Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6995|San Diego, CA, USA
"Paris, May 07: France`s President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy says he wants to put France back to work, using the five-year mandate he secured today to spur economic growth through tax cuts and market-based reforms.

The right-wing former Interior Minister, who defeated socialist rival Segolene Royal, has vowed to confront head-on France`s dubious distinction of being "the European country that works the least".

In the face of existing legislation restricting the working week to 35 hours, Sarkozy wants to give workers a chance "to work more to earn more."

Without scrapping the 35-hour week, he would allow employers to boost overtime pay by 25 percent, with the extra hours exempt from taxes and social charges.

The goal would be to strengthen consumer purchasing power, galvanize economic momentum and thereby slash France`s 8.3 percent jobless rate, among the highest in the Eurozone."

Source: http://www.spcm.org/Journal/spip.php?article10549


What a great idea.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7209

35 Hours?  WTF?  Jesus Christ.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6894|Chicago, IL
35 hours........lazy bastards.  Sarkozy needs to get rid of that law all together
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6995|San Diego, CA, USA
Yeah I know...I work 35 hours a week just driving to/from work.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6894|Chicago, IL
Seriously, Ive pulled 35 hour weeks working part time, the French need to get over themselves and get to work.
T.Pike
99 Problems . . .
+187|6729|Pennsyltucky

I play BF2 for 35 hours a week.
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|7157|Sweden
I would love those changes here right now i tax around 50% of my salary i earn when i work overtime. < not a very good motivation.
RicardoBlanco
The English
+177|7015|Oxford
What's wrong with a 35 hour week? Ever heard of quality over quantity?
Not
Great success!
+216|7024|Chandler, AZ

RicardoBlanco wrote:

What's wrong with a 35 hour week? Ever heard of quality over quantity?
Ever heard of France?
Jepeto87
Member
+38|7132|Dublin
Id love a 35 hour week... That is all...
JG1567JG
Member
+110|7035|United States of America
I work 36 hrs. one week w,th,f and 48 hrs. the next week m,tu,sa,su.  12hrs a day.  I could be forced into 4 hrs overtime (16 hr day) if my coworker doesn't show up.  Can only be forced into overtime once every 72 hrs.

I don't see how this new overtime law in France would help the unemployment there, but it would be nice to keep more of your money. Here in the U.S. some of taxes that I pay is matched by my employer.  Now if this is true in france and the employers are allowed to not pay this tax also then I would think this could even harm the employment rate.
I would think that a 35 hour work week would end up putting more people to work.

Last edited by JG1567JG (2007-05-12 06:05:35)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6942

Harmor wrote:

What a great idea.
I hope youre sarcastic, because increasing incentives for workers to work longer hours will only worsen Frances unemployment problems.
Lost Hope
Lurker
+20|6774|Brussels, Belgium

Harmor wrote:

The goal would be to strengthen consumer purchasing power, galvanize economic momentum and thereby slash France`s 8.3 percent jobless rate, among the highest in the Eurozone."
Actually, the unemployment rate of France is higher than 8.3, it should be about 10 or nearly.

The government as put a lot of people out of the unemployment agency and don't count all the unemployed people.

I wouldn't be surprised if the government of Sarkozy does the same thing...
https://bf3s.com/sigs/9c9f8f6ff3579a4c711aa54bbb9e928ec0786003.png
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina

Harmor wrote:

"Paris, May 07: France`s President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy says he wants to put France back to work, using the five-year mandate he secured today to spur economic growth through tax cuts and market-based reforms.

The right-wing former Interior Minister, who defeated socialist rival Segolene Royal, has vowed to confront head-on France`s dubious distinction of being "the European country that works the least".

In the face of existing legislation restricting the working week to 35 hours, Sarkozy wants to give workers a chance "to work more to earn more."

Without scrapping the 35-hour week, he would allow employers to boost overtime pay by 25 percent, with the extra hours exempt from taxes and social charges.

The goal would be to strengthen consumer purchasing power, galvanize economic momentum and thereby slash France`s 8.3 percent jobless rate, among the highest in the Eurozone."

Source: http://www.spcm.org/Journal/spip.php?article10549

What a great idea.
Awesome.  Sarkozy rocks... 

Last edited by Turquoise (2007-05-12 07:20:11)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina

usmarine2005 wrote:

35 Hours?  WTF?  Jesus Christ.
If I'm not mistaken, Germany considers 32 hours as full time.

Many European nations have shorter work weeks, because it allows more people to be employed, but I think these kinds of policies are a bit outdated.  Moving towards a 40 hour week is probably for the best.
Zodiaccup
Member
+42|6993

Turquoise wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

35 Hours?  WTF?  Jesus Christ.
If I'm not mistaken, Germany considers 32 hours as full time.
You are wrong, 38.5 hours are the minimum fulltime in Germany.
jonsimon
Member
+224|6942

Turquoise wrote:

Harmor wrote:

"Paris, May 07: France`s President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy says he wants to put France back to work, using the five-year mandate he secured today to spur economic growth through tax cuts and market-based reforms.

The right-wing former Interior Minister, who defeated socialist rival Segolene Royal, has vowed to confront head-on France`s dubious distinction of being "the European country that works the least".

In the face of existing legislation restricting the working week to 35 hours, Sarkozy wants to give workers a chance "to work more to earn more."

Without scrapping the 35-hour week, he would allow employers to boost overtime pay by 25 percent, with the extra hours exempt from taxes and social charges.

The goal would be to strengthen consumer purchasing power, galvanize economic momentum and thereby slash France`s 8.3 percent jobless rate, among the highest in the Eurozone."

Source: http://www.spcm.org/Journal/spip.php?article10549

What a great idea.
Awesome.  Sarkozy rocks... 
Turqoise... He is promoting unemployment, a problem France currently has that he pleged to remedy. And according to the BBC, he is planning to pay for his policies by cutting civic services, in other words, he will be firing people to create jobs. France is screwed.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7209

RicardoBlanco wrote:

What's wrong with a 35 hour week? Ever heard of quality over quantity?
lol........ ok.  I work about 50 hours a week, and my quantity and quality are just fine.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina

Zodiaccup wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

35 Hours?  WTF?  Jesus Christ.
If I'm not mistaken, Germany considers 32 hours as full time.
You are wrong, 38.5 hours are the minimum fulltime in Germany.
Oh thanks for the info...  +1 
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina

jonsimon wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Harmor wrote:

"Paris, May 07: France`s President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy says he wants to put France back to work, using the five-year mandate he secured today to spur economic growth through tax cuts and market-based reforms.

The right-wing former Interior Minister, who defeated socialist rival Segolene Royal, has vowed to confront head-on France`s dubious distinction of being "the European country that works the least".

In the face of existing legislation restricting the working week to 35 hours, Sarkozy wants to give workers a chance "to work more to earn more."

Without scrapping the 35-hour week, he would allow employers to boost overtime pay by 25 percent, with the extra hours exempt from taxes and social charges.

The goal would be to strengthen consumer purchasing power, galvanize economic momentum and thereby slash France`s 8.3 percent jobless rate, among the highest in the Eurozone."

Source: http://www.spcm.org/Journal/spip.php?article10549

What a great idea.
Awesome.  Sarkozy rocks... 
Turqoise... He is promoting unemployment, a problem France currently has that he pleged to remedy. And according to the BBC, he is planning to pay for his policies by cutting civic services, in other words, he will be firing people to create jobs. France is screwed.
Well, here's the thing...  Isn't it true that, by decreasing taxation on overtime, he'll be allowing more people to keep more of their pay, and that, collectively, this could allow more people to consume more.  If consumption goes up, then there might be an increase in jobs.

I guess I figure that increasing disposable income on a collective level should allow more people to invest or spend their money in the economy, and in general, this should increase overall production (and jobs).

Does increased investment not usually equal more jobs?...

Last edited by Turquoise (2007-05-12 07:34:45)

jonsimon
Member
+224|6942

Turquoise wrote:

Well, here's the thing...  Isn't it true that, by decreasing taxation on overtime, he'll be allowing more people to keep more of their pay, and that, collectively, this could allow more people to consume more.  If consumption goes up, then there might be an increase in jobs.

I guess I figure that increasing disposable income on a collective level should allow more people to invest or spend their money in the economy, and in general, this should increase overall production (and jobs).

Does increased investment not usually equal more jobs?...
Does it matter? By increasing incentives for workers to take overtime hours and for employers to allow them he increases the productivity of each employee. By doing so he reduces the incentives of the employer to hire another worker. Direct relationships are more important than loose indirect ones. This policy change is a direct disincentive for employers to purchase more labor, while hopes that increasing consumption will, through market forces, create a need for more jobs is not only an indirect approach, but much less reliable. Honestly, these politicians keep arguing that they can control the market through indirect means, but the honest truth is no one is well enough informed to control something with this level of complexity. Any gains in employment through this policy will have to contend with the immediate decrease in incentives for employers to purchase labor.

As a little hypothetical, lets say there is an office building that houses the administrative services of a large corporation. Say there are small menial tasks, such as filing, that are not getting done because the current workforce is not large enough to handle them in a 35 hour work week. Say, with the new incentives for overtime, every worker takes a 36 hour work week to complete their unfinished tasks. Managment sees that they dont need the 3 white collar filing positions they were interviewing for to complete the unfinished work. 3 more Frenchmen remain unemployed.

Last edited by jonsimon (2007-05-12 07:49:57)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6852|North Carolina

jonsimon wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Well, here's the thing...  Isn't it true that, by decreasing taxation on overtime, he'll be allowing more people to keep more of their pay, and that, collectively, this could allow more people to consume more.  If consumption goes up, then there might be an increase in jobs.

I guess I figure that increasing disposable income on a collective level should allow more people to invest or spend their money in the economy, and in general, this should increase overall production (and jobs).

Does increased investment not usually equal more jobs?...
Does it matter? By increasing incentives for workers to take overtime hours and for employers to allow them he increases the productivity of each employee. By doing so he reduces the incentives of the employer to hire another worker. Direct relationships are more important than loose indirect ones. This policy change is a direct disincentive for employers to purchase more labor, while hopes that increasing consumption will, through market forces, create a need for more jobs is not only an indirect approach, but much less reliable. Honestly, these politicians keep arguing that they can control the market through indirect means, but the honest truth is no one is well enough informed to control something with this level of complexity. Any gains in employment through this policy will have to contend with the immediate decrease in incentives for employers to purchase labor.
Good points, but I sincerely believe that Sarkozy and others like him are needed for Europe to move forward economically.  France is too socialized.

By the same token, we need more socialization here.  There seems to be a happy medium between the socialism of Europe and the privatization of America that Canada is currently enjoying.  I know some people are going to laugh at this statement, but we should probably aspire to be more like Canada in terms of certain economic principles.

To strengthen my point, look at how both the Liberals and the Conservatives in Canada have maintained many consecutive years of a budget surplus.  We should take notes on their fiscal responsibility.
xRBLx
I've got lovely bunch of coconuts!!
+27|6802|England - Kent
35 hours a week??? part timers!
The EU wants to cut England down to a max of 48 hours a week
i used to do 12 hours a day 6 days a week. oh how i miss the money :S
EVieira
Member
+105|6925|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Turquoise wrote:

jonsimon wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Well, here's the thing...  Isn't it true that, by decreasing taxation on overtime, he'll be allowing more people to keep more of their pay, and that, collectively, this could allow more people to consume more.  If consumption goes up, then there might be an increase in jobs.

I guess I figure that increasing disposable income on a collective level should allow more people to invest or spend their money in the economy, and in general, this should increase overall production (and jobs).

Does increased investment not usually equal more jobs?...
Does it matter? By increasing incentives for workers to take overtime hours and for employers to allow them he increases the productivity of each employee. By doing so he reduces the incentives of the employer to hire another worker. Direct relationships are more important than loose indirect ones. This policy change is a direct disincentive for employers to purchase more labor, while hopes that increasing consumption will, through market forces, create a need for more jobs is not only an indirect approach, but much less reliable. Honestly, these politicians keep arguing that they can control the market through indirect means, but the honest truth is no one is well enough informed to control something with this level of complexity. Any gains in employment through this policy will have to contend with the immediate decrease in incentives for employers to purchase labor.
Good points, but I sincerely believe that Sarkozy and others like him are needed for Europe to move forward economically.  France is too socialized.
Good points indeed. But Sarkozy is doing something pretty brave for a politician. He is trying to reduce unemployment by cutting taxes and making the government more efficient, two things that if done right can give a great boost to French economy. But these are long term goals, most politicians try to reduce unemployment by shortening the work week and increasing government spending, usually through increase in taxes too. Those options are great for headlines and short-term solutions, and have been used several times in France. Look where it got them on the long run.

France is too socialized, like Turquoise already said. How is France's economy going to grow with a heavily taxed 35-hour work-week? This guy is looking ahead, we must give him some time. If he can pull this off, France could really take off.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
Ottomania
Troll has returned.
+62|6968|Istanbul-Turkey

Harmor wrote:

Yeah I know...I work 35 hours a week just driving to/from work.
truck or bus driver?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard