FHS01
Member
+2|6882|Nottingham
What should I buy.
AMD® ATHLON® 64BIT FX62 @ 2.8GHZ 2 x 1MB L2 Cache (AM2 pin)
or
INTEL® CORE® 2 EXTREME X6800 (2 X 2.93GHZ) 1066mhz FSB/4MB

What would you boyz say is they way to go? playing BF2 for a bit but 2142 when it's out.

Help would be nice.
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6970|...

intel ...
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6970|...

FHS01
Member
+2|6882|Nottingham
N1 thanks.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7137|Tampa Bay Florida
I've heard the 6800 rocks.... I would get that but it's insanely more expensive than the E6700, so I'm just getting that.  But I wish I were you, lol
joker3327
=IBF2=
+305|7045|Cheshire. UK
Intel at the moment are all over AMD.......so Intel is they way to go!!
DaReJa
BF2s US Server Admin
+257|7074|Los Angeles, California, US.
Prices?

Last edited by DaReJa (2006-09-15 03:46:05)

Battlelog: DaReJa
MyBFi/BF3i Admin

AKA DanielRJ
GameSurge IRC Network, Support Agent and Staff
Phuzion IRC Network, Support Director and Operator
FHS01
Member
+2|6882|Nottingham
Adding to that, Money no issue, ATI v Nvidia top 512 cards
SamuraiDogg
Member
+2|7065|Germany | Nationality Turkish
The graphic card is more important then the CPU. Look for a CPU with a great price-performance and invest your saved money in a good graphic card. Btw the Battlefield series dont support 2 Cpu cores. Maybe the first game which support this technology will be CRYSIS...

IMHO: If u want to buy a new PC I would wait for the next graphic card generation (maybe with DirectX 10)

Ah money no issue... then intel gots at the moment the better technology i think... But like I said bevor, the GPU is more important.

Last edited by SamuraiDogg (2006-09-15 04:10:35)

fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7015
Intel without a doubt.

Since August AMD processors are inferior to Intel processors.
P581
Monkey
+44|6916
Use the search function

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=44303

Last edited by P581 (2006-09-15 05:00:50)

Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|7100
Ashame to see that Intel are in the lead again, I really don't like them as a company.
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
ddenholm67
DanForth Teh Pwnzer
+53|7003|Scotland
amd.
Lucien
Fantasma Parastasie
+1,451|7100
ddenholm and ToiletTrooper,

fuck off.

Read the damn thread, check what he wants and how much he can spend, and do your homework on the current top-of-the-line CPU's.

Damn trolls.
https://i.imgur.com/HTmoH.jpg
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7029|SE London

Intel.

I prefer AMD, but they simply aren't anywhere near as fast at the moment. If you're getting a graphics card too, maybe go for an ATI if your looking for top end stuff - since the high end (well all) Nvidia cards can't do AA and HDR at the same time, you have to pick one or the other, which is annoying.

Maybe get a crossfire system. Or wait for the DX10 cards.
ToiletTrooper
Member
+25|7222|WC
If you buy AMD, dont go for supressor, or supreme, i forgot the name..
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|7184

SargeV1.4 wrote:

Ashame to see that Intel are in the lead again, I really don't like them as a company.
I agree with you to some level. AMD has always been the underdog, they made great processors that could take quite a beating, and were performing better than Intels old architecture.

But Intel has really made some good progress with their Core 2, and the performance of the new Merom should be 50% faster than the old Core 2's.

https://img247.imageshack.us/img247/7619/picture1dv1.png
Tdog2007
Giggity Giggity
+25|7160|US
if you can find an AMD® ATHLON® 64BIT FX Dual-Core i'd buy AMD, but that's just me.
norge
J-10 and a coke please
+18|6917
intel core duo is better, and nvidia kicks ati's ass


btw, since u have no money issues, can u donate some money to me so i can get a better processor?

Last edited by norge (2006-09-17 10:54:29)

Aphex_D
I live for the 306
+26|7089|Uk
Im a AMD+Nvidia Person

Bertster7 wrote:

Maybe get a crossfire system. Or wait for the DX10 cards.
Crossfire fails,
CF  = 3 Cards
SLi = 4 Cards

Last edited by Aphex_D (2006-09-17 10:55:26)

Rogue_Delta
Member
+6|6902
IMO (very H) AMD+nVidia is the way to go ATM; But the smallest E6300 can beat the FX-62 with some standard OC. what do you like better? gameplay or a benchmark champion?
Zimmer
Un Moderador
+1,688|7203|Scotland

MOVED
Maj.Do
Member
+85|7199|good old CA
Right now INtel is the best, so id say go with intel.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7029|SE London

Aphex_D wrote:

Im a AMD+Nvidia Person

Bertster7 wrote:

Maybe get a crossfire system. Or wait for the DX10 cards.
Crossfire fails,
CF  = 3 Cards
SLi = 4 Cards
As am I. I don't like the ATi cards much, but the way nvidia cards can't do HDR and AA is just lame.

Despite that I'd still probably get an nvidia card next.

But the Core 2 Duo is sooooooo much quicker than the current AMD chips it's not even funny. I feel Intel should suffer for their lame attempts with the P4 and the extreme gayness that was Netburst, but they have made an amazingly good CPU to replace it with. AMD however have been resting on their laurels and brought out AM2 which is crap and overpriced, giving very little performance increase.
Phoenix2
Professional Medic Whore
+43|6976|Karkand
According to Maximum PC, the Intel E6800 Conroe is better than the Amd FX-62

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard