean unoccupied; it means holding democratic elections and subject to rule of law.  That is why it is so laughable that Syria, Iran, Egypt, China, Sudan have ANYTHING to say, when they are theocracies or autocracies.

Ummm, no that's not why they were being cited: they were being cited to show Israels blatant disregard for any human life that isn't Israeli Jew.

Are you suggesting they put others lives ahead of their own when their own are being threatened? Get a dose of  reality man. It's soft stances like that which will bring an end to Israel. I'm glad Israelis ruthlessly defend their homeland - it seems everyone bar the US wants to see it and all of its inhabitants dead. The anti-semitism on this forum is ridiculous.

LOL.  Nothing I have ever said is anti-semitic, but if it is, then I equally hate Arabs, Muslims, Jews, etc...since they all fall under the term "anti-semitic".

I'm totally against Israel as a state, and I am totally against Israel's policies.

NOTE:  My Jewish ex has been laughing her ass off at all of you who label me anti-semitic, you couldn't be further from the truth.  I also don't condone a lot of what the U.S. does, does that make me anti-american?  ME, a 7 year military veteran?  I don't think so.

Come up with some valid arguments instead of just throwing insults around.  You might make people believe you can actually think for yourself if you do...

Here's an english lesson for y'all:

Main Entry: Sem·ite
Pronunciation: 'se-"mIt, especially British 'sE-"mIt
Function: noun
Etymology: French sémite, from Semitic Shem, from Late Latin, from Greek SEm, from Hebrew ShEm
1 a : a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b : a descendant of these peoples
2 : a member of a modern people speaking a Semitic language

Last edited by HM1{N} (2006-08-08 12:50:19)

HM1{N} wrote:

CyrusTheVirus wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

Ummm, no that's not why they were being cited: they were being cited to show Israels blatant disregard for any human life that isn't Israeli Jew.

Are you suggesting they put others lives ahead of their own when their own are being threatened? Get a dose of  reality man. It's soft stances like that which will bring an end to Israel. I'm glad Israelis ruthlessly defend their homeland - it seems everyone bar the US wants to see it and all of its inhabitants dead. The anti-semitism on this forum is ridiculous.

LOL.  Nothing I have ever said is anti-semitic, but if it is, then I equally hate Arabs, Muslims, Jews, etc...since they all fall under the term "anti-semitic".

I'm totally against Israel as a state, and I am totally against Israel's policies.

NOTE:  My Jewish ex has been laughing her ass off at all of you who label me anti-semitic, you couldn't be further from the truth.  I also don't condone a lot of what the U.S. does, does that make me anti-american?  ME, a 7 year military veteran?  I don't think so.

Come up with some valid arguments instead of just throwing insults around.  You might make people believe you can actually think for yourself if you do...

Here's an english lesson for y'all:

Main Entry: Sem·ite
Pronunciation: 'se-"mIt, especially British 'sE-"mIt
Function: noun
Etymology: French sémite, from Semitic Shem, from Late Latin, from Greek SEm, from Hebrew ShEm
1 a : a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b : a descendant of these peoples
2 : a member of a modern people speaking a Semitic language

Don't give me the semantics bullshit. In modern language an anti-semite might as well be someone who is anti-Israel. That's my view anyway. Criticise Israel all you want but guess what? They don't give a flying fuck what you think and neither do the administration of this great country in which I live. That sacred patch of ground in the middle east is all they've got and they, let's not forget, are protecting our christian holy sites from the hordes of militant islam.

HM1{N} wrote:

CyrusTheVirus wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

Ummm, no that's not why they were being cited: they were being cited to show Israels blatant disregard for any human life that isn't Israeli Jew.

Are you suggesting they put others lives ahead of their own when their own are being threatened? Get a dose of  reality man. It's soft stances like that which will bring an end to Israel. I'm glad Israelis ruthlessly defend their homeland - it seems everyone bar the US wants to see it and all of its inhabitants dead. The anti-semitism on this forum is ridiculous.

LOL.  Nothing I have ever said is anti-semitic, but if it is, then I equally hate Arabs, Muslims, Jews, etc...since they all fall under the term "anti-semitic".

I'm totally against Israel as a state, and I am totally against Israel's policies.

NOTE:  My Jewish ex has been laughing her ass off at all of you who label me anti-semitic, you couldn't be further from the truth.  I also don't condone a lot of what the U.S. does, does that make me anti-american?  ME, a 7 year military veteran?  I don't think so.

Come up with some valid arguments instead of just throwing insults around.  You might make people believe you can actually think for yourself if you do...

Here's an english lesson for y'all:

Main Entry: Sem·ite
Pronunciation: 'se-"mIt, especially British 'sE-"mIt
Function: noun
Etymology: French sémite, from Semitic Shem, from Late Latin, from Greek SEm, from Hebrew ShEm
1 a : a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b : a descendant of these peoples
2 : a member of a modern people speaking a Semitic language

QFE

That was a damn fine post. And you have my respect as a veteran, I believe anyone who serves for their homeland, be them Israeli, Brazillian, American or whatever, deserves respect.

Miller wrote:

rawls wrote:

HM1{N} wrote:

Kidnapping 2 soldiers does not justify killing 700+ civilians with glee...or do I need to post pictures of Israeli soldiers "trophy posing" with their kills?

Get some Japanese pictures from their war with China. The ones were the Japs cut the dicks of dead Chinese and stick them in the corpses' mouth. Thats a real trophy picture.

Go watch an Alquada (sp?) video, do you think that they don't enjoy what they did to US troops? Civilians? Get a brain here, the Islamic bible specifically states to kill infidels (any people who do not convert to Islam).  Their god isn't one of peace and wanting balance like the Jewish want and believe in, but Allah is a god that wants everyone to die.  These people enjoy the killing of infidels.  We have to strike back in order to survive, kill, or be killed.

any people who do not convert to Islam

HAHAHAHA. next time i walk past a person that looks like a Muslim, I'll remember to watch my back. DICK HEAD, get a clue.

Your whole post is BS, seriously get a clue.