thtthht
maximum bullshit
+50|6784|teh alien spaceshit
Ok... this question is for people who is a veteran or is currently in the marines, air force, army, or seals. I want to know what kind of damage each round posted below can do to a human with no body amour. Not only how many shots it takes to kill a man, but also what kind of damage it does to a body.

5.56x45:

5.56x39

6.8:

7.62x39: (for those of you who use ak)

7.62x51:

7.62x54:

.416

12.7x99:

12.7x108:

Thanks!
commandochristian
Honda - The Power of Dreams
+293|6866|Michigan, USA

  Got a grudge or something?

Last edited by commandochristian (2007-03-25 18:11:02)

thtthht
maximum bullshit
+50|6784|teh alien spaceshit

commandochristian wrote:

  Got a grudge or something?
no
m8v2
Banned
+16|6749

thtthht wrote:

commandochristian wrote:

  Got a grudge or something?
no
Then why would you need to know how many rounds it takes to kill a person?
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6899|The Land of Scott Walker

m8v2 wrote:

thtthht wrote:

commandochristian wrote:

  Got a grudge or something?
no
Then why would you need to know how many rounds it takes to kill a person?
Curiosity?  That'd be why I'd ask.
m8v2
Banned
+16|6749

Stingray24 wrote:

m8v2 wrote:

thtthht wrote:


no
Then why would you need to know how many rounds it takes to kill a person?
Curiosity?  That'd be why I'd ask.
It just seems a little odd. Hey does anyone know how much plutonium does it take to make a nuke?
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6862|Somersetshire

m8v2 wrote:

thtthht wrote:

commandochristian wrote:

  Got a grudge or something?
no
Then why would you need to know how many rounds it takes to kill a person?
all it takes is one nicely placed shot.......to the head!


or to the chest,a bullet can bounce around in the human body before exiting

(e.g. goes in shoulder, comes out hip, ripping though any organs it comes in contact with)
|CoR| Majik_Kracker
Anti-Tank Aficionado
+10|7154|Arizona, USA
Its better he's asking than trying it out.
AudioAtomica
Member
+53|6704

|CoR| Majik_Kracker wrote:

Its better he's asking than trying it out.
But expierence is so much more important than knowledge!
Entertayner
Member
+826|7024

thtthht wrote:

From: my friend's bathroom
+

thtthht wrote:

Ok... this question is for people who is a veteran or is currently in the marines, air force, army, or seals. I want to know what kind of damage each round posted below can do to a human with no body amour. Not only how many shots it takes to kill a man, but also what kind of damage it does to a body.

5.56x45:

5.56x39

6.8:

7.62x39: (for those of you who use ak)

7.62x51:

7.62x54:

.416

12.7x99:

12.7x108:

Thanks!
= THAT DUDE OUT OF SAW!!!
CoronadoSEAL
pics or it didn't happen
+207|6972|USA
*concerned*
cowami
OY, BITCHTITS!
+1,106|6743|Noo Yawk, Noo Yawk

Right. Well, all I know is that the 7.62 can actually cause death, while the 5.56 is designed for dropping the enemy. I think there was a post somewhere that said that the U.S. thought that using the 5.56 in 'Nam would take out 3 soldiers (1 gets shot, 2 move him away) as opposed to the 7.62, which would kill only 1.
https://i.imgur.com/PfIpcdn.gif
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7164|Sweden

thtthht wrote:

I want to know what kind of damage each round posted below can do to a human with no body amour. Not only how many shots it takes to kill a man, but also what kind of damage it does to a body.


Thanks!
You scare me how many shots does it takes to kill someone??? sounds like you´re talking about a game here..
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6821|Columbus, Ohio
Is it effect or affect?  I never know the correct time to use either of them.
cowami
OY, BITCHTITS!
+1,106|6743|Noo Yawk, Noo Yawk

usmarine2007 wrote:

Is it effect or affect?  I never know the correct time to use either of them.
Effect would be the right one. Effect is the noun, while affect is the verb.

For example:
The effect of the topic was to lead to a flamewar and a closing by Flaming Maniac.

As opposed to:
DonFck's victory in the User Battle affected polarbearz so much that he decided to leave. Again.

No chance I'm sucking up to any mods here.
https://i.imgur.com/PfIpcdn.gif
usmarine2007
Banned
+374|6821|Columbus, Ohio
Hmmm... thanks for the refresher.  Back on topic please.
Cougar
Banned
+1,962|7218|Dallas

thtthht wrote:

Ok... this question is for people who is a veteran or is currently in the marines, air force, army, or seals. I want to know what kind of damage each round posted below can do to a human with no body amour. Not only how many shots it takes to kill a man, but also what kind of damage it does to a body.

5.56x45:

5.56x39

6.8:

7.62x39: (for those of you who use ak)

7.62x51:

7.62x54:

.416

12.7x99:

12.7x108:

Thanks!
Well all in all, it doesn't matter what size the bullet is, it matters what type the bullet is and where it hits the body.  For instance, an FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round will hit the body and depending on whether or not it hits something hard (aka a bone) it may or may not come apart upon impact, in fact it may just go straight through.  A hollow-point bullet on the other hand is designed to mushroom upon impact causing the metal jacket to fragment away and the lead core to mushroom out and create more surface area as the bullet travels through the body, causing massive damage.  Some bullets, known as frangible ammunition, actually penetrate and then turn into dust to insure that they do not penetrate through the target and beyond. 

All the size of the bullet means is, how fast the bullet goes, how large the bullet is (thus how much surface area the bullet will occupy as it travels through the body), and what type of weapon the bullet is designed for.  For instance, 7.62X51 is just a variation of a .308 shell, whereas the 7.62X54 is what is used in assault rifles and some sniper rifles and a 7.62X25 is a pistol cartridge.

As far as how many shots it would take to kill someone, you could technically shoot someone in the foot 10 times with a 7.62 and they would live, but once in the head and they are taking a dirt nap.  Don't worry about bullet size, worry about bullet trajectory.

usmarine2007 wrote:

Is it effect or affect?  I never know the correct time to use either of them.
Effect.
11sog_raider
a gaurdian of life
+112|6912|behind my rifle
12.7x99:

12.7x108:
obviously... blow the shit out of you...but the medics from bf2 can revive you!
Crash727
Member
+12|7095|NH, USA
At least he is asking about conventional weapons and not chemical.  From the target's prespective: does it really matter?
soldevilla13
SuperFly
+21|7175|oregon

cowami wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Is it effect or affect?  I never know the correct time to use either of them.
Effect would be the right one. Effect is the noun, while affect is the verb.

For example:
The effect of the topic was to lead to a flamewar and a closing by Flaming Maniac.

As opposed to:
DonFck's victory in the User Battle affected polarbearz so much that he decided to leave. Again.

No chance I'm sucking up to any mods here.
you got it twisted buddy...other way around, thx a lot tho!

Oh, if this is wrong, then my whole eigth grade year was a lie. if this is wrong, my life has been tainted by a teacher who didn't know any grammar at all... Uh-Oh!

Last edited by soldevilla13 (2007-03-26 00:00:07)

-[Silver.Inc*
BF2s AU Server Admin
+315|7034|Melbourne, Australia.
Its not really the amount of bullets...I mean, I could fire 20 bullets at your fingers and toes and you'd be alive and kicking...thats in video games...in RL it mainly depends on where you hit them
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6848|The Gem Saloon
hydro-static shock is the name of the game.
cougar hit it right on the head pretty much.
the weight of the bullet combined with its velocity give it the inertia to do damage.
what hydro-static shock refers too is effect of a round entering the body AND THE SHOCK IT CAUSES...not the hole, not the bleeding, the shock of the bullet felt by the body.
alot of ammo can be lethal just from that....if you put a round right next to somones heart, its likely to shut down the heart from the energy.....you with me still?
good, so theoretically a larger bullet with more powder, like the 7.62 fired from this G3 here:
http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … era066.flv
will do more damage than the 9mm fired from this uzi:
http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … uzi009.flv
this IQ .45 that i use for my carry weapon is more powerful than the .38 my wife carries.
https://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/parkercustoms/uzi023.jpg
there are plenty of resources on the web besides a bunch of fools that play a video game....if i were you i would find my answers that way.
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6844

soldevilla13 wrote:

cowami wrote:

usmarine2007 wrote:

Is it effect or affect?  I never know the correct time to use either of them.
Effect would be the right one. Effect is the noun, while affect is the verb.

For example:
The effect of the topic was to lead to a flamewar and a closing by Flaming Maniac.

As opposed to:
DonFck's victory in the User Battle affected polarbearz so much that he decided to leave. Again.

No chance I'm sucking up to any mods here.
you got it twisted buddy...other way around, thx a lot tho!

Oh, if this is wrong, then my whole eigth grade year was a lie. if this is wrong, my life has been tainted by a teacher who didn't know any grammar at all... Uh-Oh!

Unfortunately, your teacher was lying.
Affect = verb
Effect = noun

Time to use the information above to injure your teacher without killing him/her.
MrE`158
Member
+103|7077

Parker wrote:

hydro-static shock is the name of the game.
cougar hit it right on the head pretty much.
the weight of the bullet combined with its velocity give it the inertia to do damage.
what hydro-static shock refers too is effect of a round entering the body AND THE SHOCK IT CAUSES...not the hole, not the bleeding, the shock of the bullet felt by the body.
alot of ammo can be lethal just from that....if you put a round right next to somones heart, its likely to shut down the heart from the energy.....you with me still?
good, so theoretically a larger bullet with more powder, like the 7.62 fired from this G3 here:
http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … era066.flv
will do more damage than the 9mm fired from this uzi:
http://s47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … uzi009.flv
this IQ .45 that i use for my carry weapon is more powerful than the .38 my wife carries.
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f180/ … uzi023.jpg
there are plenty of resources on the web besides a bunch of fools that play a video game....if i were you i would find my answers that way.
I'm still unconvinced by the "hydrostatic shock" arguement.  I've yet to read anything from a reputable medical source that backs it up.  The laws of physics tell me that the bullet cannot hit a body with any greater force than that which is imparted to the rifle on firing.  Now sure, the rifle butt  and recoil systems take a lot of the impact out of what the firer feels, but even still.  From what I've read, the human body is flexible enough that the only place where a shock-wave is likely to have significant effect is inside the skull, since that's a particularly inflexible part of the body.  But let's face it, if there's a bullet inside your skull you're in a lot of trouble already.

The biggest factors are those that Cougar mentioned (and I don't recall him mentioning hydrostatic shock):  the type of bullet and the way and place it hits a body.  Bullets do damage by tearing tissue as they pass through, for the most part.  This caused bleeding and physical damage to internal organs, which can lead to death.  Bullets which fragment can cause a lot more damage, since they spread through the body in different directions. 

Harder rounds (like a typical military rifle round) are more likely to pass straight through a body, the idea being to take the target out of action with a wound without causing undue suffering.  This is part of the international laws of war, you can't use rounds that are designed to fragment, because once a persons been shot he's a non-combatant (for the most part, anyway, there are of course exceptions), and anything beyond that constitutes causing uneccessary suffering.  Conversely, police often use softer rounds designed to mushroom (or sometimes even fragment) inside a target.  That's because their priority is protecting the civilians that might be near their target, and they can't risk a shot passing through the bad guy and hitting someone behind them.

Any bullet that hits someone can kill.  Small pistol rounds don't have a great velocity or mass, and are often stopped by bone, for example.  That means that shooting someone with a pistol might just crack a rib, or the shot could glance off their skull.  But, if that little bullet pass between two ribs and nicks a major artery, they'll bleed out in minutes and die, and there'll be fuck all you can do about it.  A small shot could open a major blood vessel in the leg, arm, chest, neck or it could pass into the skull.  Any of those is likely to be fatal.  Bigger bullets from more powerful cartridges, such as from a rifle have more mass and velocity, and as such are more likely to get inside, for example, the chest cavity and therefore cause damage to important organs like the heart, lungs and liver, any of which being torn or punctured will result in death very quickly.

The bigger rounds you mention at the bottom of the list are (relatively) huge big lumps of metal that travel very fast indeed.  For the most part, a human body isn't hard enough to stop a .50cal round, it'll just pass through causing a huge amount of damage on the way.  I've heard anecdotal accounts of .50's taking peoples limbs off, and a wound like that will kills someone very quickly from shock and blood loss. These are rounds designed to damage vehicles, pass through brick walls and the like.  Squishy human tissue isn't an issue for them.

Given the right circumstances, any bullet can kill, that's what they are designed to do, after all.

Last edited by MrE`158 (2007-03-26 08:28:25)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6983|Global Command
A shot to the bicep from any of the above rounds, left unttreated would result in death.
A shot to the bicep from a 308 would likely blow the arm right off.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard