How about this for the M95?

2006-09-12 13:16:43

#1

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7201

I read a lot of threads about the M95 sniper rifle, saying it should be an instant kill weapon where ever you hit an enemy.

Well how about they make the rifle a instant kill weapon when you get an head shot.

So instead of people being critically wounded, it would say you have been killed and a medic wouldn't be able to revive you.

A bit like when you are hit by a missile from an Anti tank user.

But it would only instant kill if you get a head shot, but still keep it the same damage for body shots E.G. taking the target down to 2 bars of health.

I think this would make this rifle used more and a bit more like its real life counterpart, without making it over powerful.

What do you guys think?

2006-09-12 13:19:02

#2

blademaster: I'm moving to Brazil; +2,075|7106

yeah that would be a good idea then they would have to release a another patch which addressing that problem and some of the others which requires extra code, and which will require a lot of time. Good idea though but not sure if it will get implemented considering the fact bf2142 is around the corner.

2006-09-12 13:20:47

#3

eagles1106: Member; +269|7044|Marlton, New Jersey.

Dude almost any bullet to the head should make you unrevivable...

2006-09-12 13:20:51

#4

WilhelmSissener: Banned; +557|7194|Oslo, Norway

Let's make a close quarters weapon one hitone kill, make it sharp, shiny, point, buggy and let's give it some badges too!

2006-09-12 13:24:57

#5

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7201

eagles1106 wrote:
Dude almost any bullet to the head should make you unrevivable...

Yep I know, but I am on about how people keep going on about the M95 and how it should do this or that.

So It was just an Idea to make the M95 seem more powerful without going over the top with it.

2006-09-12 13:26:56

#6

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7201

WilhelmSissener wrote:
Let's make a close quarters weapon one hitone kill, make it sharp, shiny, point, buggy and let's give it some badges too!

WTF are you on about?

And who said anything about a one hit kill, I said Instant kill only with head shots instead of critically wounding people.

2006-09-12 13:28:43

#7

I.M.I Militant: We Are Not Alone In Here; +297|7180|Melbourne, Australia

dont bother tryin to improve the game e.a / dice dont give a shit

go play tf2

2006-09-12 13:32:26

#8

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7201

I.M.I Militant wrote:
dont bother tryin to improve the game e.a / dice dont give a shit

go play tf2

Lol your are right about that.

Only posted this because I was reading another thread and some one was complain that the M95 should be able to do this and they have been alot of other thread complaining about it.

2006-09-13 13:45:00

#9

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|7010|UK

Mmmmm I can see the logic in it and I would say yea, but tbh, be happy you got the kill +2 to u sir, and let the man be revived so he can throw a nade at u in vengance! EVERYONES HAPPY THT WAY

2006-09-13 13:48:35

#10

topthrill05: Member; +125|7039|Rochester NY USA

No there are too many nub snipers to begin with. We don't need anymore.

2006-09-13 14:02:07

#11

Hellfire(Fish): Your Favorite Whiny Liberal; +8|6966|Alabama, United States

Why not just make the M95 cause death instead of critical wounding?
It would make it an actual choice when considering what rifle to bring.
Otherwise, the only thing it has going for it is penetrating cockpit glass.

2006-09-13 15:08:05

#12

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7201

Hellfire(Fish) wrote:
Why not just make the M95 cause death instead of critical wounding?
It would make it an actual choice when considering what rifle to bring.
Otherwise, the only thing it has going for it is penetrating cockpit glass.

My god why didnt I think of that.

2006-09-13 15:39:45

#13

Kop: Member; +2|6899

IMO the M95 is only useful for anti material work such as 'trying' to shoot pilots out of choppers or drivers out of jeeps so generally within bf2 it's useless...unlike its real life counterpart.

2006-09-17 10:18:07

#14

wayne-o23: Member; +3|6893

yeh i like this idea a lot bout the head shots, that they should be killed instanstly, also witht he m95 since its a anti material rifle in real life, it should do more damage to jeeps and apc's, and pierce their armour, damaging troops inside, beacause at the moment the only reason for the m95 is to take out heli pilots,

2006-09-20 20:25:06

#15

Evans131: Member; +0|6894|Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Thats a good idea, since I don't think that anyone would be jumping up and running around after they are shot in the head by an M95 in real life.

Wouldn't you agree?

2006-09-20 20:59:16

#16

twiistaaa: Member; +87|7129|mexico

without 100% headshot damage, technically unless you can get pistol shots into them in time, u can never kill a medic since they can heal themselves quicker then you can get off another shot.

2006-09-20 21:01:53

#17

eagles1106: Member; +269|7044|Marlton, New Jersey.

paranoid101 wrote:
eagles1106 wrote:
Dude almost any bullet to the head should make you unrevivable...
Yep I know, but I am on about how people keep going on about the M95 and how it should do this or that.

So It was just an Idea to make the M95 seem more powerful without going over the top with it.

lol, maybe soldiers have steel plated 1 inch thick armor instead of skulls...
I can nail a guy in the forhead with a pistol, he just twitches and continues to stare at me :\

BF2S Forums How about this for the M95?

eagles1106 wrote:

WilhelmSissener wrote:

I.M.I Militant wrote:

Hellfire(Fish) wrote:

paranoid101 wrote:

eagles1106 wrote:

Board footer