i come back to see that noobs still remain. i dont mean jackass noobs, i mean people who play so horribly that there must have been 20 cats constantly jumping on their keyboards.
pathetic.
pathetic.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- so after a month long break from bf2,
Well, in that second screenshot you have the most deaths on your team so who's the noob?
Dying means nothing. It's the killing that counts.
try a server with more than 10 people on it?
i did. still got 1st. didnt SS it though.T0rr3nt wrote:
try a server with more than 10 people on it?
Was gonna say the same thing. Nothing impressive about those screenshots.T0rr3nt wrote:
try a server with more than 10 people on it?
Judging by his score it looks like he came pretty close to winning the round single handedly who care if he died more?Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
Well, in that second screenshot you have the most deaths on your team so who's the noob?
He had about 8 points each time he died, the guy below him had the second best score/death with like 3 points per death.
hiding in the corner of the map doing nothing doesn't make you good, the more you doing the more you will get killed.
wow omgz u soo fukin leet
I end up in 1-5 all the time and u dont amze me one bit with your ''too leet for u nubs talk''
I end up in 1-5 all the time and u dont amze me one bit with your ''too leet for u nubs talk''
it is when 2nd place is 80 points awaykiller21 wrote:
Was gonna say the same thing. Nothing impressive about those screenshots.T0rr3nt wrote:
try a server with more than 10 people on it?
Try doing that with good players in the server instead of rookies who just started playing. Again, nothing about those screenshots impress me.Trigger_Happy_92 wrote:
it is when 2nd place is 80 points away
thats the point, noobs are playing bf2 when they should have gone to 2142killer21 wrote:
Try doing that with good players in the server instead of rookies who just started playing.Trigger_Happy_92 wrote:
it is when 2nd place is 80 points away
Also in the first lolAjax_the_Great1 wrote:
Well, in that second screenshot you have the most deaths on your team so who's the noob?
WE all do thatTrigger_Happy_92 wrote:
i did. still got 1st. didnt SS it though.T0rr3nt wrote:
try a server with more than 10 people on it?
The effectivity of your skill comes when you play in a full 64 man server.
No.Child molesters are pathetic.Even rapists are pathetic.Trigger_Happy_92 wrote:
pathetic.
But people not very good at a game?My first words says it all.
Wrong, 64 player determines your ability to spam grenades, armour whore and shoot people while they kill others.Yaocelotl wrote:
The effectivity of your skill comes when you play in a full 64 man server.
Real skill is determined by who wins in a 1v1.
This is true, on 64 player server you have more luck involved then everything else.Towelly wrote:
Wrong, 64 player determines your ability to spam grenades, armour whore and shoot people while they kill others.Yaocelotl wrote:
The effectivity of your skill comes when you play in a full 64 man server.
Real skill is determined by who wins in a 1v1.
no, its skill, that tank cannon wont move down alleys its selffierce wrote:
This is true, on 64 player server you have more luck involved then everything else.Towelly wrote:
Wrong, 64 player determines your ability to spam grenades, armour whore and shoot people while they kill others.Yaocelotl wrote:
The effectivity of your skill comes when you play in a full 64 man server.
Real skill is determined by who wins in a 1v1.
oh yeah, 64 player server, with about 54 people
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/ … backer.jpg
dont tell me getting that score with a linebacker deosnt take skill, Especially when the tanks and apcs dont kill the toher tanks and apcs, I even fraps'd it
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v303/ … backer.jpg
dont tell me getting that score with a linebacker deosnt take skill, Especially when the tanks and apcs dont kill the toher tanks and apcs, I even fraps'd it
Last edited by DirtyMexican (2006-11-18 16:18:20)
Your deaths per minute increases in 64 player servers. 1vs1 would be additive, but 64 player is FUN and addictive.
Wrong, lags and is all luck.JaggedPanther wrote:
Your deaths per minute increases in 64 player servers. 1vs1 would be additive, but 64 player is FUN and addictive.
I had a break of 6 weeks and came back to find it's mostly about being in the air, tank or apc and people moan like fuck, even more than before. Speshully when I arty the carrier at wake.
well arent you just the gaming god? i see morons that rate themselves and other people by video game scores still remain too.
TruthMiller wrote:
Wrong, lags and is all luck.JaggedPanther wrote:
Your deaths per minute increases in 64 player servers. 1vs1 would be additive, but 64 player is FUN and addictive.
32-48 player servers is good.
I hate playing with newbs because the server always tend be un-even or goes empty twords the ending of the map due to them disconnecting.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- so after a month long break from bf2,