Des.Kmal
Member
+917|7095|Atlanta, Georgia, USA
I have seen many videos of people using aimbots. I usually didnt think they were that good. Then, on 24/7 Sharqi, a guy kept complaining that he was being sniped from the hotel at the heli spawn. He said he had an aimbot. But, my experience, they arent that useful.

I have an acceptable accuracy, been accused of aimbots before.

How good can they actually be? In the vids i saw, they didnt kill in one shot.

So, my question is, are aimbots manipulating the game by aiming the bullet to hit in one shot, or manipulation the gun to aim at the head? In the vids i saw, it was aimed at the head, but it still missed sometimes.

Can anyone clear this up?
Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|7104|Canada
i think its manipulating it so u aim at the person automaticaly. in sum vids a guy just killed an enemy and a jet flys by and the guys crosshairs just follows it. so the bullets dont autoaim, the whole person does.
Defiance
Member
+438|7148

I don't know exactly how the aimbot is coded and how it works, but there are different types.

One type aims the gun and shoots. Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.

But, battlerecorder and it's lack of first person view make it almost impossible to tell who is hacking if it's not detected by PB.

You hear that Dice? You're skimpy coding of the BR software is aiding hackers!
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|7040|British Columbia, Canada

Des.Kmal wrote:

my experience, they arent that useful.
So you've used them?

I've seen a Youtube Video of a Aimbot that actually worked.. Guy was shooting ppl in the Head with the Type-88? (i always get the Tank, and Chinese Sniper Rifle Confused) and he cleaned out the carrier pretty dam fast with that aim-bot..
Des.Kmal
Member
+917|7095|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

destruktion_6143 wrote:

i think its manipulating it so u aim at the person automaticaly. in sum vids a guy just killed an enemy and a jet flys by and the guys crosshairs just follows it. so the bullets dont autoaim, the whole person does.
thats what i was thinking, the guy said he was being sniped from half the map away. So, thats when i was thinking the bullets were aimed.

Shit, u can aim ur damn self, u dont need an aimbot then. ffs

LT.Victim wrote:

Des.Kmal wrote:

my experience, they arent that useful.
So you've used them?

I've seen a Youtube Video of a Aimbot that actually worked.. Guy was shooting ppl in the Head with the Type-88? (i always get the Tank, and Chinese Sniper Rifle Confused) and he cleaned out the carrier pretty dam fast with that aim-bot..
*looks at accuracy* I dont need them,

No, i was talking about the vids i saw.

Defiance wrote:

One type aims the gun and shoots. Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.
[u]Thats[/i] what im talking about, the whole thread is based on this perspective questionairing.

Last edited by Des.Kmal (2006-08-05 19:44:23)

Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003
I know a hacker, he codes and uses aimbots, wallhacks, full view distance ect, and he explained it to me once before. Apparently, the gun can be aimed at the head, but the spread of the bullets cannot be coded into a hack because it is serverside, not hardcoded into the game. Also, they don't work well in the videos because those using them are complete shit even with them. They know nothing of deviation. However, if used correctly, (I'll ask my buddy to make a video of his hacks to show you how a skilled player without hacks is a beast with them) they can be almost unstoppable. I'm assuming you've seen the MSX video's, and to this I say; Everyone at MSX is equivolent (skill wise) to a first time FPS'er, and they use hacks to make themselves better, but still suck anyway.
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003

Defiance wrote:

Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.
This isn't CS. That is impossible in Battlefield 2.

Sorry to double post.
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|7197|California

spray and pray > aimbot
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003
Thats usually how the people in the videos use them anyhow.
Phrozenbot
Member
+632|7093|do not disturb

Is there any sense of accomplishment when you cheat?
Defiance
Member
+438|7148

Ben>You wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.
This isn't CS. That is impossible in Battlefield 2.

Sorry to double post.
How do you know it's impossible? I wouldn't second guess it, unless you've tried and failed. Maybe a better coder.

But with all the security glitches in BF2 as is, I think that almost anything can be done with some C++ ninjaing.
Des.Kmal
Member
+917|7095|Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Defiance wrote:

Ben>You wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.
This isn't CS. That is impossible in Battlefield 2.

Sorry to double post.
How do you know it's impossible? I wouldn't second guess it, unless you've tried and failed. Maybe a better coder.

But with all the security glitches in BF2 as is, I think that almost anything can be done with some C++ ninjaing.
true true son, ninjaing? dubya-tee-effe.

Hellogoodsir wrote:

Is there any sense of accomplishment when you cheat?
No.
Add me on Origin for Battlefield 4 fun: DesKmal
Defiance
Member
+438|7148

Hellogoodsir wrote:

Is there any sense of accomplishment when you cheat?
I've tried to figure it out, but the when people say "Oh, it's because they suck" that isn't all of it.

To them, it's either fun to play around with, or they like raging. Pathetic on any accounts.
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003

Defiance wrote:

Ben>You wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Another manipulates the server so that bullets are read as "hits" even when they missed by a mile.
This isn't CS. That is impossible in Battlefield 2.

Sorry to double post.
How do you know it's impossible? I wouldn't second guess it, unless you've tried and failed. Maybe a better coder.

But with all the security glitches in BF2 as is, I think that almost anything can be done with some C++ ninjaing.
Maybe the game is written in Python? Maybe you have no clue as to what you're talking about? If you could manipulate a server in BF2 don't you think coders could fix the bullet spread? I'm looking forward to an answer.
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003

destruktion_6143 wrote:

i think its manipulating it so u aim at the person automaticaly. in sum vids a guy just killed an enemy and a jet flys by and the guys crosshairs just follows it. so the bullets dont autoaim, the whole person does.
Usually there is a button hardcoded into the aimbot that dictates when to auto-aim. Like pressing and holding ~ for example.
RyansRangers
Member
+2|7008
Some people have way to much time to figure out how to cheat the system. Next time u complain about punk buster booting u or a new update, its because of people like u with too much time on your hands. Just play the game! And if u have that much extra time go out and do something. Go join the military if your that into the game. Damn!
gburndred
tiga tiga tiga tiga tiga woods ya'll
+95|7116|Calgary,AB,Canada
BF2 is server side, not client side, i was watcing a video of it somewhere, hacks like, god mode and unlimited ammo, and other stuff along that line are almost impossible to make, cause you then have to manipulate the server files itself and not your client files.
Defiance
Member
+438|7148

Ben>You wrote:

Defiance wrote:

Ben>You wrote:


This isn't CS. That is impossible in Battlefield 2.

Sorry to double post.
How do you know it's impossible? I wouldn't second guess it, unless you've tried and failed. Maybe a better coder.

But with all the security glitches in BF2 as is, I think that almost anything can be done with some C++ ninjaing.
Maybe the game is written in Python? Maybe you have no clue as to what you're talking about? If you could manipulate a server in BF2 don't you think coders could fix the bullet spread? I'm looking forward to an answer.
Calm down, you seem very close to an aneurysm. The game may be written in python, but a lot of hacks are written in CSS, and much like HTML, PHP and JS, they can interface in different ways.

A server hook is one example.
Ben>You
Member
+90|7003
PunkBuster is a joke. I know people that have coded their own hacks and gotten away with it since the game's release. If it's not publicly released they don't care, plain and simple.
gburndred
tiga tiga tiga tiga tiga woods ya'll
+95|7116|Calgary,AB,Canada

Ben>You wrote:

PunkBuster is a joke. I know people that have coded their own hacks and gotten away with it since the game's release. If it's not publicly released they don't care, plain and simple.
Exactly, cause its harder to find out what the small people are doing to the game
Defiance
Member
+438|7148

Ben>You wrote:

PunkBuster is a joke. I know people that have coded their own hacks and gotten away with it since the game's release. If it's not publicly released they don't care, plain and simple.
+1.

gburndred wrote:

Ben>You wrote:

PunkBuster is a joke. I know people that have coded their own hacks and gotten away with it since the game's release. If it's not publicly released they don't care, plain and simple.
Exactly, cause its harder to find out what the small people are doing to the game
Yes, because PB doesn't have the info of how the hack works, and how it works and therefore how to detect it. But also private hacks don't have the effect of public hacks. W/o public hacks, there are a lot less hackers and because of the previous reasons, private hacks are very hard to battle.

Last edited by Defiance (2006-08-05 20:02:03)

Ben>You
Member
+90|7003

Defiance wrote:

Ben>You wrote:

Defiance wrote:

How do you know it's impossible? I wouldn't second guess it, unless you've tried and failed. Maybe a better coder.

But with all the security glitches in BF2 as is, I think that almost anything can be done with some C++ ninjaing.
Maybe the game is written in Python? Maybe you have no clue as to what you're talking about? If you could manipulate a server in BF2 don't you think coders could fix the bullet spread? I'm looking forward to an answer.
Calm down, you seem very close to an aneurysm. The game may be written in python, but a lot of hacks are written in CSS, and much like HTML, PHP and JS, they can interface in different ways.

A server hook is one example.
This isn't Counter Strike. EA was very meticulous when they coded this game, and all aimbots have to be coded in python. Plain and simple. However, D3D hacks (Wallhacks) can be coded in other types of code.

Last edited by Ben>You (2006-08-05 20:00:58)

Defiance
Member
+438|7148

Ben>You wrote:

This isn't Counter Strike. EA was very meticulous when they coded this game, and all aimbots have to be coded in python. Plain and simple. However, D3D hacks (Wallhacks) can be coded in other types of code.
You say plain and simple far too much. This is the world of computers, nothing is simple if not plain.

Also, you sound like you speak from experience, which doesn't make me like you.

What else doesn't make me like you? EA didn't code the game buddy, Dice did.

Last edited by Defiance (2006-08-05 20:04:03)

negolien
Member
+3|6973
Hey,

  For those hacks tryin to say non exist it's because they don't want to give away their secrets.


look up m s x + hacks btw u can't link ity cause it wont link it.

Last edited by negolien (2006-08-05 20:07:11)

Ben>You
Member
+90|7003
As I've said, I used to hack CS, and I am in contact with a very well known AA/BF2/ Every other game he's played hacker/coder. I couldn't care less if you liked me or not, I came to this thread to inform those who would actually listen to what someone with much knowledge on the subject had to say.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard