Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX

Jay wrote:

I would've had about $50k in student loan debt if I had gone straight through. It would already have been paid off years ago.

Instead, I took a job that paid less than minimum wage, came with a strong chance of death and cost me nearly 5 years in earnings potential in my career. I'd say the taxpayer made a nice profit off of me.
Do we really have to go through the whole 'Jay Galt the self-made man and altruistic war hero and true patriot' thing again?

Because, you know, its really tiring.

TBH I think there's something seriously wrong with your brain if you keep bringing it up.

You had no clue what to do with your life, dropped out of one course, signed up for what you thought would be a cushy number with a free education at the end of it in preference to backing yourself with a loan and were unlucky enough to get sent abroad to sit in a desert on behalf of Halliburton and Israel, then married into money.

A Randian superman you are not, OK?
Fuck Israel
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5618|London, England

uziq wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

SuperJail Warden wrote:


And it is time you give back to the community that invested in you when the free market wouldn't. Pay your taxes you whiny hypocrite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WTfoT_y-BQ

if you don't want to pay lower taxes you're a bit of an idiot.
another dumb shit with a few textbooks under his arm and a few undergraduate seminar ideas. cybargs you are missing the whole point of the above exchange. Macbeth isn't saying the government should have free license to tax everything and cause economic mayhem and cause problems with liquidity. thanks for waving your otiose economics knowledge in this thread.

the point is that jay is your TYPICAL, bog standard, small-minded chump. he took tax money freely and depended on public subsidy when he most needed it; now he's accumulated and acquired a little himself, his reading list has changed, he's made the excuses and rationalised his behaviour to himself with faux-noble, soi disant bullshit, and now he's rallying against 'why should i give up the fruits of my labour hurr durr'. this is what every selfish bastard starts to say when they near 40 and start shitting out little brats. jay is anxious. he wants to send his kids to private school and to leap up the ladder into the respectable upper-middle class. in fact, he's greedy for it. he wants to cheat. he doesn't want to pay back into the system that helped him immensely when he was a lost little kid from a blue-collar neighbourhood with no father to put him through private school.

this is a depressing picture that is as old as taxation itself. dress up his time spent mooching in the military as 'public service' and then use it as a false form of credential to basically discredit the very idea of public service. a republic made up of this sort of 'citizen' is venal and pathetic.
Actually, no, I don't.  My town doesn't offer pre-k so I have to pay out of pocket. My kids will attend public school otherwise.

And I actually grew up in an nice if modest neighborhood past the age of 8. My dad sucks, yes, but my stepfather put food on the tabe and provided for us. My parents were able to help my brothers through college, it was just too much when I was going and they had three other kids to support. I get it now.

You guys need to stop with this whole military is public assistance schtick, it's really insulting to a lot of people who have sacrificed a portion, or all, of their life to defend your country. I'm not saying to worship veterans, but blatant disrespect just because you think you're scoring points or trolling on an Internet forum is gross. You're really not bothering me with it, I just don't want to see you actually start believing it and then make the mistake of voicing it in public. But hey, what do I know, instead of getting mad they might just laugh at your scrawny body and know that deep down you're jealous that your heroism never extended past a TF3 arena.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5618|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

Jay wrote:

I would've had about $50k in student loan debt if I had gone straight through. It would already have been paid off years ago.

Instead, I took a job that paid less than minimum wage, came with a strong chance of death and cost me nearly 5 years in earnings potential in my career. I'd say the taxpayer made a nice profit off of me.
Do we really have to go through the whole 'Jay Galt the self-made man and altruistic war hero and true patriot' thing again?

Because, you know, its really tiring.

TBH I think there's something seriously wrong with your brain if you keep bringing it up.

You had no clue what to do with your life, dropped out of one course, signed up for what you thought would be a cushy number with a free education at the end of it in preference to backing yourself with a loan and were unlucky enough to get sent abroad to sit in a desert on behalf of Halliburton and Israel, then married into money.

A Randian superman you are not, OK?
I'm no Randian superhero. And I didn't marry into money, we're on our own and doing fine.

If you're tired of having the same conversation over and over and over, stop calling veterans welfare dependents every time I say the government is a bloated corrupt mess that needs to be shrunk. Instead of going hey you know, he's right but we really like these particular programs and don't want to see then cut, it is straight to the ad hominem. It's boring and lame.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX
You're basically criticising yourself, and ridiculing Macbeth - for all his faults - for doing things you didn't do.

Parroting a particular line without any critical analysis isn't big or clever either.

Governments are corrupt and self-serving, corporations are corrupt and self-serving, charities are corrupt and self-serving, sports clubs are corrupt and self-serving because guess what? People are corrupt and self-serving and wherever they go greed, corruption, graft, nepotism etc happen.

Singling out government because you think you should keep all the money you earn - earn in large part thanks to the leg-up from 'the govt' (which really means tax-payers) which you were given and took with both hands is boring and lame.
Sure government needs to be shrunk, but in a tax-and-spend economy like yours its a risky manoeuvre now that so much business has now gone off-shore.

If you don't like your situation feel free to pull a John Galt and move somewhere which more suits your ideology - not the one part of America where the greed, graft, corruption taxes and govt subsidy which you so despise are at their pinnacle.
Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

uziq wrote:

so why are you linking dumb economics bullshit? Macbeth is not talking about that.
macbeth is trying to put out there that somehow 'taxes' is a single voter issue when in realty it has much much wider implications.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5618|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

You're basically criticising yourself, and ridiculing Macbeth - for all his faults - for doing things you didn't do.

Parroting a particular line without any critical analysis isn't big or clever either.

Governments are corrupt and self-serving, corporations are corrupt and self-serving, charities are corrupt and self-serving, sports clubs are corrupt and self-serving because guess what? People are corrupt and self-serving and wherever they go greed, corruption, graft, nepotism etc happen.

Singling out government because you think you should keep all the money you earn - earn in large part thanks to the leg-up from 'the govt' (which really means tax-payers) which you were given and took with both hands is boring and lame.
Sure government needs to be shrunk, but in a tax-and-spend economy like yours its a risky manoeuvre now that so much business has now gone off-shore.

If you don't like your situation feel free to pull a John Galt and move somewhere which more suits your ideology - not the one part of America where the greed, graft, corruption taxes and govt subsidy which you so despise are at their pinnacle.
I wish I had the courage to move. I keep talking about moving to South Carolina with my wife, but we'd be all alone, away from our friends and family. I wouldn't take much, if any, pay cut, and our cost of living would be halved. I hate starting over.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5618|London, England

Cybargs wrote:

uziq wrote:

so why are you linking dumb economics bullshit? Macbeth is not talking about that.
macbeth is trying to put out there that somehow 'taxes' is a single voter issue when in realty it has much much wider implications.
Tax cuts would endanger the boner he gets from watching videos of Arabs being bombed. Do not get between a man and his fetishes.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
uziq
Member
+497|3712

Jay wrote:

uziq wrote:

Cybargs wrote:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WTfoT_y-BQ

if you don't want to pay lower taxes you're a bit of an idiot.
another dumb shit with a few textbooks under his arm and a few undergraduate seminar ideas. cybargs you are missing the whole point of the above exchange. Macbeth isn't saying the government should have free license to tax everything and cause economic mayhem and cause problems with liquidity. thanks for waving your otiose economics knowledge in this thread.

the point is that jay is your TYPICAL, bog standard, small-minded chump. he took tax money freely and depended on public subsidy when he most needed it; now he's accumulated and acquired a little himself, his reading list has changed, he's made the excuses and rationalised his behaviour to himself with faux-noble, soi disant bullshit, and now he's rallying against 'why should i give up the fruits of my labour hurr durr'. this is what every selfish bastard starts to say when they near 40 and start shitting out little brats. jay is anxious. he wants to send his kids to private school and to leap up the ladder into the respectable upper-middle class. in fact, he's greedy for it. he wants to cheat. he doesn't want to pay back into the system that helped him immensely when he was a lost little kid from a blue-collar neighbourhood with no father to put him through private school.

this is a depressing picture that is as old as taxation itself. dress up his time spent mooching in the military as 'public service' and then use it as a false form of credential to basically discredit the very idea of public service. a republic made up of this sort of 'citizen' is venal and pathetic.
Actually, no, I don't.  My town doesn't offer pre-k so I have to pay out of pocket. My kids will attend public school otherwise.

And I actually grew up in an nice if modest neighborhood past the age of 8. My dad sucks, yes, but my stepfather put food on the tabe and provided for us. My parents were able to help my brothers through college, it was just too much when I was going and they had three other kids to support. I get it now.

You guys need to stop with this whole military is public assistance schtick, it's really insulting to a lot of people who have sacrificed a portion, or all, of their life to defend your country. I'm not saying to worship veterans, but blatant disrespect just because you think you're scoring points or trolling on an Internet forum is gross. You're really not bothering me with it, I just don't want to see you actually start believing it and then make the mistake of voicing it in public. But hey, what do I know, instead of getting mad they might just laugh at your scrawny body and know that deep down you're jealous that your heroism never extended past a TF3 arena.
tf3? also lol, 'my scrawny body'. yes, jay, my highlighting of your bullshit attitudes ultimately stems from embarrassment about my physique. you deluded fatarse.

and don't lecture me on 'heroism'. my cousin is an officer in the royal marines – one of the hardest units to get into in the world as far as training goes. i've seen what commitments he made, yes, but 'heroism'? what's heroic about volunteering for a career that, in full cognisance and self-interest, one knows will take care of you for life? he joined the military as an officer because he wanted to gain some technical qualifications and career skills that would take care of him later in life. more importantly, he wanted discipline. he wanted meaning. most young men go through an existential agony, and are full of rage and impotent frustration; some of them end up joining the military, which has provided a stable institutional framework for their lives for as long as professional armies have been a thing. don't lecture me on 'heroism'. people join the military because it's a job. more than that, it's a stable career that comes with dozens of perks that a regular job wouldn't. these people aren't being conscripted and sent to the somme. they're making a calculated decision. i see about as much heroism as someone signing up for med school.

just drop the high ideals schtick and admit, much as most other soldiers would in a very prosaic and banal way, that they joined the military because their life was in a deadend and they needed a way out. that was you when you enlisted. you're not a fucking hero.
uziq
Member
+497|3712

Cybargs wrote:

uziq wrote:

so why are you linking dumb economics bullshit? Macbeth is not talking about that.
macbeth is trying to put out there that somehow 'taxes' is a single voter issue when in realty it has much much wider implications.
his point was clearly aimed at voters who will angle for the candidate that gives them a 10% tax break on their annual income over and above any other issue. that is a moronic way to cast a vote and you do not deserve the comforts and security that a liberal democracy provide for you if all you can think about is your domestic budget (not to say material greed and ambitions). macbeth isn't going into a disquisition on the macroeconomics of taxation. you are too eager to flash your dumbshit textbooks.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976


Apparently hillary could have parkinsons or some shit.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
uziq
Member
+497|3712

Jay wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

uziq wrote:

so why are you linking dumb economics bullshit? Macbeth is not talking about that.
macbeth is trying to put out there that somehow 'taxes' is a single voter issue when in realty it has much much wider implications.
Tax cuts would endanger the boner he gets from watching videos of Arabs being bombed. Do not get between a man and his fetishes.
except as macbeth has repeatedly said, time and time again, without a single acknowledgement from you, that he has always worked for a living and assumed full financial responsibility. he's not pro-taxes or anti-military because he's a shirker, is he? you can't seem to admit that fact. he's worked harder than you and is more self-reliant. he doesn't sit on his arse collecting public largesse, watching live leak. that was you on a base in iraq for several years.
uziq
Member
+497|3712

Cybargs wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Apparently hillary could have parkinsons or some shit.
more likely she's under immense stress and overworked and is on a cocktail of medication, surely...
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

uziq wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

uziq wrote:

so why are you linking dumb economics bullshit? Macbeth is not talking about that.
macbeth is trying to put out there that somehow 'taxes' is a single voter issue when in realty it has much much wider implications.
his point was clearly aimed at voters who will angle for the candidate that gives them a 10% tax break on their annual income over and above any other issue. that is a moronic way to cast a vote and you do not deserve the comforts and security that a liberal democracy provide for you if all you can think about is your domestic budget (not to say material greed and ambitions). macbeth isn't going into a disquisition on the macroeconomics of taxation. you are too eager to flash your dumbshit textbooks.
and how is voting for greater government expenditure that benefits yourself any different? a tax cut people get more money in their pocket, and govt programs mean people indirectly get more money from govt.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

uziq wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Apparently hillary could have parkinsons or some shit.
more likely she's under immense stress and overworked and is on a cocktail of medication, surely...
which is all made worst by her previous blood clot apparently.

this is not good.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
uziq
Member
+497|3712
i must have missed the part where macbeth is going to directly benefit from increased government expenditure.

thanks for the summary. i wasn't aware. it never occurred to me that money that isn't taxed... stays in your pocket.

surely the issue is that all of trump's tax cuts are only going to benefit his cronies and cabal of mega-rich? that is always the ideological issue over taxation. again you are full of macroeconomic abstractions that have no bearing on any actual discussion.

Last edited by uziq (2016-08-09 05:39:55)

uziq
Member
+497|3712

Cybargs wrote:

uziq wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqbDBRWb63s

Apparently hillary could have parkinsons or some shit.
more likely she's under immense stress and overworked and is on a cocktail of medication, surely...
which is all made worst by her previous blood clot apparently.

this is not good.
meh. tim kaine is probably a saner president than hilary.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

uziq wrote:

i must have missed the part where macbeth is going to directly benefit from increased government expenditure.

thanks for the summary. i wasn't aware. it never occurred to me that money that isn't taxed... stays in your pocket.

surely the issue is that all of trump's tax cuts are only going to benefit his cronies and cabal of mega-rich? that is always the ideological issue over taxation. again you are full of macroeconomic abstractions that have no bearing on any actual discussion.
Trump’s proposals in his speech in Detroit included reducing the number of income-tax brackets from seven to three, mirroring a plan by House Republicans; eliminating the carried-interest deduction; limiting business income taxes to 15 percent; repatriating corporate cash from overseas, at a 10 percent tax; and eliminating the estate tax.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic … glory-days

Eliminating carried-interest deduction actually makes most investors pay more in taxes, which isn't exactly helping his mates out in wall street either.

I think lowering fed income tax rates and corporations tax is a smart move. Corporations would just shore up their HQ in the caymans and dodge most taxes anyway. best to eliminate deductions and taxes at same time.

Singapore and Hong Kong do quite well with a very minimal taxation system yet they're able to provide public services too.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX

Jay wrote:

I wish I had the courage to move. I keep talking about moving to South Carolina with my wife, but we'd be all alone, away from our friends and family. I wouldn't take much, if any, pay cut, and our cost of living would be halved. I hate starting over.
Then please stop griping about the status quo if you're unwilling to change it.

Also, the ideologues you follow don't give a shit about America or its supposed ideals, they just want to fool the population into voting to funnel taxes in a different direction.
Fuck Israel
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX

Cybargs wrote:

I think lowering fed income tax rates and corporations tax is a smart move. Corporations would just shore up their HQ in the caymans and dodge most taxes anyway. best to eliminate deductions and taxes at same time.
That could be solved with a single act.

As I understand it US citizens have to file tax returns and pay US taxes wherever in the world they live, the same could be done to corporations very easily and offshoring of profits would be ended.
Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

Dilbert_X wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

I think lowering fed income tax rates and corporations tax is a smart move. Corporations would just shore up their HQ in the caymans and dodge most taxes anyway. best to eliminate deductions and taxes at same time.
That could be solved with a single act.

As I understand it US citizens have to file tax returns and pay US taxes wherever in the world they live, the same could be done to corporations very easily and offshoring of profits would be ended.
US govt taxes people wherever they live in the world, pretty rough mang.

It's going to be hard when you're dealing with corporations since how can you really determine their residency status?

lol even the aus govt's future fund is based in the caymans hahahahaa.

Last edited by Cybargs (2016-08-09 06:26:39)

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
uziq
Member
+497|3712
it's an insuperable problem of global capitalism and has been evident for much longer than the recent recession or round of electioneering. the obvious solution 100 years ago, as now, is some form of globally binding legal agreement. oooooh yeah. that's the only way you're going to curb capitalism as a system, anyway. otherwise the 'free market', like advantageous tax policy, will just keep the capital in a constant flight around the globe. not saying i condone any of that, but it's the only way to legally force corporations to pay up their share. corporations want personhood status where it suits them in individual nations but they're cannily vaporous when it comes to taxing their income.

Last edited by uziq (2016-08-09 09:59:47)

Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5618|London, England

Dilbert_X wrote:

Cybargs wrote:

I think lowering fed income tax rates and corporations tax is a smart move. Corporations would just shore up their HQ in the caymans and dodge most taxes anyway. best to eliminate deductions and taxes at same time.
That could be solved with a single act.

As I understand it US citizens have to file tax returns and pay US taxes wherever in the world they live, the same could be done to corporations very easily and offshoring of profits would be ended.
And how do you define a global company as belonging to any one nation-state? Look up corporate inversion. Smaller company headquartered in tax-favorable nation buys larger company and shields it from the higher tax levels of its former home nation. American companies have been doing this in Ireland. Somehow putting a stop to this is one of Clinton's platform planks (but not really, she threatens them, they deposit money in her campaign account to make her forget). The Democrats are absolutely relentless with their constant desire for more government revenue.

Last edited by Jay (2016-08-09 10:59:15)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX
Ah yes, the "I don't see how it could be done therefore its unpossible" argument.

It would be fairly simple to find a way around it, if there were a will to do it:

Tax a company's income in proportion to the shares it has in the local market. Don't want to list on the NASDAQ? OK don't then.

If the majority of the directors are American citizens then its an American company and should be paying US corporate tax.

Want to make use if the US patent system? Great, you can register your company in America and pay tax accordingly.

Cut corporation tax to an internationally comparable level and levy a consumption tax/GST/VAT which is unavoidable and very easy to collect.

Cut corporation tax to an internationally comparable level and levy an income tax which is unavoidable and very easy to collect.
Fuck Israel
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|6976

Dilbert_X wrote:

Ah yes, the "I don't see how it could be done therefore its unpossible" argument.

It would be fairly simple to find a way around it, if there were a will to do it:

Tax a company's income in proportion to the shares it has in the local market. Don't want to list on the NASDAQ? OK don't then.

If the majority of the directors are American citizens then its an American company and should be paying US corporate tax.

Want to make use if the US patent system? Great, you can register your company in America and pay tax accordingly.

Cut corporation tax to an internationally comparable level and levy a consumption tax/GST/VAT which is unavoidable and very easy to collect.

Cut corporation tax to an internationally comparable level and levy an income tax which is unavoidable and very easy to collect.
I think the VAT solution is much better than issues of directorships.

I think you missed the point how these companies avoid tax... Essentially Google USA contracts with Google Cayman's for 'certain services' - the whole point of profit shifting.

This essentially dodges your issue of taking US patents and 'corporate residency'.

Unless you want to do a complete 180 on the doctrine of legal personhood (which is v bad idea), the same issues will still arise.

OECD is trying to change this but, gl m8.

Last edited by Cybargs (2016-08-10 03:01:33)

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,815|6366|eXtreme to the maX

Cybargs wrote:

I think you missed the point how these companies avoid tax... Essentially Google USA contracts with Google Cayman's for 'certain services' - the whole point of profit shifting.
That's straightforward fraud, contracting for non-existent goods or services to evade tax.
Sling a few of these guys in prison for a few decades and it should stop.

Really, its not too hard to get things like simple law changes done - except in America with its mediaeval democratic process.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2016-08-10 04:06:46)

Fuck Israel

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard