haha - Besides Israel, Ireland has the greatest influence in America than any other nation on the planet including Britian, and that's according to the former British ambassador to the US, talking rubbish as usual dribble, at least 30 million + of your fellow Americans would notice, how many american tears would be shed on Britain vanishing though?
freeeeeedooooooommmmmmm
Science bless you sir (I'm Atheist)!Major_Spittle wrote:
The Brits are the strongest group of people on the planet. Look at what they did when they formed America, they made a super-naturally strong colony that not even they could control. These aren't your ordinary girly boy Europeans we are talking about. What have the Scottish and Irish done, yep they have ran around in dresses being cannon fodder. This is their history, never been a great empire, just cannon fodder. I can respect the Germans, they were misguided and all but that tiny ass country took on the world 2 times and about kicked its arse. The Japanesse are that way too. France, Spain, and Rome had their days in the sun, but somehow lost their appetite for greatness and decided to become the world cry-asses/wellfare countries for the past 3 centuries. Russia tried for greatness, but as soon as they used up the German scientists and couldn't steal any more technology from other countries they became the same old "proud, but don't know why" country they have always been. Asia and Africa are too disorganised to be great, they could use a lesson from Japan. The Middle east is just a bunch of camel jockey tribes more interested in killing their neighbor and beating their wives than inventing something or being great. Once the oil is gone they will crawl back under their rocks. Israel is great, but too small. Maybe if they had a real country that wasn't in the ghetto of the world. They are like a smart, white, middle class family that moved into the projects on the south side of Chicago. Autraila could be great, but it would ruin them. Them and Canada just seem to have found their nitche in being perpetual "I don't care" type party countries. South America and Mexico doesn't even warrent commenting on, would anyone miss these countries if they disappeared? I wouldn't even notice, not so unlike if Scottland and Ireland disappeared.
I hope this clears it up for you.
Last edited by =OBS= EstebanRey (2007-04-28 15:32:34)
I doubt many Americans have even heard of Ireland, other than the fact that "they came from their"... either way i dont give a shit, i would rather Scotland stayed part of the UK, because i think the UK is a great thing, but if they do leave we are even more in the money.IG-Calibre wrote:
haha - Besides Israel, Ireland has the greatest influence in America than any other nation on the planet including Britian, and that's according to the former British ambassador to the US, talking rubbish as usual dribble, at least 30 million + of your fellow Americans would notice, how many american tears would be shed on Britain vanishing though?
Scotland should be independent, that way Americans don't have to wrap their heads around the concept of Great Britain VS the UK.
If they left you could change your flag again, and maybe this time encorperate the wales dragon.Vilham wrote:
I doubt many Americans have even heard of Ireland, other than the fact that "they came from their"... either way i dont give a shit, i would rather Scotland stayed part of the UK, because i think the UK is a great thing, but if they do leave we are even more in the money.IG-Calibre wrote:
haha - Besides Israel, Ireland has the greatest influence in America than any other nation on the planet including Britian, and that's according to the former British ambassador to the US, talking rubbish as usual dribble, at least 30 million + of your fellow Americans would notice, how many american tears would be shed on Britain vanishing though?
Scotland is fine as a part of the UK. If they separated, they'd just end up discriminating against each other, and sterilizing the European ( and a bit American as well) economy.
Scotts are brits, dum-dum. They were brits long before the 13 colonies. Hell, they even ruled over britain at times. Scotts are closer to Bretons than Normans anyway.Major_Spittle wrote:
The Brits are the strongest group of people on the planet. Look at what they did when they formed America, they made a super-naturally strong colony that not even they could control. These aren't your ordinary girly boy Europeans we are talking about. What have the Scottish and Irish done, yep they have ran around in dresses being cannon fodder. This is their history, never been a great empire, just cannon fodder. I can respect the Germans, they were misguided and all but that tiny ass country took on the world 2 times and about kicked its arse. The Japanesse are that way too. France, Spain, and Rome had their days in the sun, but somehow lost their appetite for greatness and decided to become the world cry-asses/wellfare countries for the past 3 centuries. Russia tried for greatness, but as soon as they used up the German scientists and couldn't steal any more technology from other countries they became the same old "proud, but don't know why" country they have always been. Asia and Africa are too disorganised to be great, they could use a lesson from Japan. The Middle east is just a bunch of camel jockey tribes more interested in killing their neighbor and beating their wives than inventing something or being great. Once the oil is gone they will crawl back under their rocks. Israel is great, but too small. Maybe if they had a real country that wasn't in the ghetto of the world. They are like a smart, white, middle class family that moved into the projects on the south side of Chicago. Autraila could be great, but it would ruin them. Them and Canada just seem to have found their nitche in being perpetual "I don't care" type party countries. South America and Mexico doesn't even warrent commenting on, would anyone miss these countries if they disappeared? I wouldn't even notice, not so unlike if Scottland and Ireland disappeared.
I hope this clears it up for you.
Actually, Britian's best contributers in their army were the Scots. While the English sat on their asses counting their tea bags, the Scots were in the colonies, they were in the army, they settled around the world. They invented technology that forms our world, they contributed to the economic philosophy that is one of the most sucessful in the world, and they continued their Scots charge (albeit in a more disciplined order and setting) that confounded French, Russian, and German alike.
The Scots aren't dumb as a generalization, they're merely ambitious.
As for the Irish, well here's something on them: "God made beer to save the world from the Irish"
The Scots aren't dumb as a generalization, they're merely ambitious.
As for the Irish, well here's something on them: "God made beer to save the world from the Irish"
Nice sig Cam, where is your little poster about how many INNOCENT people the Islamic radicals have killed..........and you really really have no idea as to why I think your view points prop up terrorism, or why I think you celebrate coalition setbacks??CameronPoe wrote:
Hooray for Scotland. About time they got their act together. If they had an ounce of national pride their beautiful country would be every bit as affluent as the Republic by now.
Is joking banned in the US now ?lowing wrote:
Nice sig Cam, where is your little poster about how many INNOCENT people the Islamic radicals have killed..........and you really really have no idea as to why I think your view points prop up terrorism, or why I think you celebrate coalition setbacks??CameronPoe wrote:
Hooray for Scotland. About time they got their act together. If they had an ounce of national pride their beautiful country would be every bit as affluent as the Republic by now.
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
QFEVaregg wrote:
Is joking banned in the US now ?
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I saidCameronPoe wrote:
QFEVaregg wrote:
Is joking banned in the US now ?
I guess you don't get the irony of it then.lowing wrote:
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I saidCameronPoe wrote:
QFEVaregg wrote:
Is joking banned in the US now ?
Generalizing ftw !!!lowing wrote:
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I saidCameronPoe wrote:
QFEVaregg wrote:
Is joking banned in the US now ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Yes, yes, the ole' "generalizing" defense I notice more and more this being used as a shield apparently do the lack of any sort of real defense.Varegg wrote:
Generalizing ftw !!!lowing wrote:
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I saidCameronPoe wrote:
QFE
yeah, I guess so.Bertster7 wrote:
I guess you don't get the irony of it then.lowing wrote:
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I saidCameronPoe wrote:
QFE
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?lowing wrote:
Yes, yes, the ole' "generalizing" defense I notice more and more this being used as a shield apparently do the lack of any sort of real defense.Varegg wrote:
Generalizing ftw !!!lowing wrote:
Ohhhh so the year and a half that I have read Cams posts on this issue was only a joke?? He really does support the war effort against terrorism and thinks his beloved Islamic radicals are a threat to the free world?? I am sorry, I guess I missed the "j/k" note on all of those posts. I take back what I said
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??Varegg wrote:
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?lowing wrote:
Yes, yes, the ole' "generalizing" defense I notice more and more this being used as a shield apparently do the lack of any sort of real defense.Varegg wrote:
Generalizing ftw !!!
That's why it's funny. It's ironic.lowing wrote:
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??Varegg wrote:
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?lowing wrote:
Yes, yes, the ole' "generalizing" defense I notice more and more this being used as a shield apparently do the lack of any sort of real defense.
The sig, for your information, is a joke and it is taken from the website www.t-shirthell.com which specialises in deliberately controversial, sick, funny and/or politically incorrect t-shirts. It's based in America.lowing wrote:
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??Varegg wrote:
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?lowing wrote:
Yes, yes, the ole' "generalizing" defense I notice more and more this being used as a shield apparently do the lack of any sort of real defense.
Here's another of their shirts, for example:
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-04-29 07:23:53)
ya might wanna look up the word "irony". His sig goes right along with his posts since I have been reading him.Bertster7 wrote:
That's why it's funny. It's ironic.lowing wrote:
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??Varegg wrote:
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?
sure if your sig not re-inforce everything you have ever spouted off about these issues I would take it as a joke. but since it doesn't.............................CameronPoe wrote:
The sig, for your information, is a joke and it is taken from the website www.t-shirthell.com which specialises in deliberately controversial, sick, funny and/or politically incorrect t-shirts. It's based in America.lowing wrote:
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??Varegg wrote:
So since he is Cameron Poe, he is not allowed to have a funny sig joking with his own views ?
Here's another of their shirts, for example:
http://www.tshirthell.com/shirts/produc … 902_bm.gif
It's kind of a tasteless truthful joke if you will.lowing wrote:
sure if your sig not re-inforce everything you have ever spouted off about these issues I would take it as a joke. but since it doesn't.............................
No it doesn't.lowing wrote:
ya might wanna look up the word "irony". His sig goes right along with his posts since I have been reading him.Bertster7 wrote:
That's why it's funny. It's ironic.lowing wrote:
Of course he is allowed to joke, however, I guess there must be a difference of opinion as to whether or not his sig is meant as a joke. I am using a year and a half of his past posts to suggest he isn't. How 'bout you??
From a literal perspective it seems to be commending Bush's slaughter of Arabs. Which is obviously quite contrary to Cameron's views on the topic.
I'd call that irony.
You seem to be taking his sig very personally.