'Nam?
Imo ww2 weapons simply don't hold the power and technological interest that bf2 strikes a balance with.
If they can do a bf2 on acid for bf3, then I'll be happy:p
If they can do a bf2 on acid for bf3, then I'll be happy:p
BF2 redone with far more different vehicles, balanced sides, specialized maps, more types of weapons and vehicles, stable & smooth engine, and skilled infantry (NO random deviation)
A focus on the less covered wars like The Korean, or the Falklands; timeline of different theatres so there's a mix of different equipment/environments through history. And movable carriers :E
Whats wrong with WWI? There are a million and one WWII games out there.
+1.SargeV1.4 wrote:
BF2 redone with far more different vehicles, balanced sides, specialized maps, more types of weapons and vehicles, stable & smooth engine, and skilled infantry (NO random deviation)
far more different vehicles and specialized maps sound interesting as hell, and a stable and smooth engine would be even more sweet. What do you mean "NO random deviation"?
Im guessing sarge means the guns random deviation as in they aren't accurate enough?lendll wrote:
+1.SargeV1.4 wrote:
BF2 redone with far more different vehicles, balanced sides, specialized maps, more types of weapons and vehicles, stable & smooth engine, and skilled infantry (NO random deviation)
far more different vehicles and specialized maps sound interesting as hell, and a stable and smooth engine would be even more sweet. What do you mean "NO random deviation"?
BF3: Cops vs Robbers
Weapons include tasers, knuckle dusters, capsicum spray and handcuffs. Id buy it
A war on the street.
Weapons include tasers, knuckle dusters, capsicum spray and handcuffs. Id buy it
A war on the street.
WW1, WW2 or modern war.
BF3 should be BF2. A carbon copy of BF2. With EF, AF, and SF. Without all the bad parts of each game. Slightly more fast paced (1.3's infantry combat WAS FINE). Better balancing. More skill needed to do well ( a godly pilot should only get shot down by almost as skilled AA operators or pilots, etc). Better graphics without taking such a toll on the system. Things like fastroping from helos, laser designation, better physics. The old Mashtuur.
All developed by either the good devs at DICE or by Valve.
All developed by either the good devs at DICE or by Valve.
Ever played CS? You can control your recoil. The guns don't just randomly shoot in an increasingly large zone, they follow a pattern and you can land every bullet of a clip in a small area through practice.lendll wrote:
+1.SargeV1.4 wrote:
BF2 redone with far more different vehicles, balanced sides, specialized maps, more types of weapons and vehicles, stable & smooth engine, and skilled infantry (NO random deviation)
far more different vehicles and specialized maps sound interesting as hell, and a stable and smooth engine would be even more sweet. What do you mean "NO random deviation"?
far more types of weaponry: Black Hawks can carry TV-guided missles in real life. a large selection of guns, and not through unlocks, would be great. ONLY if they take the time to balance them out or it'll be AK-47/M4A1 all over again. there's so much stuff used by the military.. although biological weapons and nukes probably won't be a good idea.
Different vehicles for every map: How many different jets are there available in real life? Having one or two per side isn't much fun, a large selection of balanced jets, or choppers, or tanks would make things far more interesting.
Specialized maps: Obviously stuff like infantry only, but how about a very large forest map for snipers? or a huge desert for tank battles?
LT.Victim wrote:
BF3 = BF2 Redone with better engine.. Naval ships, more balanced/thought out..
I'd buy it..
u sure about that? dont u think they might mess it up too?, i personally hate what they did to infantry in 2142SargeV1.4 wrote:
BF2 redone with far more different vehicles, balanced sides, specialized maps, more types of weapons and vehicles, stable & smooth engine, and skilled infantry (NO random deviation)
Last edited by Masterstyle (2006-10-07 08:32:40)
BF3:Gang Wars
On the streets of south central LA. Lowriders, hookers, and cops..... oh, wait, nevermind....
Seriously though, I think that Russia invading the US would be kinda cool... RED DAWN! RED DAWN!
On the streets of south central LA. Lowriders, hookers, and cops..... oh, wait, nevermind....
Seriously though, I think that Russia invading the US would be kinda cool... RED DAWN! RED DAWN!
BF: interplanet wars
Last edited by RDMC(2) (2006-10-07 08:43:58)
I saw somebody say make your own kit while scrolling through this thread quickly and I think it would be a great idea. Think about it, instead of getting unlocks, you get points. You will always have the same amount of points (except for the added points when you rank up) and you could mix and match your weapons to your liking. And the more points you get, the better guns you can unlock, the more ammo/armor you can carry, and the more abilities you have. That would be a pretty cool idea.
BF3 would need more game modes than Conquest. I cant believe they left room for more modes in BF2 and never even made any. I would have been happy with CTF versions of any conquest map, but no...
I agree, using DX10 also, crysis like graphics and individual hit detection like metal gear solid. When a medic heals you, you can see bandages and stuff where you've been shot.LT.Victim wrote:
BF3 = BF2 Redone with better engine.. Naval ships, more balanced/thought out..
I'd buy it..
Also, destructable environments.
drool
You kidding right. You are playing BF2 where US goes head to head with China.WilhelmSissener wrote:
US vs. USSR - No, Just because I do not like fictional fighting.
Some of the mods are trying to go back to ideas where you get to fight ww1,ww2. Christ even civil war mod was work in progress. USSR vs USA was done in operation flash point. Besides you want Russian troops vs Americans, I think POE2 got really close to that.
There is too damn many games about World War II already.
ShadowFoX wrote:
There is too damn many games about World War II already.
Maybe expand into non-US wars/battles like the Afghan-Soviet War, the Chinese Civil War, the Sino-Soviet Border War, etc.
but it sucks because we wont be seeing bf3 for another year or two, that is if they even decide to make another one.
Wrong. BF1942 and BFV were made on the same engine.... BF2 has a new engine, hence the 2. MC is only for the consoles so it doesn't count. 2142 is made on the same engine as BF2 so its not a new game... more like a mod. You fail.MURcarnage wrote:
sigh. when will boobs learn that bf3 is already out? It's called BF2.
BF1 is BF1942 along with all the other expansions
BF2 is BF:Vietnam
BF3 is BF2
BF3.5 can be BF:Modern Combat
BF4 is BF2142
BF5 is BF:Bad Company
So start talking about BF6! We already played BF1942 anyway. I'm sure there's some great mods made or being made for the WW2 era for BF3 (BF2)
Why does BF need to focus on one timeline? Why not just make a game that has a lot if not all the famous battles through out modern history? That way you've got battles from ww1, ww2, korea, vietnam etc... And instead of unlocks, go with that points based system mentioned above. The higher your rank, the more points you've got to select different weapons in each theatre.
First of all, I wouldn't play anything pre-WW2. While most of those historical wars and conflicts have been very influental to what our world looks like today, I don't think stuff like reloading muskets sounds entertaining.
The only thing that would really catch my interest would be even further back in history, say swords, (cross)bows, heavy cavallery and stuff. That would give a whole new meaning to CQB
WW2: Yeah. While it's true that there are a lot of games in that scenario already, there's always place for a really well done one. Also, I think there's a number of great scenarios that haven't been dealed with yet that much as far as videogames are concerned.
Vietnam: I tend to say "yeah". I like the scenario and the weapons, but thinking of jungle maps as seen in "Soldier of Fortune" or "Men of Valor" makes me feel dizzy.
Somalia: Good setting, seems to yell for city maps.
But what about other stuff, maybe even a scenario based game like "Delta Force" was? Something like Beirut in the early 80s (Marines vs. Insurgents), Panama conflict, Falkland Islands, Kosovo Conflict etc.
The only thing that would really catch my interest would be even further back in history, say swords, (cross)bows, heavy cavallery and stuff. That would give a whole new meaning to CQB
WW2: Yeah. While it's true that there are a lot of games in that scenario already, there's always place for a really well done one. Also, I think there's a number of great scenarios that haven't been dealed with yet that much as far as videogames are concerned.
Vietnam: I tend to say "yeah". I like the scenario and the weapons, but thinking of jungle maps as seen in "Soldier of Fortune" or "Men of Valor" makes me feel dizzy.
Somalia: Good setting, seems to yell for city maps.
But what about other stuff, maybe even a scenario based game like "Delta Force" was? Something like Beirut in the early 80s (Marines vs. Insurgents), Panama conflict, Falkland Islands, Kosovo Conflict etc.
Proud member of a dead community.