yeh pwned
Yeah, didn't see those results coming.
/Sarcasm
/Sarcasm
And that's why single-barrel machineguns are traditionally fired in short aimed bursts. Far more accurate than minigun spray-and-pray.
Although nowhere near as fun.
Although nowhere near as fun.
You can't compare those two because the rate of fire is different. For the amount of times the minigun hit, it probably missed just as much, same for the 240. So if the 240 fired 130 rounds and missed 118 times, then the minigun probably fired 600 rounds and missed 450+ times. I believe the minigun has a 6000 rpm rate of fire? And the 240 has close to a 1000. 6-1 ratio, similar to my comparison earlier.
Time to get out a .50 with a red-dot scope or something similar on top.
didnt expect much from a GPMG
haha dillon aero just wants to sell their stuff...obviously they're gonna compare their product (minigun) with something that has no chance against it (M240) http://dillonaero.com/
3000-6000, they mostly use the 3000 setting to conserve ammo.nonexistentusmc wrote:
You can't compare those two because the rate of fire is different. For the amount of times the minigun hit, it probably missed just as much, same for the 240. So if the 240 fired 130 rounds and missed 118 times, then the minigun probably fired 600 rounds and missed 450+ times. I believe the minigun has a 6000 rpm rate of fire? And the 240 has close to a 1000. 6-1 ratio, similar to my comparison earlier.
Of course, if you put it up against a gau-8 avenger, it would make the m134 look rather silly.tahadar wrote:
haha dillon aero just wants to sell their stuff...obviously they're gonna compare their product (minigun) with something that has no chance against it (M240) http://dillonaero.com/
..and why exactly aren't these guns mounted on jets?
Russian jets tend to use Autocannons that fire really fast.SargeV1.4 wrote:
..and why exactly aren't these guns mounted on jets?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mig-29#Specifications
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gryazev-Shipunov_GSh-30-1
U.S jets tend to use Gatling guns - so they are mounted on jets.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-16#Speci … lock_30.29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M61_Vulcan
It's just that BF2 makes them seem like they fire slow. In real life you literally have like seconds of ammo. Especially for the MiG-29, i mean 150 rounds from an autocannon that fires 1,500RPM won't last long at all.
they are, the M61A1 Vulcan 6 barrel 20mm cannon is mounted on most US aircraft, then on the others its the Gau-12/U 25mm 6 barrel cannon. then on the A-10 its the Gau-8 Avenger 30mm 7 barrel cannon. 6 direct hits from an Avenger cannon penetrates a tanks armor.SargeV1.4 wrote:
..and why exactly aren't these guns mounted on jets?
The Gau-12 is mounted on the Av-8 Harrier in a 6 barrel configuration and also mounted on the F-35 in a 4 barrel config. the M61A1 is mounted on F-15s, F-16s, F-14s and the F-22.
Last edited by seymorebutts443 (2007-04-07 08:00:53)
So basically when they nerfed the blackhawks in game, they took away the 134s and gave us 240s....
Pretty much, M240s that hit nothing.Canin wrote:
So basically when they nerfed the blackhawks in game, they took away the 134s and gave us 240s....