Linus
Member
+53|7098
Game server providers should only allow one 2142 game on a 100mbit port with more then 32+
players.  I have 36 2142 servers running from my data center in St Louis. Any more than 32 Players
and the players will see lag.  Many game server providers, including MOST ALL of the well known ones
are overbooking their 100mbit ports.. Sadly, not even a 100mbit port dedicated can run a 64 player 2142
server very well.

I tried over 100 servers in the past 2 days from my 2.4gbit connection at the office, all of them were
40+ players, ALL of them had noticable lag.  If your GSP is running 2 BF2142 servers on one box youre
getting overbooked.  2-16s ok. 2-20s ok... but 40 players is about it per box with this game.

I wont mention any names, but a couple pf the bigger Game Server Providers are absolutely the worst
in the business about overloading their boxes. I know one, in particular who tries to run 3 2142's and
if you join the servers he sells you will notice immediately.

Just be sure to demand no lag from your GSPs. EA once again is making them give freebie boxes so
theyre only trying to make up for it by cramming as much on one box as possible. I myself do not
rent less than 32 player servers.  1 game per box. Runs smooth. Otherwise, LAG
Avantek
Banned
+7|6793|New York
My clan runs a BF2 server which is 20 players and a 2142 server which is 32 players on the same box and it runs smoothly.
Ninja_Monkey
I TK For Blackhawks
+60|7010|UK
he said 40+ ........
PhaxeNor
:D
+119|6861|Norway | Unkown
SAF had a 48 man BF2142 server, our was running great. Didn't get any lagg at all..
Ender2309
has joined the GOP
+470|7016|USA

SAF.Phaxe wrote:

SAF had a 48 man BF2142 server, our was running great. Didn't get any lagg at all..
*TA* had a 48 man (i believe its 52 now) running 2142, never laggy at all, and we don't have a ping kick.
PhaxeNor
:D
+119|6861|Norway | Unkown

Ender2309 wrote:

SAF.Phaxe wrote:

SAF had a 48 man BF2142 server, our was running great. Didn't get any lagg at all..
*TA* had a 48 man (i believe its 52 now) running 2142, never laggy at all, and we don't have a ping kick.
We have 2 members that live in the US. The only thing they are saying by lagg is becuase the server is in UK/Europe.. But they didn't have any game lagg like some have been having on low ping server
Avantek
Banned
+7|6793|New York

Ninja_Monkey wrote:

he said 40+ ........
20+32=52
52>40
52 falls into the category of 40+...
CrimsonFury
Member
+1|7224
There is no way a single 2142 server of any size uses 100mbps. If the server was lagging it was because of system limits (CPU\RAM\HDD etc) not because it didn't have 100mbps.

5mbps is more than enough for any gaming server.
Naturn
Deeds, not words.
+311|7050|Greenwood, IN

Ender2309 wrote:

SAF.Phaxe wrote:

SAF had a 48 man BF2142 server, our was running great. Didn't get any lagg at all..
*TA* had a 48 man (i believe its 52 now) running 2142, never laggy at all, and we don't have a ping kick.
They still do have a 48 man and it lags all the fucking time but I still play anyways. 
majorassult
I <3 ak101
+307|7108|under there hayousaidunderwear

Brizzzer wrote:

Ender2309 wrote:

SAF.Phaxe wrote:

SAF had a 48 man BF2142 server, our was running great. Didn't get any lagg at all..
*TA* had a 48 man (i believe its 52 now) running 2142, never laggy at all, and we don't have a ping kick.
They still do have a 48 man and it lags all the fucking time but I still play anyways. 
Are you talking about ender's server?  If so, it doesn't lag at all, your settings are just up too high.
Buzerk1
Member
+44|7281

Avantek wrote:

Ninja_Monkey wrote:

he said 40+ ........
20+32=52
52>40
52 falls into the category of 40+...
He's talking about BF2142 and you are talking about BF2

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard