Aircraft should land to re-arm/repair

2006-12-14 21:27:58

#1

markzed: Member; +5|6653

I reckon that it would be better if they had to land, press a button to perform a 180 degree direction switch then wait for as long as a typical repair before taking off.

This would;

a) Reduce the scoring blowouts by experienced jet whores. It would take them longer to get back into baseraping position. It would balance out the overall scoring.

b) Increases their vulnerability period (ie. stationary on the tarmac).

c) Increase the realism.

d) Improve relations amongst jet whores (whores get a better rotation because you're bound to get TK'd when you land for a re-arm = new pilot.

* Squad members could possibly defend the plane for points (similar to flag).
* You could even force an Engineer to repair, which means you need an Eng. in your squad.

What do you think?

2006-12-14 21:29:20

#2

Yaocelotl: :D; +221|6922|Keyboard

no

2006-12-14 21:30:14

#3

markzed: Member; +5|6653

Yaocelotl wrote:
no

Short and straight to the point- I'd Karma you if I had any...

2006-12-15 03:33:32

#4

cohen1976: Member; +14|7040

Yaocelotl wrote:
no

2006-12-15 03:35:33

#5

Janysc: Member; +59|6955|Norway

cohen1976 wrote:
Yaocelotl wrote:
no

2006-12-15 03:38:12

#6

Fenris_GreyClaw: Real Хорошо; +826|6792|Adelaide, South Australia

Yes.

2006-12-15 03:39:34

#7

Boogeyman81: BOO!!!; +26|6906|Newcastle NSW Australia

Yes

2006-12-15 03:42:56

#8

TigerXtrm: Death by Indecency; +51|6641|Netherlands

Janysc wrote:
cohen1976 wrote:
Yaocelotl wrote:
no

2006-12-15 03:51:00

#9

pedigreeuk: I'm English, not British!; +113|7043|Rotherham, England

no

2006-12-15 03:53:12

#10

Fenris_GreyClaw: Real Хорошо; +826|6792|Adelaide, South Australia

Can any of you people provide reasons as to why not? the OP has already got the arguments 'for', i want to see someone 'against'!

2006-12-15 04:29:16

#11

Spiers.ckz: Member; +10|6801

because we like it like is is now, no futher reason needed.

How about reparing then tanks then?? i think they should be taken apart in a workshop to make it more real.

And for maximum realism troops should not be allowed to respawn.

We like the game the way it is!

2006-12-15 04:32:36

#12

Ki][mE: OMG H4XOR!; +51|6835|I'm a Viking....Norway

yes!

finally someone with a brain. EA get the realism back into the game!

2006-12-15 04:35:05

#13

Warlord: Divine Ruler; +37|6654|Afghanistan

Cool idea ...

~ W

2006-12-15 04:42:06

#14

0akleaves: Member; +183|6886|Newcastle UK

I would love it more noobs and there easier to kill with my jet. Since i barley take missile damage as most of my jet deaths are my connection timing out.

You have to learn the rules of the game and then you have to play better than anyone else.

2006-12-15 04:42:27

#15

-=5TON3D: Member; +42|6807|u.k

No
because theres way to many assholes in the team that just sit in the main base tk'ing trying to piss people off.
its bad enough trying to get off the ground in the first place in a jet with all the tard's under your wheels,it'd be a nightmare having to put up with that every time you had to repair/rearm.
the magority of people that will say YES either hardly fly or hate jets lol.

2006-12-15 04:42:36

#16

Longbow: Member; +163|6919|Odessa, Ukraine

No. Landed jet = raped to shit jet .

p/s I'm not a Jet whore , if you dont trust me , check my stats .

2006-12-15 04:46:58

#17

Warlord: Divine Ruler; +37|6654|Afghanistan

How about a stratotanker then?

~ W

2006-12-15 05:49:08

#18

Machinegunman73: Member; +2|6735|Oshkosh Wi.

Hell Ya!!

2006-12-15 09:34:02

#19

SuperMike: Banned; +11|6732|KENT

YES - I loath those jet whore s.o.b.'s so damn BORING to see em loop the runway
and keep bombing my ass off before i can Leg it.
Make the bastards land for 2 minutes so I can arty their asses (_!_) lol./

2006-12-15 09:37:17

#20

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6837|Area 51

While we're at it..lets nerf the supply packages that magically can carry anything even tank shells..that friggin unrealistic..!
And lets nerf the medic bags as well since stupid meds packs can make bullet wounds disappear, that aint realistic as well.. /sarcasm...

Ki][mE wrote:
yes!

finally someone with a brain. EA get the realism back into the game!

Realism...and Game, that are TWO THINGS THAT DO NOT, I SAY DO NOT MATCH! Simulators are meant for REALISM..not games...

Last edited by RDMC(2) (2006-12-15 09:38:38)

2006-12-15 09:46:00

#21

HeavyMetalDave: Metal Godz; +107|6930|California

Great Idea!!!!

Too bad it wont happen..

Thats why I went to 2142..

No fear of the whore in the skies...

2006-12-15 09:46:42

#22

']['error: Banned; +630|6916|The Netherlands

Janysc wrote:
cohen1976 wrote:
Yaocelotl wrote:
no

2006-12-15 09:51:58

#23

Ajax_the_Great1: Dropped on request; +206|6919

You damn pussies, stfu about the jets. It's hard enough to line up bomb drops as it is. Unless you use the bombers.

2006-12-16 02:14:34

#24

markzed: Member; +5|6653

Spiers.ckz wrote:
We like the game the way it is!

Based on the complaint threads and patches, it seems like 'we' is a minority.

No bother. Just an idea. As you were, soldier.

RDMC(2) wrote:
Simulators are meant for REALISM..not games

Try and tell that to EA and see how far you get. I laugh in your direction.

2006-12-16 02:23:23

#25

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6837|Area 51

RDMC(2) wrote:
Simulators are meant for REALISM..not games

Try and tell that to EA and see how far you get. I laugh in your direction.

You silly son of a person! I fart in your direction!

No fear of the whore in the skies...

No, but the thought of 3 tanks and 2 battlewalkers roling towards me makes me feel much more safer I guess..

Last edited by RDMC(2) (2006-12-16 02:24:57)

BF2S Forums Aircraft should land to re-arm/repair

Yaocelotl wrote:

Yaocelotl wrote:

cohen1976 wrote:

Yaocelotl wrote:

Janysc wrote:

cohen1976 wrote:

Yaocelotl wrote:

Ki][mE wrote:

Janysc wrote:

cohen1976 wrote:

Yaocelotl wrote:

Spiers.ckz wrote:

RDMC(2) wrote:

RDMC(2) wrote:

Board footer