Gravity
Infantry Whore
+37|7293
Well... Whats the best monitor thats like, 20inch widescreen for the money? that has a name i can trust...
Any Suggestions?
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|7085|USA
anything with sony on it. ive got a 17" sony, rocks my socks off. costs about 250$ lcd
p3lvicthrust
Banned
+16|6854
Samsung Syncmaster 20.1" LCD 4ms response time 350+
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7115|under there hayousaidunderwear
I would say samsung and sony are both good.  I have a dell monitor and love it.

Mabye reading this will help you narrow down a monitor

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=51320
younggun
Member
+28|7096
Dell E207WFP 20.1" monitor for like $280 is one of the best deals out there right now.

Limited time thing so I would jump on it unless you can find a better one cheaper AR or something.
1NfE5T
I'll sleep when i'm dead
+11|7169|Houston,Texas
Samsung SyncMaster 940BW 19'' Widescreen  paid $200 at BestBuy. Was on sale that day, regular price was like $259.99
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7295|Alberta, Canada

I've got a NEC 17" LCD1712.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7001|UK

I just received the 23'' apple widescreen for my christmas (as part of my new computer) and hooked it up to this old rig and its friggen AWSOME!  However, buddy of mine has the samsung (same one 1NfE5T mentioned) and swears buy it, I agree, its a very good monitor, but for widesceen u need over 21'' imho.

Martyn
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7033|SE London

20.1" Belinea 10 20 35W. That's what I went with, it's very nice. Whatever you get make sure you check out some reliable reviews first.
Sgt_Sieg
"Bow Chicka Bow Wow." The correct way.
+89|7227
I have a 17 inch LG Flatron Slim. Amazing flatpanel I have to say.
NiMhurchu
Suicide Operations
+13|7300|Germany
I always wonder why you guys have the fastest CPUs, the topmost graphic cards, defragmented harddisks built into a RAID and then -- use cordless input devices or, in this case, LC displays.
LC displays might have a faster response time compared to, say, a year ago, but still not as fast as a CRT. But the real problem is the latency, i. e. the "speed" your graphics adapter can send the signals to the display and vice versa. CRTs are very much faster there. The same, btw, with cordless mice and keyboards.

Last edited by NiMhurchu (2006-11-05 16:27:17)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7053|132 and Bush

NiMhurchu wrote:

I always wonder why you guys have the fastest CPUs, the topmost graphic cards, defragmented harddisks built into a RAID and then -- use cordless input devices or, in this case, LC displays.
LC displays might have a faster response time compared to, say, a year ago, but still not as fast as a CRT. But the real problem is the latency, i. e. the "speed" your graphics adapter can send the signals to the display and vice versa. CRTs are very much faster there. The same, btw, with cordless mice and keyboards.
6 ms is plenty fast enough on my 24' Dell not to mention digital and HDMI compliant. Also most high end machines are not strictly used for gaming. Anyone who spends 5k+ on a machine only to use a couple 50 dollars games has serious issues .
http://our2142.com/images/dell.png

Last edited by Kmarion (2006-11-06 05:48:21)

Xbone Stormsurgezz
CrazeD
Member
+368|7125|Maine
There's a 19" widescreen Acer on newegg for 190$ USD.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a … 6824009092
misconfiguration
GURU
+86|6848|Indianapolis, IN

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard