I already have.lowing wrote:
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
Menachem Begin. There are many more, but he is a shining example.
I already have.lowing wrote:
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbethlowing wrote:
Ummmmmmmm what about the SAS, what about the Iraq veterans who are against the war??FlamingDeath wrote:
the SAS, not for enjoyment, but for pro british rulers in foriegn lands
but more recently, the US in Iraq, go look at the iraqs veterans against the war
go read about the history of the place that we live in
Are you saying these groups Sole mission was to go out, find women and children and kill them???
I have read our history, I am asking you to back up your comments with some examples. Do not expect me to do it for you.
Now, once again..............Name people that targeted women and children for death, that have the label as freedom fighter.
By the way since you tell me to educate myself on our history let me shed some light as how I feel about our history.
I can not and will not defend American action during the Indian Wars, I can not and will defend American treatment against minorities pre-civil-rights movement.
Our history is full of hypocrasy I admit that. The one thing about America that I will defend is this:
Our country everyday tries to right the wrongs of our past, we own up to them and we fix them.
Even our own history books do not call Custer a "freedom fighter".
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-04-08 16:27:34)
Utter BS most of what that guy says.FlamingDeath wrote:
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
Last edited by Jet Blast (2007-04-08 16:27:30)
/winGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
dumbass.
Holy shit people are still buying that..lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbethlowing wrote:
Ummmmmmmm what about the SAS, what about the Iraq veterans who are against the war??
Are you saying these groups Sole mission was to go out, find women and children and kill them???
I have read our history, I am asking you to back up your comments with some examples. Do not expect me to do it for you.
Now, once again..............Name people that targeted women and children for death, that have the label as freedom fighter.
By the way since you tell me to educate myself on our history let me shed some light as how I feel about our history.
I can not and will not defend American action during the Indian Wars, I can not and will defend American treatment against minorities pre-civil-rights movement.
Our history is full of hypocrasy I admit that. The one thing about America that I will defend is this:
Our country everyday tries to right the wrongs of our past, we own up to them and we fix them.
Even our own history books do not call Custer a "freedom fighter".
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
dumbass.
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-04-08 16:31:03)
So if its on CNN, its fact? riiiiighhht lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbethlowing wrote:
Ummmmmmmm what about the SAS, what about the Iraq veterans who are against the war??
Are you saying these groups Sole mission was to go out, find women and children and kill them???
I have read our history, I am asking you to back up your comments with some examples. Do not expect me to do it for you.
Now, once again..............Name people that targeted women and children for death, that have the label as freedom fighter.
By the way since you tell me to educate myself on our history let me shed some light as how I feel about our history.
I can not and will not defend American action during the Indian Wars, I can not and will defend American treatment against minorities pre-civil-rights movement.
Our history is full of hypocrasy I admit that. The one thing about America that I will defend is this:
Our country everyday tries to right the wrongs of our past, we own up to them and we fix them.
Even our own history books do not call Custer a "freedom fighter".
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
dumbass.
Wow...just wow.FlamingDeath wrote:
So if its on CNN, its fact? riiiiighhht lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbeth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
dumbass.
He even says in that interview, his story has been oppressed by the mainstream media, before that wiki was devised. but anyhow, of course the military officials will deny it. like a murderer isnt going to admit murder when there is no evidence. ur talking about the DOD here, not some mickey mouse establishment. maybe they have a late night paper shredding evening, not difficult
Here ya go aceFlamingDeath wrote:
So if its on CNN, its fact? riiiiighhht lolGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
this is what im talking about, you monkeys are so quick to believe the first thing you see just to back up your preformed opinions.FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbeth
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth
dumbass.
He even says in that interview, his story has been oppressed by the mainstream media, before that wiki was devised. but anyhow, of course the military officials will deny it. like a murderer isnt going to admit murder when there is no evidence. ur talking about the DOD here, not some mickey mouse establishment. maybe they have a late night paper shredding evening, not difficult
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lolJet Blast wrote:
Utter BS most of what that guy says.FlamingDeath wrote:
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
"Do whatever you want you won't get charged" Ya right.
HE LIED YOU FUCKING SHEEP.
Get it thru your head dude, he was not ever a Ranger.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lolJet Blast wrote:
Utter BS most of what that guy says.FlamingDeath wrote:
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
"Do whatever you want you won't get charged" Ya right.
HE LIED YOU FUCKING SHEEP.
try using both sides of ur brain for once
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more. next.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lolJet Blast wrote:
Utter BS most of what that guy says.FlamingDeath wrote:
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
"Do whatever you want you won't get charged" Ya right.
HE LIED YOU FUCKING SHEEP.
try using both sides of ur brain for once
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-04-08 16:41:02)
You didn't roll your cammies up like a Marine and take a fake picture?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more.
Last edited by Jet Blast (2007-04-08 16:41:38)
Or put your beret to the wrong side?Jet Blast wrote:
You didn't roll your cammies up like a Marine and take a fake picture?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more.
Last edited by Kmarion (2007-04-08 16:43:35)
Anybody with google can find out, and im not even american.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more. next.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lolJet Blast wrote:
Utter BS most of what that guy says.
"Do whatever you want you won't get charged" Ya right.
HE LIED YOU FUCKING SHEEP.
try using both sides of ur brain for once
Last edited by FlamingDeath (2007-04-08 16:44:50)
See if you can google how to properly wear the uniform why you are at it. That bonehead should have at least done that first.FlamingDeath wrote:
Anybody with google can find out, and im not even american.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more. next.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lol
try using both sides of ur brain for once
http://www.members.aol.com/forvets/dd214.htm
i think that confirms that they can be lost or destroyed. how is just another argument
but thanks, im sure the info of knowing what a dd-214 is, will help me in the future
lol...you heard him though right? Sounds like the cream of the crop.Kmarion wrote:
See if you can google how to properly wear the uniform why you are at it. That bonehead should have at least done that first.
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?Kmarion wrote:
See if you can google how to properly wear the uniform why you are at it. That bonehead should have at least done that first.FlamingDeath wrote:
Anybody with google can find out, and im not even american.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
and your talking to people who know what a dd-214 is. i was deployed longer than that fucker was in the army. i feel silly even addressing this any more. next.
http://www.members.aol.com/forvets/dd214.htm
i think that confirms that they can be lost or destroyed. how is just another argument
but thanks, im sure the info of knowing what a dd-214 is, will help me in the future
Even if he hadn't lied and it was all true (which it isn't), how is that relevant to terrorists being seen as freedom fighters?FlamingDeath wrote:
I'm an individual u fvcking sheeple lolJet Blast wrote:
Utter BS most of what that guy says.FlamingDeath wrote:
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
"Do whatever you want you won't get charged" Ya right.
HE LIED YOU FUCKING SHEEP.
try using both sides of ur brain for once
Because those school children are most likely actual school children.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?
Last edited by Jet Blast (2007-04-08 16:51:21)
Hmmmmm, ok I am still waiting for a plan! If power grids, communications, water treatment schools etc. is stuff they can see!! It goes well beyond what they hear..Bertster7 wrote:
How is what I've suggested terrorist appeasement? It is improving the quality of life for potential terrorists, true, but this is how you make people like you - you give them stuff. Not meaningless stuff that benefits the government, actual stuff that will please people. That's just one side though, there also has to be a concerted effort to track down and eliminate all those who glamourise terrorism or incite hatred in the way so many do today, but that should all be done very quietly and denied. You need your propaganda to be the only propaganda they hear.lowing wrote:
To all of you,
Good posts but it has been asked and asked again. I am all for a different approach to this problem. I defy anyone to give me the alternative plan laid out by the liberal leaders or any anti-Bush bone-head as to what that plan is.
Remember it is supposed to be a plan to defeat terrorism. NOT a plan to appease terrorism
You say we need to create a better life for prospective terrorists so they will not resort to such acts. WHat exactly do you think building schools roads, hospitals, power grids, communications grids etc....... is supposed to doing? What do you think helping a govt. that is not supposed to be oppressive take root in Iraq supposed to do?
SO once and for all, short of appeasement, retreat, surrender negotiate. WHAT is the liberal plan for winning the war on terrorism???
So basically, all smiles and niceness on the outside, whilst silencing all opposition ruthlessly - it works for African dictators. It's not the nicest or most noble way to tackle the problem, but I reckon it's work better than the current debacle.
lol.. is anyone else laughing as hard as I am? Comparing highly trained special force units to school children.. Ya think the photographer might have given him a hand?...lolFlamingDeath wrote:
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?Kmarion wrote:
See if you can google how to properly wear the uniform why you are at it. That bonehead should have at least done that first.FlamingDeath wrote:
Anybody with google can find out, and im not even american.
http://www.members.aol.com/forvets/dd214.htm
i think that confirms that they can be lost or destroyed. how is just another argument
but thanks, im sure the info of knowing what a dd-214 is, will help me in the future
I told you to use both sides of your brain, you totally missed the analogy, you do know what analogy means?Jet Blast wrote:
Because those school children are most likely actual school children.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?
Last edited by FlamingDeath (2007-04-08 16:54:36)
And you missed........ahh never mind.FlamingDeath wrote:
I told you to use both sides of your brain, you totally missed the analogy, you do know what analogy means?Jet Blast wrote:
Because those school children are most likely actual school children.FlamingDeath wrote:
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?
its a comparison, like a relation
LMAO......you mean THIS Jesse MAcBeth??!!!!FlamingDeath wrote:
Jess Macbethlowing wrote:
Ummmmmmmm what about the SAS, what about the Iraq veterans who are against the war??FlamingDeath wrote:
the SAS, not for enjoyment, but for pro british rulers in foriegn lands
but more recently, the US in Iraq, go look at the iraqs veterans against the war
go read about the history of the place that we live in
Are you saying these groups Sole mission was to go out, find women and children and kill them???
I have read our history, I am asking you to back up your comments with some examples. Do not expect me to do it for you.
Now, once again..............Name people that targeted women and children for death, that have the label as freedom fighter.
By the way since you tell me to educate myself on our history let me shed some light as how I feel about our history.
I can not and will not defend American action during the Indian Wars, I can not and will defend American treatment against minorities pre-civil-rights movement.
Our history is full of hypocrasy I admit that. The one thing about America that I will defend is this:
Our country everyday tries to right the wrongs of our past, we own up to them and we fix them.
Even our own history books do not call Custer a "freedom fighter".
So having said all of this...............................START NAMING!!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid … 2549547050
Operation Iraqi freedom actually meant Operation Iraqi slaughter
again... the crucial point is missed. i will explain again in simple terms. special forces are not school children, correct, well done, u get a gold star.Kmarion wrote:
lol.. is anyone else laughing as hard as I am? Comparing highly trained special force units to school children.. Ya think the photographer might have given him a hand?...lolFlamingDeath wrote:
I'll put the analogy across that school children don't always wear their uniforms correctly, so im not sure I understand your point?Kmarion wrote:
See if you can google how to properly wear the uniform why you are at it. That bonehead should have at least done that first.
m mm mm maybe?