I am buying a new mid-range computer. Here are the basic specs:
evga 680i mobo
2gb ocz ddr2 900 pc2-7200
evga 8800gts
My question is concerning the processor. In benchmarks, the E6600 only performs about 10% better than the E6400, yet it costs about 50% more. Most people seem to suggest that the E6600 is worth it, but I dont understand why. I know it has more L2cache and a higher speed, but it still only translates to a ~10% increase.
What I dont understand is "bottlenecking" and overall performance. Even though the E6600 does not look that much better in benchmarks, will it work much better in practice because it will bottleneck less? Which processor should I get.
Thanks for your time.
evga 680i mobo
2gb ocz ddr2 900 pc2-7200
evga 8800gts
My question is concerning the processor. In benchmarks, the E6600 only performs about 10% better than the E6400, yet it costs about 50% more. Most people seem to suggest that the E6600 is worth it, but I dont understand why. I know it has more L2cache and a higher speed, but it still only translates to a ~10% increase.
What I dont understand is "bottlenecking" and overall performance. Even though the E6600 does not look that much better in benchmarks, will it work much better in practice because it will bottleneck less? Which processor should I get.
Thanks for your time.