i dont care if they were crying their arses off as they climbed into their F16's and loaded their M109 self propelled artillery pieces, the fact is they continued striking at the civi targets whenn the civilians had no way of escaping, and sometimes there were no terrorists at all
Poll
Should the Israeli government pay to rebuild Lebanon?
Yes | 47% | 47% - 63 | ||||
No | 52% | 52% - 71 | ||||
Total: 134 |
you are simply ignorant, u hav some way of disreguard ANYthing that i say, even if it means making up theories that hav absolutly no proof. Hey Guys, everyone, if u need any answers this guy knows them, and if not he'll rustle u up one
?????Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
you are simply ignorant, u hav some way of disreguard ANYthing that i say, even if it means making up theories that hav absolutly no proof. Hey Guys, everyone, if u need any answers this guy knows them, and if not he'll rustle u up one
No i'm not disregarding it, I just have not heard of specific events that you are talking about. I'm ignorant, your not even reading what I'm writing. Theories that have absolutely no proof?? What are you referring to. Rustle one up? Your not being specific. Be specific and I will try to provide proof or clarify. You don't have to be an ass about it sheesh.
And another thing how old are you, just curious, many spelling mistakes, or are you just trying to type really fast?
I agree, in the aftermath, there were no terrorists found, I guess that is bad intel. Have to agree with you there. And I didn't mean to imply that they were crying while doing it. I'm just saying that in general, Israel does not condone intentionally taking out civilian targets.Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
i dont care if they were crying their arses off as they climbed into their F16's and loaded their M109 self propelled artillery pieces, the fact is they continued striking at the civi targets whenn the civilians had no way of escaping, and sometimes there were no terrorists at all
the spelling mistakes are on account of the fact that i am trying to keep up with replying to ur long string of false info.
Theories that have absolutely no proof - "Ever hear of propaganda, imagine that. The terrorists probably picked up the pamphlets and got out so that the only killed would be civilians. Hmmmm. "Witnesses" are generally unreliable."
Theories that have absolutely no proof - "Ever hear of propaganda, imagine that. The terrorists probably picked up the pamphlets and got out so that the only killed would be civilians. Hmmmm. "Witnesses" are generally unreliable."
Ok, no worries than. False info. I did not imply that that statement was fact, It was more of a theory. and yes Witnesses are generally unreliable, especially where terrorists are predominant. I have never once accused you of giving FALSE info/FACTS, just innacurate opinions. Why are you so angry?? Oh and thanks for being specific. To clarify, that was a THEORY, i did not intend it as fact. Oh you even mentioned it as a theory, well my whole point was just to infer that statement, not provide any proof per se. It was just a thought, sorry!Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
the spelling mistakes are on account of the fact that i am trying to keep up with replying to ur long string of false info.
Theories that have absolutely no proof - "Ever hear of propaganda, imagine that. The terrorists probably picked up the pamphlets and got out so that the only killed would be civilians. Hmmmm. "Witnesses" are generally unreliable."
Here are some facts about the civilian death toll, and how disproportionate the israeli responce really was.
Lebanese - 481 civilians dead
1100 wounded
Israeli - 41 civilians dead
418 wounded
Lebanese - 481 civilians dead
1100 wounded
Israeli - 41 civilians dead
418 wounded
Source?Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
Here are some facts about the civilian death toll, and how disproportionate the israeli responce really was.
Lebanese - 481 civilians dead
1100 wounded
Israeli - 41 civilians dead
418 wounded
Ok nevermind, yeah those numbers are close to what i've foundAlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Source?Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
Here are some facts about the civilian death toll, and how disproportionate the israeli responce really was.
Lebanese - 481 civilians dead
1100 wounded
Israeli - 41 civilians dead
418 wounded
Lebanon Civilians: 1,130 dead, 3,600 wounded.
Israeli Civilians: 52 dead 648 wounded, 875 suffered from shock
What about the 500+ Hezbollah fighters dead. Once again this all boils down to Hezbollah's tactics, not Israeli's intentions.
Ok I just noticed that the numbers on Wiki don't even match up, thats not very reliable if they can't even agree in two different sections on the same page. However, I agree that much more Lebanese civilians were killed,
Reason? Israeli wanted them dead? No
Hezbollah tactics.
Reason? Israeli wanted them dead? No
Hezbollah tactics.
i dont believe this to b the case, it was still a disproportionate use of force, or as you say tactics, it isnt the hezbollah tactics that need to change it is the israeli tactic that need changing, they are far to heavy handed, and that is why so many lebanese civi's died
500+ Hezbollah dead, haha.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Ok nevermind, yeah those numbers are close to what i've foundAlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
Source?Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
Here are some facts about the civilian death toll, and how disproportionate the israeli responce really was.
Lebanese - 481 civilians dead
1100 wounded
Israeli - 41 civilians dead
418 wounded
Lebanon Civilians: 1,130 dead, 3,600 wounded.
Israeli Civilians: 52 dead 648 wounded, 875 suffered from shock
What about the 500+ Hezbollah fighters dead. Once again this all boils down to Hezbollah's tactics, not Israeli's intentions.
The only one saying that is Israel.
The more unbiased estimates i heard were around 100.
+1, You finally made a coherent point without being so angry. I agree, their tactics are a little forceful. But "sometimes" that is neccessary. I think they should have planned out their targets more carefully ( I think you can agree to that) And I think that the Lebanese should try and push Hezbollah out as well (which won't happen) but it sure would make identifying targets much more easier.Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
i dont believe this to b the case, it was still a disproportionate use of force, or as you say tactics, it isnt the hezbollah tactics that need to change it is the israeli tactic that need changing, they are far to heavy handed, and that is why so many lebanese civi's died
Ok so one last question for you sir: Do you think that Israelis WANTED to kill civilians??
Maybe it should be paid for by the same people that supplied the terrorists with the rockets fired into Israel.................IRAN!
Lebanese civilians were caught in the middle because their county had Terrorists basiclly setup shop there. I feel for the Lebanese people, but also for the Israeli people too.
Fuck Hezbollah and their supporters!
Lebanese civilians were caught in the middle because their county had Terrorists basiclly setup shop there. I feel for the Lebanese people, but also for the Israeli people too.
Fuck Hezbollah and their supporters!
10-4, you got me on that one I guess, the only way to find out the truth is to wait, or maybe we will never know.PRiMACORD wrote:
The only one saying that is Israel.
The more unbiased estimates i heard were around 100.
+1 Good attitude. That right there sums up my arguement!!SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
Maybe it should be paid for by the same people that supplied the terrorists with the rockets fired into Israel.................IRAN!
Lebanese civilians were caught in the middle because their county had Terrorists basiclly setup shop there. I feel for the Lebanese people, but also for the Israeli people too.
Fuck Hezbollah and their supporters!
The two soldiers were just an escuse to have a war with lebabnon and try to eliminate hezzbollah(which they havent done). Now this peace treaty comes out and Isrial accepts it and its says nothing about the return od the two kidnapped soldiers.
Another good point. God you guys, I'm gonna run out of karma points!!!{B-T}<babacanosh> wrote:
The two soldiers were just an escuse to have a war with lebabnon and try to eliminate hezzbollah(which they havent done). Now this peace treaty comes out and Isrial accepts it and its says nothing about the return od the two kidnapped soldiers.
A damn good excuse I might add, Hezbollah and groups like it have no right to exist in the world with the way they currently conduct their business. Yeah so what of the two soldiers? Good job UN.
does it matter if they intended to or not, it is a fact that they were heavy handed, small special forces raids would hav been far more effective
Agreed, but your dodging my question!!Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
does it matter if they intended to or not, it is a fact that they were heavy handed, small special forces raids would hav been far more effective
I'm just curious on what you think, it doesn't matter either way.
Cmon now
Ok so one last question for you sir: Do you think that Israelis WANTED to kill civilians??
Israel started bombing Lebanon first.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
+1 Good attitude. That right there sums up my arguement!!SGT_Dicklewicz wrote:
Maybe it should be paid for by the same people that supplied the terrorists with the rockets fired into Israel.................IRAN!
Lebanese civilians were caught in the middle because their county had Terrorists basiclly setup shop there. I feel for the Lebanese people, but also for the Israeli people too.
Fuck Hezbollah and their supporters!
Hezbollah captured 2 soldiers and killed 3 others in a ground raid to negotiate a prisoner exchange. Bombing is the appropriate response to that?
Bombs endanger the lives of the captured soldiers even more.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/ … .timeline/
"July 2006: Hezbollah militants cross into Israel, kill three Israeli soldiers and kidnap two others in a bid to negotiate a prisoner exchange, a demand rebuffed by Israel. Another five Israeli soldiers are killed after the ambush. Israel responds with a naval blockade and by bombing hundreds of targets in Lebanon, including Beirut's airport and Hezbollah's headquarters in southern Beirut. Hezbollah responds with rocket attacks targeting northern Israeli cities. Fighting leaves dozens of Lebanese civilians dead and coincides with a two-week-old Israeli military campaign in Gaza in response to the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier by Palestinian militants."
no, and yes, not initially, but as soon as they realised that they were hitting civi's they should hav stopped and after that point i hold them accountable for every death
Ok, yeah I hold them accountable too, but I dont' think they really mean to kill civilians to for example lower Hezbollah's morale (well that wouldn't work, it would just piss off Lebanon and Hezbollah)Fld_Mrsl_Arts wrote:
no, and yes, not initially, but as soon as they realised that they were hitting civi's they should hav stopped and after that point i hold them accountable for every death
I think this has been an excellent discussion, thanks for conversing with me and sharing your point of view. If more people would freaking do that and not be a-holes than the world would be far safer, better, and cooler. Now if only we could take over the U.N. we could solve sooo many problems!!!
To primacord:
It was WIDELY underreported that the SAME day that Israel invaded, BEFORE they did, Hezbollah was already firing rockets. Israel did not start bombing first. Besides Hezbollah has been indiscrimantly firing rockets into Israel for years ( well not on such a wide scale and it stopped for a couple of months prior to this).
what bugs me the most about all of this is that Israel is NOT at war with Lebanon.
The Cease fire is a joke IMO. Gives Hezbollah time to get more entrenched.
If it was my war to fight, I would tell all the lebanese people to leave and friggin Napalm the crap out of Hezbollah. Then make Iran rebuild the damn country.
The Cease fire is a joke IMO. Gives Hezbollah time to get more entrenched.
If it was my war to fight, I would tell all the lebanese people to leave and friggin Napalm the crap out of Hezbollah. Then make Iran rebuild the damn country.