MaRine[M24]
Member
+3|6839
My FPS drops a bit in heavy combat, but certainly not the point of being unplayable. My lowest is around 44FPS from what i've seen. I currently have 1GB DDR400. I average around 60FPS w/ All medium settings, but in combat, it hits the mid 40's.

Besides being able to play with "high textures" will I notice a large performance boost?
I suspect the performance drop in combat is CPU related and not exactly RAM related. If i'm wrong please correct me.

Specs-
x800GTO 256MB
1GB DDR400
AMD 64 3200+

Last edited by MaRine[M24] (2006-11-01 20:45:52)

DeCon_1
Member
+16|6973|Atlanta, Georga U.S.A.
Well the processor is alright but it would be better to have two gigs of ram. Most new games are memory hogs, especially BF2, so it would be the best to upgrade your ram.
agent146
Member
+127|6839|Jesus Land aka Canada
i remembered when my brother lend me his extra 1gb thus i have 2 gb and i swear to you. Bf2 ran sooo much smoother, it loaded the game faster, and i can enter my favourite 64 man server in a 22-40 secs. Compared to my 1gb it took about 1minute + so enter and 4 minutes to load the game itself. Plus wiht 2 gb i was able to play on middle-high setttingS more smoothly
Jbrar
rawr
+86|6994|Winterpeg, Canada
You'll notice the difference. The weekend before last I picked up another 1 gig stick (was lucky that it was identical to the one I had aleady, pc3200 @ 400mhz). Just today I boosted my settings from all Low to Medium, plays just as smooth as low with a decent fps, same as usual.
fatmarik
Member
+23|7034|Anywhere i am needed
check out m specs, i run all on ultra high, with still 120+ fps (never drops below 112)
Processor:     
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz (2 CPUs)---> oced to 3.66 GHz
Memory:    
2gb ddr2 5400 667mhz in dual channel configuration
Hard Drive:    
160 GB
Video Card:    
MSI NX7900 GT (NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT) :-)
Monitor:    
37 inch olevia hd montior/ tv
Sound Card:    
SoundMAX HD Audio
=EKF=xDoctorx
Member
+0|6839|Belgium
Bragging around heh...
Alrighty I'll join

CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Box
2 X 2.4Ghz
4Mb L2 Cache
.065µ Technology 65W
64bits, SSE1/2/3/4, MMX, NX-Bit
Genuine Intel Cooler (Ask for another one if necessary)
Core 2 E6600 is more powerful than Athlon FX-62 !

Graphic Adapter : ATI Radeon X1950 Pro
PRO Version : Core : 580Mhz, RAM : 1400Mhz
256bits, up to 48 Pixel Processors
256Mb GDDR3
Better Performance than GeForce 7900GT

Memory : 2Gb DDR2-667
MDT Quality CL4 240pin
2 x 1Gb Dual Channel

Mainboard :
AsRock Conroe 945G s775

Conroe Ready
FSB1066
Max 4Gb RAM
4 x DDR2-533/666 Slots
4 x SATA2
1 x IDE / Floppy
10/100/1000 LAN
Realtek ALC888 7.1

HDD : Samsung 250Gb SATA-2
SATA-2 Interface (up to 300Mb/s)
8Mb Cache
7200rpm (Latency 8.9ms)

DVD : Samsung DVD+/-RW DL 16x
IDE Interface
Dual Layer
CD/DVD +/-RW Read and Write up to 48x (CD) / 16x (DVD)

Power Supply : 350W Quiet with P4 features 12cm fan

Case : Aerocool : You pick the model among models shown below
High Quality Models
USB/Audio Front
Quiet

[img]http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h212/hmmontrieux/769db6c1.jpg[/img]
DeCon_1
Member
+16|6973|Atlanta, Georga U.S.A.
Dude don't make me pull out my guns and destroy you.
(Look in sig below )
arabeater
Do you have any idea how fooking busy I am?
+49|7133|Colorado Springs, CO

DeCon_1 wrote:

Dude don't make me pull out my guns and destroy you.
(Look in sig below )
Yes that sounds nice and all but how much did all that set you back?

BTW Where in Atlanta are you from?

I am from Atl myself but I am stationed in Oklahoma at the moment.

Last edited by arabeater (2006-11-01 23:02:17)

Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|7227|Noizyland

=EKF=xDoctorx wrote:

Bragging around heh...
Alrighty I'll join
...
Wow. Uh, fuck you.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6843

Damn.  Everyone's got a better system.  Oh well, it was to be expected.
-101-InvaderZim
Member
+42|7296|Waikato, Aotearoa
Get another gig of RAM. Load times for maps will be reduced from minutes to seconds (well about 10 anyway).
Not to mention general PC performance will improve too
For me when I had 1 gig RAM load times were typically about 2-3 minutes. Now its about 10-15 SECONDS.
Twist
Too old to be doing this sh*t
+103|6975|Little blue planet, milky way
You can get a pretty decent performance form a very low cost computer.
The trick is to get a lot of mem (as the thread indicates). Memory will, as others have pointed out, ensure that you get faster loading, This is very handy. I haven't noticed any increase in FPS as a result of more memory, but that could be because of my initally very high FPS.
Also you have to get a decent mobo. Make sure it has PCI-e. PCI-e is SOOOOO much faster than AGP, and the GPU is of critical importance to BF2. A 6600 card in AGP on an Asus board, vs a 6600 PCI-e on an Asrock board (asus, budget label) will give me the ability to move from medium to high settings with 100% view distance !
The last and most important thing is the card. PCI-e is a MUST. This will also mean that you can upgrade to DX10 later, as DX10 will only be available for PCI-e. Get a good GPU. Dont look at the meory of the board, or the memory speed. Look at the GPU throughput. This is the most important. I have a 6600 which can run things on high (albeit with some lag on certain maps and situations. Genrally, I disables dynamic lighting and shadows for best performance), and a 7800 which will run EVERYthing smoothly, regardless of combat, mas, settings etc. I upgraded to be able to play GRAW, but the benefits in BF2 were REALLY noticable. My main PC is running on a 7900GTX, and has no problems either, but this is a high performance setup at a higher price.

The "budget" machine cost me something like:
Harddrive: I had a few lying around, with one for windows and one for apps, it runs fast. From £15 pr drive used.
DVDdrive: I payed about £30 for a new 16x DVD burner, save cash and get one used from £5
Case: About £30. Save cash and get one used from around £10
PSU: A nice 420w hiperX PSU. Ran me about £45 (dont buy a PSU used, unless you know it's still good)
GPU: A 7800 hybrid card. Not brand name, but with high throughput. Cost me about £90. (dont buy used, you may need warranty !)
CPU: Old P4-2.6 Ghz. Had this lying around. New/used price around £50, used is ok if you can save a lot
Mem: 2 1GB acer sticks. 400Mhz About £80 (dont buy used, you may need warranty)
Mobo: A reasonably fast Asrock flex ATX/BTX board. I payed like £50 for it (with PCI-e !)
FDD: Used an old one. Really no FDD is needed, but I like to have it. New/used from £5
Fans: I had a couple of old Zalmans that went with the CPU. New/used price from £5
Cables and screws: I had a lot lying around, but pick up what you need from the local PC shop. About £5

so total cost for a machine that will run BF2 on high settings with load times of less than 30 sec pr map and DX10 ready:
£300-450 !!!!!!

Now there are a few downsides to a budget PC like this:
* The cheap board will only hold two memory modules. so upgrading mem is not likely to happen. Spending another £50 on the board will get you that option.
* The harddrives are OK, but not exceptional at this price. You can get something faster. Look for 7200+ RPM and SATA-II
* The PSU will not like SLi and crossfire, so dont even try.
* The CPU is ok for gaming and computing needs. It's not the fastest around, but it WILL work just fine.
* The Graphics card is a no name card with just the most "bang for the buck" GPU I could find. This is a wise choice if you're looking at a DX10 upgrade in the near future.
* While this config is fairly silent, I was lucky with the fans, also because of the low requirements of the old CPU and (relatively) low wattage GPU. You may need to spend a little on some good/better fans if you want this thing to be really quiet.


Now to return to the subject of the memory. When I upgraded the PC I just talked about to the new mobo and the PCI-e 7800, I had a problem. My problem being that the OLD board had 4 memory slots, where the new one had only 2 ! So I had to play with just 1 GB for a LONG time (ok, 5 days, and it was my friend using that machine, not me. But you get the picture), before making the difficult choice of upgrading to 2 GB (another £80 forkover after buying the Mobo and GPU).
My immediate observations were:
Starting BF2 went from 2-4 minutes down to less than 1.
Loading maps went from more than a minute to around a half.
I had fewer problems (less lag) with the multiplayer "lobby"


So in conclusion... 2GB comared to 1 GB can make a WORLD of difference. But you have to have enough hardware to UTILIZE the extra memory !
MECtallica
Member
+73|6956|jalalabad
for those saying they have over 100FPS

shut the fuck up, game caps at 100
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7168

MECtallica wrote:

for those saying they have over 100FPS

shut the fuck up, game caps at 100
You can change the cap settings.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
fierce
I love [fiSh]
+167|7020

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

MECtallica wrote:

for those saying they have over 100FPS

shut the fuck up, game caps at 100
You can change the cap settings.
game.lockFps
the_outsider38
Microsoft Poster Child
+83|7146|Vancouver BC Canada
Yea, but anything over the monitors supported frequency (Hz) is just a waste. And I still cant get 2142 to run maxed out....BF2 bounces off the 100FPS limiter, but 2142 is at like 30....

But i get 7000+ in 3D mark 06.....

Last edited by the_outsider38 (2006-11-02 01:52:17)

MaRine[M24]
Member
+3|6839
Loading times arent neccasarily an issue. I can load a 64 man server & verify in under a minute. I'm looking for performance gains while playing. One gentlmen above stated he got no FPS boost off 2GB RAM, so are heavy firefights more CPU & GPU intense?

If i'm away from fighting, like on the other side of the map, my FPS is over 80, and as I get closer it gradually drops and normally hovers around mid 40's when involved in the fighting itself.

I still can't figure out why the FPS drop is so pronounced and noticable. 80 > 60 would be fine, but a big 40FPS drop sounds like a lot.

Last edited by MaRine[M24] (2006-11-02 09:06:25)

heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6840|New York
naturally, just check your fps as you're running around an empty part of the map. then compare it with a firefight. you're fps will go down due to the increased load put on the cpu and gpu.


dammit you edited, so now i have to.

it also depends on how many things you have going on. sometimes i'll lose like 20 fps or so when it's me and a few other things. but bombing runs and many ppl puts some strain on my system, dropping it even further.

Last edited by heggs (2006-11-02 09:11:27)

Remember Me As A Time Of Day
MaRine[M24]
Member
+3|6839
So what can I do to maintain a consistent FPS? I know FPS will drop, but I hate when it drops so much. 85 >80 would be fine or even 80 > 70, but I cant stand the huge FPS drops.

Any tweaks or little things I can do to maintain a more consistent FPS?
heggs
Spamalamadingdong
+581|6840|New York
drop your settings down a bit or get another gig of ram. even tho he said that the ram really didnt help him, it's a good thing to have if you can afford it. especially dual channel. it should allow things to run smoother and load up faster.

Last edited by heggs (2006-11-02 09:24:00)

Remember Me As A Time Of Day
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7188|Salt Lake City

That X800GTO is a decent card, but in times of heavy combat with lots of players, vehicles, and or smoke/arty going on the FPS are going to drop unless you ease up on the settings.  However, I did go from 1GB to 1.5GB and did notice the game ran a bit better.  However, I don't think it will solve your FPS drops to the extent that you want.
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6945|N. Ireland
exact same as my old comp. specs, spooky! did you buy it off ebay per chance?
MaRine[M24]
Member
+3|6839

leetkyle wrote:

exact same as my old comp. specs, spooky! did you buy it off ebay per chance?
Newegg.com
I built it.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7218|Cambridge (UK)

the_outsider38 wrote:

Yea, but anything over the monitors supported frequency (Hz) is just a waste. And I still cant get 2142 to run maxed out....BF2 bounces off the 100FPS limiter, but 2142 is at like 30....

But i get 7000+ in 3D mark 06.....
No it's not wasted. You may not see those the whole of those intervening frames and you may get tearing, but the game is running faster - basically the framerate isn't just the rate at which it updates the graphics - it's the rate that the entire game updates.

Oh, and anyone that stills thinks that 2GB is no better than 1GB (particularly those that have 2GB themselves) - get yourself over to the UK, come visit lovely Cambridge, and I'll introduce to the baseball bat that I would really like to bury in your face...

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-11-02 14:26:13)

Brasso
member
+1,549|7082

Ty wrote:

=EKF=xDoctorx wrote:

Bragging around heh...
Alrighty I'll join
...
Wow. Uh, fuck you.
Yes, please.  This isn't a bragging thread, it's a "is 2 Gb of RAM better than 1 Gb?"
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard