im_in_heaven
Member
+27|7044
Ok so everyone who says rank means nothing is only about 25% right. A high rank means the person has played many many hours which means he has alot of experience. Im not saying that every colonel or general is amazing but most are. Some are actually not really good at all.  But i have just noticed that most lower ranks say rank means nothing i guess just to make themselves feel better. We ll it means alot as the person has 100's of hours more experience than you. Flame all you want but its the truth.
GermanLegionaire
...performing headshots!
+46|7040|Hamburg / Germany
U r right, I red something wrong. I need to go to bed.
Rank means shit. xD

Last edited by GermanLegionaire (2006-10-04 13:20:02)

im_in_heaven
Member
+27|7044
yes but you cant say RANK MEANS NOTHING.
LT.Victim
Member
+1,175|7018|British Columbia, Canada
Dont blame your team loosing because the other team has alot of high ranked players that know what the word "teamwork" means"


Blame it on your own team for being a bunch of noobs.
White-Fusion
Fuck
+616|7008|Scotland
wtf that first guy has 5000 odd hours?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7217

rank means nothing?   ..........the answer is yes
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|7105

White-Fusion wrote:

wtf that first guy has 5000 odd hours?
welcome to the world of noob/dork
ELITE-UK
Scratching my back
+170|6930|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND
i personally think rank means alot in a game, you see a bunch of gunnery sergents v a bunch of leautenants, its always the higher ranks who win, they higher ones always know how to do things effectively and win the games and most of the time end up raping the other team to death!
King_County_Downy
shitfaced
+2,791|7053|Seattle

Aren't they killing the rank/score thing pretty soon?
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
jamie_v1.1
Member
+35|6958|Leeds, UK
Higher rank means you get to command above lesser ranked players

So it means plenty!
De_Jappe
Triarii
+432|6983|Belgium

does the word glitch mean anything to you? Time glitch.

It depends, lot of high rankers only care about their own points, while some lower ranked do some nice teamplay, but on the other side: some lower ranks only act noobish while a high ranked guy makes the difference for his team.

It all depends on the person itself, although I agree that more time (no glitch) is more experience
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7086|Washington, DC

King_County_Downy wrote:

Aren't they killing the rank/score thing pretty soon?
That was a hoax. DICE and EA would be firebombed if it got killed within the next year.
King_County_Downy
shitfaced
+2,791|7053|Seattle

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

King_County_Downy wrote:

Aren't they killing the rank/score thing pretty soon?
That was a hoax. DICE and EA would be firebombed if it got killed within the next year.
Cool, thanks. I had a buddy over last night arguing with me about that. I love being right
Sober enough to know what I'm doing, drunk enough to really enjoy doing it
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7194|The Hague, Netherlands

De_Jappe wrote:

does the word glitch mean anything to you? Time glitch.

It depends, lot of high rankers only care about their own points, while some lower ranked do some nice teamplay, but on the other side: some lower ranks only act noobish while a high ranked guy makes the difference for his team.

It all depends on the person itself, although I agree that more time (no glitch) is more experience
I agree, its just :

you got good low rankers
you got good high rankers
you got shitty low rankers
you got shitty high rankers
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
killa_karnickl
Plöt aba Madurah
+34|6899|Austria - Graz
Heaven is right! I don't trust people under a officer rank, especially if its a very precious seat in a Jet oder Heli! I prefer using them alone and being more effective and helpful for my team, than wasting this important piece of warfare to a noob, without a idea how to use the TV oder laser Missiles! Its just a waste of time!
Even in a Squad, i kick them out, because I cant expect any teamwork from them.
They will have more fun alone, than with me.

This sounds quite unfair to lower ranked especially people with a second account (but thats their fault) but I had those guys very often. And well, if u say that everyone was a beginner one time, u are right. But at that time, high experienced players were rare.
ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|6978
i'm a pretty high rank and i'm always the first to say that rank means NOTHING. so what if they've played the game for 1000 hrs, that doesn't always mean that they are better than you in any way. i get owned by first sgts. and lower much more than any generals, colonels, or captains.
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7086|Washington, DC

Rank can mean something.

Good high rank: BushViper
Bad high rank: Blazin.UK
Good low rank: Magnificent^Osk
Bad low rank: labratdays
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|7105

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

Rank can mean something.


Bad high rank: Blazin.UK
wot r u talking about, Blazin is good
killer21
Because f*ck you that's why.
+400|7046|Reisterstown, MD

A high rank doesn't necessarily mean you are good in any way.  It just means that you have played for a while.  I have seen some high ranks that..quite frankly were really bad players.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7217

Well, this will piss a lot of people off, but I do not give a toss.....so here we go ....

From my experience, 95% of the time, high rank players I see are either :

#1  Bunny rabbits
#2  Karkand medic
#3  Karkand medic rabbit
#4  Airplane or helo spawn rape
#5  Any combination of the above


Now, there is nothing wrong if this is the way you want to play, it is your game, do what you want.  But to be honest, most of us are not imprssed by this at all.
Hurricane
Banned
+1,153|7086|Washington, DC

..teddy..jimmy wrote:

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

Rank can mean something.


Bad high rank: Blazin.UK
wot r u talking about, Blazin is good
SPM      4.1032
K/D Ratio      1.0977
Assault Rifles      780:21:28      61,893      48,138      1.2857
Total      1847:20:21

Horrible KDR for that SPM and amount of time played.
turkeybacon
Member
+50|6901|Dragon Valley

usmarine2005 wrote:

Well, this will piss a lot of people off, but I do not give a toss.....so here we go ....

From my experience, 95% of the time, high rank players I see are either :

#1  Bunny rabbits
#2  Karkand medic
#3  Karkand medic rabbit
#4  Airplane or helo spawn rape
#5  Any combination of the above


Now, there is nothing wrong if this is the way you want to play, it is your game, do what you want.  But to be honest, most of us are not imprssed by this at all.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Zefar
Member
+116|7105|Sweden
It depend on what you look at. If his KD ratio is like 0.5 or down to 0.3 he's obviously not good. Unless he's trying to get knife and Shock paddle kills all the time but you would notice that.

Then again those who have high KD ratio often have whored tank and Airplane which will give you loads of kill before you get killed if you play againts noobs.

If you got a high kd while being ground only you are pretty good I'd say. Because almost everything else can rape you. :3
gene_pool
Banned
+519|7077|Gold coast, Aus.
Many people have said, rank CAN mean nothing. But what if its a second accnt? I flew for a seargent and we TORE the enemy apart. And I asked if it was a second accnt. And it was. His first account was a frickin 1 star gen.

(dam, cant find the scnreeny where some gunnery seargent went 35-4 consistently from ground pounding)

And at the conversation about Blazin.UK, i have heard from many, all he does is medic, karkand, g36e.

Last edited by gene_pool (2006-10-04 14:41:31)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard