BF2S Forums 2007: Nuclear Attack and Invasion of United States

Superior Mind wrote:

To Scorpion0x17. The UK defiantly isn't an innocent little virgin. How the fuck dare you hope that America's people are massacred by the millions. If you said that to my face I would probably beaten the shit out of you until your face resembled a pool of bloody stool.

fuck ya, give em hell superior.
with an attitude like that, you dont need to worry about any invasions. bring your ass to stl, ill put you to work.

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

A good proportion of the Irish population don't like us. And they're right not to.

So, I'll ask again, should a mother love her serial-killer son regardless of the evil in him?

Please explain how we are "serial killers?"

You probably know the list of wars the US initiated better than I.

I know of one war that we didn't start but if it weren't for our involvement you'd be speaking German right now.

Villain{NY} wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Please explain how we are "serial killers?"

You probably know the list of wars the US initiated better than I.

I know of one war that we didn't start but if it weren't for our involvement you'd be speaking German right now.

Wrong. The US made the war shorter, but the germans were never going to win. They were starving their population so as to build ever more tanks. They would have run out of people before they'd have defeated us.

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

OK, now I'm starting to hope the OP is true...

maybe it'll spark the US into orgy of self-destruction...

I know what you wrote...

Wishing the 'US' - that is the entity that is the country we call the United States Of America - would self-destruct is not the same as hoping that "America's people are massacred by the millions".

Please learn to comprehend English before entering the Debate and Serious Talk section.

Well, according to the OP's post, the one that you wish were to come true, for the entity that is the USA to self-destruct, millions of Americans would have to die.

And to that I take great offense, because chances are, myself and my family would probably be some of the first to die if in fact this prediction were to come to.

Last edited by Superior Mind (2007-05-10 21:01:19)

Superior Mind wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

I know what you wrote...

Wishing the 'US' - that is the entity that is the country we call the United States Of America - would self-destruct is not the same as hoping that "America's people are massacred by the millions".

Please learn to comprehend English before entering the Debate and Serious Talk section.

Well, according to the OP's post, the one that you wish were to come true, for the entity that is the USA to self-destruct, millions of Americans would have to die.

Again, please learn to comprehend English before entering Debate and Serious Talk. The OPs post does not say that. The OP says that the US has been infiltrated by hordes to terrorists. If that is true, it would not require the death of millions of americans for the US to self-destruct.

Superior Mind wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

Well, according to the OP's post, the one that you wish were to come true, for the entity that is the USA to self-destruct, millions of Americans would have to die.

Again, please learn to comprehend English before entering Debate and Serious Talk. The OPs post does not say that. The OP says that the US has been infiltrated by hordes to terrorists. If that is true, it would not require the death of millions of americans for the US to self-destruct.

FFS, what do you think these hordes of terrorists would do? Ask us to quietly leave?

Hello, my name is Akbar Abdullah Mohammed Baruk. I am terrorist. You american. Leave America to the Canada or Mexico. Pretty please with, how you say, the sugar on the tops?

But consider all of this, following a nuclear attack and by nuclear attack I mean a scenario in which smaller nukes  have been amassed in major/strategic cities over the course of the past 10 years and set off by individuals on the ground. Imagine that most people would be considering their own/families survival (food, water, sanitation, shelter, looters, etc).

Then say a week later masses come up over the border of Mexico in conjunction with whatever factions are supposedly in this country to begin the 'slaughter'. How quickly and in what numbers would citizens be able to organize? How would they even know to organize for the cause of an invasion? Our own National Guard, if truly stretched thin at the time, would be inundated with Civil matters.

What then?

Last edited by jsnipy (2007-05-10 21:13:43)

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Parker wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Wishing the 'US' - that is the entity that is the country we call the United States Of America - would self-destruct is not the same as hoping that "America's people are massacred by the millions".

Please learn to comprehend English before entering the Debate and Serious Talk section.

seeing as how most americans would die for their country (not sure how it is across the pond), you pretty much said what you didnt intend to.


oh and that one about the nazis wouldnt have beat england...LOL, the battle of britain was won *SLIGHTLY*....they were across the channel and you couldnt have done what we did...plain and simple. thats why operation overlord wasnt an english operation.

And no, the £119 billion ($235,717,072,273.27) loan from the US in money and supplies didn't help at all..

It helped to make the war shorter. The outcome would have been the same, in the end, without US support - it just would have taken longer and would have cost far more lives.

jsnipy wrote:

But consider all of this, following a nuclear attack and by nuclear attack I mean a scenario in which smaller nukes  have been amassed in major/strategic cities over the course of the past 10 years and set off by individuals on the ground. Imagine that most people would be considering their own/families survival (food, water, sanitation, shelter, looters, etc).

Then say a week later masses come up over the border of Mexico in conjunction with whatever factions are supposedly in this country to begin the 'slaughter'. How quickly and in what numbers would citizens be able to organize? How would they even know to organize for the cause of an invasion? Our own National Guard, if truly stretched thin at the time, would be inundated with Civil matters.

What then?

In that specific scenario, the US is fucked anyway.

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

In that specific scenario, the US is fucked anyway.

I smell a "Mother of all battles" speech.

jsnipy wrote:

But consider all of this, following a nuclear attack and by nuclear attack I mean a scenario in which smaller nukes  have been amassed in major/strategic cities over the course of the past 10 years and set off by individuals on the ground. Imagine that most people would be considering their own/families survival (food, water, sanitation, shelter, looters, etc).

Then say a week later masses come up over the border of Mexico in conjunction with whatever factions are supposedly in this country to begin the 'slaughter'. How quickly and in what numbers would citizens be able to organize? How would they even know to organize for the cause of an invasion? Our own National Guard, if truly stretched thin at the time, would be inundated with Civil matters.

What then?

thats a pretty good point, and im sure there would be some places that would be completely useless. in order to take down americas infrastructure completely a massive amount of weapons would be needed. ALL communications would need to be knocked out, in the entire country.....thats a pretty demanding task. even after EVERY power station is knocked out people still have radios and batteries.
i think there would be mass chaos at first, with looting, and probably martial law being put into effect until things calmed down. once an "invasion" took place and word got out, all hell would break loose. anyone with a pickup truck, a few friends and some rifles would become an asset. imagine the best way to defend your neighborhood......now imagine an army having to go through that a million times over before they even got to where you are.


it will never happen, our civilians are too powerful.

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

Well, I, personally didn't. But, yeah, I know.

Should a mother love her serial-killer son regardless of the evil in him?

lol.  I can't even respond to that.  Too busy laughing.

Should the Irish like you?  Since you forced so many into starvation which forced a lot of them to come to the US.

A good proportion of the Irish population don't like us. And they're right not to.

So, I'll ask again, should a mother love her serial-killer son regardless of the evil in him?

If you really think that way, then you know very little about history.  Either that, or you are so obsessed with disliking America, that you are not paying attention to any of the good things America has done for the world.  And then there is the most likely possibility, and that is you are jealous.

I think the US would be in chaos for a while but would eventually restore order, ableit at great cost.  I suspect any countries caught interfering would be nuked (or at least threatened with nuking) in short order.

TBH, killing swathes of civilians doesn't seem like venezuela's style, its certainly no way to endear yourself to the population you're trying to control.