really, like what?TeamZephyr wrote:
What the hell are you talking about?lowing wrote:
Sorry Bubbalo, all anyone can read in your posts is smart ass. Your main defense against a point proven against your posts is some wild ass "what if" scenerio, that barely fits into the discussion, like that gem you are pulling in the "self defense" thread, where I say I have a right to self defense and you try and argue that a criminal has the same right when approached by a cop, or to take the meaning of a post and dissect it until it has lost its original meaning and been reshaped into something that is obviously wrong, so you can sit on your perch and shit all over it. IE. If I posted "The US is fighting Islamic radicalism because it is wrong", you would post, " Oh really, then how do you explain what your country did to the American Indians 150 years ago? You never ever, take a post and its meaning for face value or give credit to the poster for the gest of the post. You are one of the worst, in regards to trying to get someone to define "IS".Bubbalo wrote:
Oh yes, because running around not telling me why you think I'm wrong and instead accuse me of double talk is a really mature way to debate.
Jan 1st, go ahead and line my name out.
Your picking up stuff from the cosmos, it's not even fucking there.
For one, apparently he can read more into my posts than smart ass.lowing wrote:
really, like what?TeamZephyr wrote:
What the hell are you talking about?lowing wrote:
Sorry Bubbalo, all anyone can read in your posts is smart ass. Your main defense against a point proven against your posts is some wild ass "what if" scenerio, that barely fits into the discussion, like that gem you are pulling in the "self defense" thread, where I say I have a right to self defense and you try and argue that a criminal has the same right when approached by a cop, or to take the meaning of a post and dissect it until it has lost its original meaning and been reshaped into something that is obviously wrong, so you can sit on your perch and shit all over it. IE. If I posted "The US is fighting Islamic radicalism because it is wrong", you would post, " Oh really, then how do you explain what your country did to the American Indians 150 years ago? You never ever, take a post and its meaning for face value or give credit to the poster for the gest of the post. You are one of the worst, in regards to trying to get someone to define "IS".
Jan 1st, go ahead and line my name out.
Your picking up stuff from the cosmos, it's not even fucking there.
Yeah, that MUST be it. Forget I said anything.Bubbalo wrote:
For one, apparently he can read more into my posts than smart ass.lowing wrote:
really, like what?TeamZephyr wrote:
What the hell are you talking about?
Your picking up stuff from the cosmos, it's not even fucking there.
Why would I let you get off that easy?
Like this.....lowing wrote:
really, like what?
lowing wrote:
If I posted "The US is fighting Islamic radicalism because it is wrong", you would post, " Oh really, then how do you explain what your country did to the American Indians 150 years ago?
C'mon, bubbalo, have you ever known me want to be let off easy?Bubbalo wrote:
Why would I let you get off that easy?
A perfect example of bubbalo's tactics, what don't you understand about it?TeamZephyr wrote:
Like this.....lowing wrote:
really, like what?lowing wrote:
If I posted "The US is fighting Islamic radicalism because it is wrong", you would post, " Oh really, then how do you explain what your country did to the American Indians 150 years ago?
Every time you look like an idiot you tell people to forget about. So yeah, I'd have to say so.
So much for this thread's point.
LOL, I can't think of one example where I cowered from an argument from you or anyone else with a "oh forget about it". I won't ask you to show me since that would be alot of digging, unless you know of an example right off.Bubbalo wrote:
Every time you look like an idiot you tell people to forget about. So yeah, I'd have to say so.
You guys are derailing a thread that I had hoped would have a positive influence on the forums.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
lol, HE started it!!!
The really funny part is lowing started it, and he's one of the one's who signed on. But okay, I'll stop. Sorry for upsetting you.
Edit:
Edit:
lowing wrote:
LOL, I can't think of one example where I cowered from an argument from you or anyone else with a "oh forget about it". I won't ask you to show me since that would be alot of digging, unless you know of an example right off.Bubbalo wrote:
Every time you look like an idiot you tell people to forget about. So yeah, I'd have to say so.
Ok, I'm done now.lowing wrote:
Yeah, that MUST be it. Forget I said anything.Bubbalo wrote:
For one, apparently he can read more into my posts than smart ass.lowing wrote:
really, like what?
Last edited by Bubbalo (2007-01-01 05:24:22)
LOL, yeah, and??? face value bubbalo, why is your dissection needed??Bubbalo wrote:
Of what? You weren't apologising for doing the wrong thing in response to a post, you were apologising for misinterpreting the post.lowing wrote:
another example^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Bubbalo wrote:
Yes, he's sorry that he accidently broke the rules because he disagreed with someone and then found out they didn't say what he thought they said, and that makes it all better. Until he disagrees with them again.
Sorry bubbalo, that post was sarcasm and patronizing and even if it wasn't, you suggest it "happens every time" as if it has happened before.Bubbalo wrote:
The really funny part is lowing started it, and he's one of the one's who signed on. But okay, I'll stop. Sorry for upsetting you.
Edit:lowing wrote:
LOL, I can't think of one example where I cowered from an argument from you or anyone else with a "oh forget about it". I won't ask you to show me since that would be alot of digging, unless you know of an example right off.Bubbalo wrote:
Every time you look like an idiot you tell people to forget about. So yeah, I'd have to say so.Ok, I'm done now.lowing wrote:
Yeah, that MUST be it. Forget I said anything.Bubbalo wrote:
For one, apparently he can read more into my posts than smart ass.
Question: who's going to decide when people have broken it and get scratched off?
Lowing, Bubbalo (mostly bub) STFU.
I agree
I argue, I mean I agree.
Wikipedia can be used to cite sources because the sources inside the articles are cited from other sources. That site is monitored almost around the clock with very few fuckups.Invaderzim wrote:
I think another point should be added to the list: WIKIPEDIA cannot be used to support an argument! dear god that site shits me to tears.
It's too biased, though.SysTray wrote:
Wikipedia can be used to cite sources because the sources inside the articles are cited from other sources. That site is monitored almost around the clock with very few fuckups.Invaderzim wrote:
I think another point should be added to the list: WIKIPEDIA cannot be used to support an argument! dear god that site shits me to tears.
Anyone can edit it. Have you guys ever seen the ban list...lolBubbalo wrote:
It's too biased, though.SysTray wrote:
Wikipedia can be used to cite sources because the sources inside the articles are cited from other sources. That site is monitored almost around the clock with very few fuckups.Invaderzim wrote:
I think another point should be added to the list: WIKIPEDIA cannot be used to support an argument! dear god that site shits me to tears.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
My earlier question was serious, btw. Not everyone will bow themselves out. Not that I think any of this is going to make much difference, but I'm curious.
The point is there is a ban list. You have to give it the benefit of the doubt and accept is as true unless you can prove it false, I think....
so.......hung.......over
Malloy must go