CNN Is RETARDED

2007-05-11 13:57:36

#1

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnn … _58889.asp

How could you ever possibly take these people serious ever again?

This is one illustration of the blatant stupidity of the media and their unrelentless assault on the Bush admin and anybody associated with them.
So what they are saying is Tony Blair was not even his own man, he was a Bush shill and that his resignation is the formal distancing of England from the U.S. in the middle East.

News, editorial, or editorial disguised as news?

And, can any one ever cite an example of the blatant stupidity of Fox news in a similiar manner?

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/CNN_c … _0101.html

LOL, idiots.

2007-05-11 14:03:02

#2

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|7077|Washington, DC

I think you're reading too much into that...

2007-05-11 14:03:48

#3

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6936|Gogledd Cymru

Hurricane wrote:
I think you're reading too much into that...

UNLEASH THE GRAPE

2007-05-11 14:05:45

#4

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|7096

Hurricane wrote:
I think you're reading too much into that...

Same. That, or it's a disgruntled employee having a joke.

2007-05-11 14:05:51

#5

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6915

CNN, FOX, CBS, they all mix editorials into news and they all suck.

It is hard to find a good news source these days

2007-05-11 14:06:14

#6

Dr_3V|L: Member; +51|7172|Twente, The Netherlands

Come on, the people at CNN are not robots. Humans make mistakes.

2007-05-11 14:06:42

#7

{M5}Sniper3: Typical white person.; +389|7207|San Antonio, Texas

The media so bias anyways... They probably made that "mistake" on purpose.

Last edited by {M5}Sniper3 (2007-05-11 14:09:03)

2007-05-11 14:10:01

#8

crimson_grunt: Shitty Disposition (apparently); +214|7101|Teesside, UK

wtf? Either the people who types the captions are idiots or their attempts at subliminal messaging are appalling.

2007-05-11 14:15:56

#9

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7213|Cambridge (UK)

ATG wrote:
How could you ever possibly take these people serious ever again?

How could you ever take them seriously in the first place?

2007-05-11 14:18:59

#10

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,993|7079|949

It was a mistake. I doubt there was any type of bad intent. I would put it in the same category as them posting obituaries of old people that aren't dead yet.

http://www.snopes.com/humor/mediagoofs/cnnobits.asp

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-05-11 14:19:44)

2007-05-11 14:20:41

#11

topal63: . . .; +533|7165

I was hoping it was true!

2007-05-11 14:25:20

#12

Sanjaya: Banned; +40|6674

nvm

Last edited by Sanjaya (2007-05-11 14:25:31)

2007-05-11 14:28:59

#13

Belx: Member; +4|7125|New York, New York

This was probably just a mistake, not everything is "liberal bias."

2007-05-11 14:40:55

#14

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6976|Global Command

crimson_grunt wrote:
wtf? Either the people who types the captions are idiots or their attempts at subliminal messaging are appalling.

QFE

2007-05-11 14:45:01

#15

topal63: . . .; +533|7165

ATG wrote:
And, can any one ever cite an example of the blatant stupidity of Fox news in a similiar manner?
LOL, idiots.

I think so, give me a minute to find FOX's blatant blunders (LOL, idiots).

FOX news, reports Republican Mark Foley is a Democrat:

OK, this one was not an error, but as a label it is blatant FOX stupidity:

Last edited by topal63 (2007-05-11 15:07:11)

2007-05-11 15:04:52

#16

paranoid101: Ambitious but Rubbish; +540|7187

Maybe it was just wishful thinking.

2007-05-11 15:17:12

#17

The_Mac: Member; +96|6672

Dr_3V|L wrote:
Come on, the people at CNN are not robots.

Not the way you think, apparently.

2007-05-11 15:20:23

#18

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7209

topal63 wrote:
ATG wrote:
And, can any one ever cite an example of the blatant stupidity of Fox news in a similiar manner?
LOL, idiots.
I think so, give me a minute to find FOX's blatant blunders (LOL, idiots).

FOX news, reports Republican Mark Foley is a Democrat:
http://i9.tinypic.com/644aow0.jpg
http://i9.tinypic.com/4msis0g.jpg

OK, this one was not an error, but as a label it is blatant FOX stupidity:
http://i9.tinypic.com/52m2ayp.jpg

How do we know these pictures are legit?

2007-05-11 15:21:55

#19

topal63: . . .; +533|7165

usmarine2005 wrote:
topal63 wrote:
ATG wrote:
And, can any one ever cite an example of the blatant stupidity of Fox news in a similiar manner?
LOL, idiots.
I think so, give me a minute to find FOX's blatant blunders (LOL, idiots).

FOX news, reports Republican Mark Foley is a Democrat:
http://i9.tinypic.com/644aow0.jpg
http://i9.tinypic.com/4msis0g.jpg

OK, this one was not an error, but as a label it is blatant FOX stupidity:
http://i9.tinypic.com/52m2ayp.jpg
How do we know these pictures are legit?

Why don't you just assume they are not, and then find out for yourself they are.

Last edited by topal63 (2007-05-11 15:22:42)

2007-05-11 15:23:21

#20

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7209

topal63 wrote:
Why don't you just assume they are not, and then find out for yourself they are.

Are you on the rag? My bad. Sorry to disturb you.

2007-05-11 15:26:18

#21

topal63: . . .; +533|7165

usmarine2005 wrote:
topal63 wrote:
Why don't you just assume they are not, and then find out for yourself they are.
Are you on the rag? My bad. Sorry to disturb you.

I was being serious. Google it if you think it's photoshopped or made-up. Why take my word for it? I wouldn't. I am sure you'll find numerous sources - and/or news stories.

Last edited by topal63 (2007-05-11 15:28:16)

2007-05-11 15:27:46

#22

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7209

topal63 wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
topal63 wrote:
Why don't you just assume they are not, and then find out for yourself they are.
Are you on the rag? My bad. Sorry to disturb you.
I was being serious... Google it if you think its photoshopped, or made-up... why take my word for it? I wouldn't. I am sure you'll find numerous sources - and/or news stories.

Well, I withdraw my last statement, that was stupid.

However, you can see the hatred people have for FOX for some reason, so you can understand my doubts.

2007-05-11 15:29:59

#23

topal63: . . .; +533|7165

usmarine2005 wrote:
topal63 wrote:
usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you on the rag? My bad. Sorry to disturb you.
I was being serious... Google it if you think its photoshopped, or made-up... why take my word for it? I wouldn't. I am sure you'll find numerous sources - and/or news stories.
Well, I withdraw my last statement, that was stupid.

However, you can see the hatred people have for FOX for some reason, so you can understand my doubts.

In my opinion, comparing CNN to FOX, is not really an apples/oranges comparison.

In many ways it's a type of apple/apple comparison.

P.S. You have to admit "100 Hours to turn America into San Francisco" is funny, even if inappropriate for a News Network.

Last edited by topal63 (2007-05-11 15:34:08)

2007-05-11 15:33:39

#24

Rickard.Jarl-: Member; +7|6666|Sweden, Norrbotten, Luleå.

FOX sucks biiig time, im more into BBC

2007-05-11 15:34:21

#25

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7209

Rickard.Jarl- wrote:
FOX sucks biiig time, im more into BBC

Oh ya...BBC is great. lawl

BF2S Forums CNN Is RETARDED

Hurricane wrote:

Hurricane wrote:

ATG wrote:

crimson_grunt wrote:

ATG wrote:

Dr_3V|L wrote:

topal63 wrote:

ATG wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

ATG wrote:

topal63 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

topal63 wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

Rickard.Jarl- wrote:

Board footer