If it were never winter in Russia, Germany would have beaten Russia within a few months of Operation Barbarossa's beginning. Germany was at the very gates of Moscow before the ill-prepared soldiers began falling due to the harsh wintercyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Russia VS Germany in WW2, who won? China might win I think, but they got no navy.Roger Lesboules wrote:
IMO United States would win in term of technologie...but china...they have a fucking bunch of soldier round here...
article 5 of the NATO charter states an attack on one of us is an attack on us all.usmarine2005 wrote:
How do you know who would aid England? What if Russia just declared war on England? Then went from there.iamangry wrote:
And how are you gonna get your ships through the American- armed European navies? I think even the air attack is dubious considering the radar systems we've also given the British. I think that an attack on Britain by sea would be suicide, for while the Brits have a smaller navy, the Brits have a better equipped navy. Better missiles, better sensors. That's what a naval battle is all about these days. Then you add in the spanish navy, who could reinforce the Brits in about 3 days. I really don't see an attack on Britain as possible without having the mainland. I do see an attack on the Scandinavian peninsula as viable way to establish your "stronghold".usmarine2005 wrote:
Amphib attack to try and secure a stronghold, and then air drops.
Stole that from Normandy.
I see your point. But if you do not take England, you will not take Europe.