mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7176|Sydney, Australia

leetkyle wrote:

No, not really. I won't accept entries that are like 700x400 for obvious reasons. There is no set size, but you know if you've overstepped the boundary.
This is a BF2s competition. Signature sizes are to be adhering to the BF2s Signature Rules!

Signatures: No nudity, total height of your sig(s) should be under 250px, and keep the total file size under 150 kilobytes.
Mcminty.
theDude5B
Cool member
+805|7205
Well, you HAD a good idea but you have just ruined it.

Would have been better to have people PM you the links for their Sig's so that no one knows who has designed the Sig's. Then when voting commences, it will be anonymous. NOW it is just going to be who loves who and childish brown nosers sucking up to the head honchos.
The Magic Mullet
Member
+240|6879
The popularity contests on this forum make me cringe.
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6845

theDude5B wrote:

Well, you HAD a good idea but you have just ruined it.

Would have been better to have people PM you the links for their Sig's so that no one knows who has designed the Sig's. Then when voting commences, it will be anonymous. NOW it is just going to be who loves who and childish brown nosers sucking up to the head honchos.
Well, it's not hard to see who designed ATG and McMinty.
danCer
teh m0nsta
+314|7170|Germany

Ty wrote:

I'll sit out of this one. I'm honestly kinda tired of these popularity contest poll things.

theDude5B wrote:

Well, you HAD a good idea but you have just ruined it.
hear hear²

It's a popularity contest, FFS!
Now it's all about who is entering that sig aagain and just another user battle.
Why don't you just accept the pms with the sig links?
Give one user as criteria and then let people decide which of the two freshly made sigs wins.
Otherwise people will just vote for the person.
scottomus0
Teh forum ghey!
+172|7091|Wigan. Manchester. England.
Im in laydd.

Pm'd you.
psH
Banned
+217|6838|Sydney
http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/9724/p … sigeo2.jpg

I dont think ill get far, but what the hey. BTW i dont have PS...using GIMP right now.
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7193|The Hague, Netherlands

some_random_panda wrote:

theDude5B wrote:

Well, you HAD a good idea but you have just ruined it.

Would have been better to have people PM you the links for their Sig's so that no one knows who has designed the Sig's. Then when voting commences, it will be anonymous. NOW it is just going to be who loves who and childish brown nosers sucking up to the head honchos.
Well, it's not hard to see who designed ATG and McMinty.
yes but thats why, it should be

- Make a new sig
- PM it to the person who makes it all (+ proof it's yours, PSD files or something)
- No creator names allowed on the sigs
- then it should be

Signature 1 vs Signature 2.

The Creators of the sigs will be given AFTER the finals

this way people vote for the signatures not for the person, example:

I know bennet isn't loved but if he makes a killer awesome sig and he's up against example Chuy who made not so good sig. who would people vote for ? for Chuy, because hes popular. so it's basicly another User Battle.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
Toilet Sex
one love, one pig
+1,775|7026

^*AlphA*^ wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

theDude5B wrote:

Well, you HAD a good idea but you have just ruined it.

Would have been better to have people PM you the links for their Sig's so that no one knows who has designed the Sig's. Then when voting commences, it will be anonymous. NOW it is just going to be who loves who and childish brown nosers sucking up to the head honchos.
Well, it's not hard to see who designed ATG and McMinty.
yes but thats why, it should be

- Make a new sig
- PM it to the person who makes it all (+ proof it's yours, PSD files or something)
- No creator names allowed on the sigs
- then it should be

Signature 1 vs Signature 2.

The Creators of the sigs will be given AFTER the finals

this way people vote for the signatures not for the person, example:

I know bennet isn't loved but if he makes a killer awesome sig and he's up against example Chuy who made not so good sig. who would people vote for ? for Chuy, because hes popular.
Agreed. If it's like that then I'll enter.
scottomus0
Teh forum ghey!
+172|7091|Wigan. Manchester. England.
Correcttttttttttt, Listen to alpha.
R3v4n
We shall beat to quarters!
+433|6941|Melbourne

10 4 AlphA Style
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7176|Sydney, Australia
OK... I'll just remove my username.
psH
Banned
+217|6838|Sydney
Well i think im gonna follow the Alpha crowd....
R3v4n
We shall beat to quarters!
+433|6941|Melbourne

mcminty wrote:

OK... I'll just remove my username.
Negative, you create a hole new sig.  that way people don't know who the creator is.
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
OmniDeath
~
+726|7098

new thread?
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7193|The Hague, Netherlands

well I can orginaze the whole thing,

+ seeding etc, FFlink's Board.  but thats up to you people + the guy who created this one if you let me.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
R3v4n
We shall beat to quarters!
+433|6941|Melbourne

Im all for it, having a mod running it would be better imo to.

Also, i think the thread should be made and closed for say 3 days so people have a chance to make a Good sig and results aren't accepted on the spot.

Last edited by R3v4n (2007-03-29 04:51:39)

~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|7147
I wont be able to host my best sig for two weeks. So unless you can put my in the last bracket, then I guess I have to sit this one out. If I am able to get in one of my Gmod sigs before I compete (if I do that is) then I will.

Last edited by Superior Mind (2007-03-29 05:03:21)

theDude5B
Cool member
+805|7205

scottomus0 wrote:

Correcttttttttttt, Listen to alpha.
Listen to Alpha! ?!?! That is just my idea which I stole from Dancer!!!


some_random_panda wrote:

Well, it's not hard to see who designed ATG and McMinty.
this may be true for some people, but I dont have my sigs displayed in the forum so I have to click on the image link to see someones sig, which means I have not got a clue who designs what around here. I recon there are other people like that and more newer members who might not recognise a sig but can still vote.

If this is to work, everything needs to be anonymous. no one apart from the creator, and who ever recieves the PM's can know who created the sig.

Last edited by theDude5B (2007-03-29 05:10:12)

^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7193|The Hague, Netherlands

theDude5B wrote:

scottomus0 wrote:

Correcttttttttttt, Listen to alpha.
Listen to Alpha! ?!?! That is just my idea which I stole from Dancer!!!
well I worked it out a bit more, + I didn't call people brown nosers

so whats it's gonna be ?

the way it's organized now or

the plan that I worked out a bit more (with help of others) then I will organize it as mod (closing, making thread, seeding, accepting PM's etc ?) or kyle's current one.

the plan I have is that (also with help of others)

- 3 Day Sig Making Thread
- will set up the rules in there, and then the sig makes will have 3 days (example, Fri/Sat/Sun) to make theirs
- Then, on Monday, I will accept 32 Signatures (Only with PSD included, no creator name on sigs allowed) via PM's
- Seeding begins
- Will make 1 vs 1 polls, 4 polls at a day, the polls will last 24 hours, winner goes to next round.
- Will last 4/5 days the whole thing (depends)
- Has to be a new sig, so nobody will immediately know it's from a particular someone
- Anyone who is in the battle and is somewhere bragging about that a particular sig is his and they should vote for him (if I find out) will be disqualified
- Creator's of the Sigs Are NOT allowed to say which sig is theirs, This Info Will Be Given After The Finals or (if the Creator Is Already Out Of The Battle)

(will add more)
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|7086|Finland

I agree with AlphA to 100%. It should be anonymous, so we can be sure that the sig is being voted for/against and not its maker.

Damn this post is short.. Alfie already said it all.
I need around tree fiddy.
Marlboroman82
Personal philosophy: Clothing optional.
+1,022|7078|Camp XRay

https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/jock.jpg

i win
https://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l250/marlboroman82/Untitled-8.png
Sarrk
O-O-O A-O A
+788|7110|Brisbane, Australia

^*AlphA*^ wrote:

theDude5B wrote:

scottomus0 wrote:

Correcttttttttttt, Listen to alpha.
Listen to Alpha! ?!?! That is just my idea which I stole from Dancer!!!
well I worked it out a bit more, + I didn't call people brown nosers

so whats it's gonna be ?

the way it's organized now or

the plan that I worked out a bit more (with help of others) then I will organize it as mod (closing, making thread, seeding, accepting PM's etc ?) or kyle's current one.

the plan I have is that (also with help of others)

- 3 Day Sig Making Thread
- will set up the rules in there, and then the sig makes will have 3 days (example, Fri/Sat/Sun) to make theirs
- Then, on Monday, I will accept 32 Signatures (Only with PSD included, no creator name on sigs allowed) via PM's
- Seeding begins
- Will make 1 vs 1 polls, 4 polls at a day, the polls will last 24 hours, winner goes to next round.
- Will last 4/5 days the whole thing (depends)
- Has to be a new sig, so nobody will immediately know it's from a particular someone
- Anyone who is in the battle and is somewhere bragging about that a particular sig is his and they should vote for him (if I find out) will be disqualified
- Creator's of the Sigs Are NOT allowed to say which sig is theirs, This Info Will Be Given After The Finals or (if the Creator Is Already Out Of The Battle)

(will add more)
It really doesnt matter, 5 bucks says I can pick 50% of the entrants.
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7193|The Hague, Netherlands

Sarrk wrote:

^*AlphA*^ wrote:

theDude5B wrote:

Listen to Alpha! ?!?! That is just my idea which I stole from Dancer!!!
well I worked it out a bit more, + I didn't call people brown nosers

so whats it's gonna be ?

the way it's organized now or

the plan that I worked out a bit more (with help of others) then I will organize it as mod (closing, making thread, seeding, accepting PM's etc ?) or kyle's current one.

the plan I have is that (also with help of others)

- 3 Day Sig Making Thread
- will set up the rules in there, and then the sig makes will have 3 days (example, Fri/Sat/Sun) to make theirs
- Then, on Monday, I will accept 32 Signatures (Only with PSD included, no creator name on sigs allowed) via PM's
- Seeding begins
- Will make 1 vs 1 polls, 4 polls at a day, the polls will last 24 hours, winner goes to next round.
- Will last 4/5 days the whole thing (depends)
- Has to be a new sig, so nobody will immediately know it's from a particular someone
- Anyone who is in the battle and is somewhere bragging about that a particular sig is his and they should vote for him (if I find out) will be disqualified
- Creator's of the Sigs Are NOT allowed to say which sig is theirs, This Info Will Be Given After The Finals or (if the Creator Is Already Out Of The Battle)

(will add more)
It really doesnt matter, 5 bucks says I can pick 50% of the entrants.
might be...

at least a bit better then it is now.

but if all of you wanna do it this way(the way it is), then go ahead
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
OmniDeath
~
+726|7098

well, im in if we do it alf's way

edit: how do we send files through pm? i know how to link an image and all, but a psd. file?

Last edited by Omnideath (2007-03-29 06:20:19)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard