BF2S Forums the "best" way to serve eggs

I actually like deviled eggs with an avocado base. Not the best color, but tasty.

Scrambled eggs got maybe one paw up, we'll try omelette next.

you continuously evoke human history, society, culture, civilisation, anthropology ... behaviour, psychology, sociology ... and you’ve not studied or read a whit of any of it.

your use of scientific concepts, as i’ve said time and time again, is lazy shorthand. it’s 90% political bluster and ideology and 10% scientific-sounding nonsense.

the development of systems of weights and measurements doesn’t have anything to do with the theory of evolution. nada. the processes behind civilisations rising and falling and technological advancement are not biological or evolutionary. all human beings have the exact same cognitive ‘hardware’ for this stuff, and at different times and in different places have either excelled or failed in enterprises of it. modern 21st century man is not an 'evolved' version of 15th century man who was not an 'evolution' of ancient roman man or even of bronze-age man: they were all homo sapiens. the long-view of historical development you're seeing there is not a process of biological evolution or of a 'race' 'growing' down another evolutionary 'branch'. this is retarded.

the level of organization or material advancement necessary to become a high-tech civilisation is indeed an interesting topic. it has little to do with biological evolution or ‘races’ developing like dog breeds, though.

ancient egypt had a nubian black dynasty. many west african kingdoms and civilisations historically displayed advanced craftsmanship and proficiency with sculpture, metallurgy, woodwork, etc, etc, far in advance of their peers in early modern europe. civilisations which were just as far away, genetically, from their neighbours on the same continent with the same ‘race’ as they were from europeans, by the way.

you want to fit giant, complex, multi-dynamical systems into a neat theory. understandable. most people prefer the simplest solution. that your answer to everything is a victorian schoolboy’s version of evolution, in which world empires rise and fall because of ‘survival of the fittest’ and the white man works the black with the lash because of ‘nature red in tooth and claw’ is quaint at best, and fucking piteous at worst.

Last edited by uziq (2021-02-25 18:26:05)

i don't mean every human has the same intelligence, but are the same species. great job, pedant.

obviously there is a bell-curve distribution of intelligence generally, but there is no 'white genius'. the phenotypes that affect the pigmentation of your skin or the flatness of your nose don't also give you an innate ability at building steam engines. this conversation is so fucking dumb.

the UK has produced generations of trinidadian, jamaican, west indian, indian, etc, thinkers and writers through the (post-)imperial system. you can pretty quickly shape a 'non-white' into an english gentleman if you send them to a public boarding school, up to oxford, on to the civil service, etc. in two or three generations if not in one. and yet you keep talking about 'racial evolution' and 'racial intelligence'. it's just such patent nonsense.

Last edited by uziq (2021-02-25 20:30:46)

Dilbert_X wrote:

[  ] I believe in evolution, races can be different

[  ] I don't believe in evolution, everyone is exactly the same, Chihuahuas and Dobermans are exactly the same and have exactly the same potential and anyone who says different is a racist

dogs and people are not the same thing. Again, Dilbert, an African person is likely genetically more similar to you than another african. You're literally correlating intelligence & ability, i.e. a person's 'worth' to skin colour with no basis in reality.

I already told you that you can read up on the history of eugenics and all arguments why it was rejected by the click of a button. The eugenics assumptions are wrong. This does not mean there is no physical or perhaps even a psychological difference between races. But it's a fucking stretch of the imagination to equate white and black people to chihuaua's and huskies. The differences between humans are subtle and in many instances literally skin deep. Dog breed variation and races are not the same thing, humans are also extremely homogenous compared to dogs. It'd be more like comparing a black lab and a white lab. They're both labs ffs.

I hate mayo by itself. It can be good as an ingredient, like in raising cane's sauce, love that shit even if it is halfmayo.

RTHKI wrote:

I hate mayo by itself. It can be good as an ingredient, like in raising cane's sauce, love that shit even if it is halfmayo.

Nooooo, Raising Canes is garbage and so is their sauce

you all suck mayo is amazing

RTHKI wrote:

F u their chicken isn't the best but it's the combo and amount of food

The Texas toast is good

I like mayo, it makes a sandwich.

BLT sandwich - mayo
fries - mayo
chicken nuggets - mayo
potatoes, any variety - mayo
sausage - mayo works

ya'll just need better mayo

mayo just gets in to everything. i’m really not into having half a plate of condiment with any of my meals.