Ryan
Member
+1,230|7289|Alberta, Canada

There is a song called 'Anatomy of you Enemy' by a band called 'Anti-Flag'.
Here are their lyrics (i'm just picking out the steps):

First step: Create the enemy. Sometimes this will be done for you.

Second step: Be sure the enemy you have chosen is nothing like you.

Third step: Once these differences are established, continue to reinforce them with all disseminated information.

Fourth step: Have the media broadcast only the ruling party's information. This can be done through state run media. Remember, in times of conflict, all for-profit media repeats the ruling party's information. Therefore all for-profit media becomes state-run.

Fifth step: Show this enemy in actions that seem strange, militant, or different. Always portray the enemy as non-human, evil, a killing machine.

Sixth step: Eliminate opposition to the ruling party. Create an "Us versus Them" mentality. Leave no room for opinions in between. One that does not support all actions of the ruling party should be considered a traitor.

Seventh step: Use nationalistic and/or religious symbols and rhetoric to define all actions. This can be achieved by slogans such as "freedom loving people versus those who hate freedom." This can also be achieved by the use of flags.

Eighth step: Align all actions with the dominant deity. It is very effective to use terms like, "It is god's will" or "god bless our nation."

Ninth step: Design propaganda to show that your soldiers have feelings, hopes, families, and loved ones. Make it clear that your soldiers are doing a duty; they do not want or like to kill.

Tenth step: Create and atmosphere of fear, and instability and then offer the ruling party as the only solutions to comfort the public's fears. Remembering the fear of the unknown is always the strongest fear.

We are not countries. We are not nations. We are not religions. We are not gods. We are not weapons. We are not ammunition. We are not killers. We will not be tools.

True? False? What are your thoughts?
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6975|Global Command
Or there is the American way and just do it...

Last edited by ATG (2007-06-06 17:36:49)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6851|North Carolina
...because we're arrogant enough to think we're the world's savior...
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6975|Global Command
...and because the public is too stupid, fat and lazy to do much about it...
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800
or just be savagely attacked. that works better .
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6851|North Carolina

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

or just be savagely attacked. that works better .
It works great for the military industrial complex.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|7007
Yes, because historically the nations who start the most wars are the least likely generate enmity......................?
specops10-4
Member
+108|7189|In the hills
There is something I hate about this thread.
Alliednations
Member
+0|6686|Illinois, United States
i believe in the 'cause i can' rule for making wars and enemies. 'sir, why did you invade iraq?' 'cause i can' 'sir, why did you bomb everyone on earth except u and me?' 'cause i can'...thanks to my friend for creating that rule...
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6851|North Carolina

Alliednations wrote:

i believe in the 'cause i can' rule for making wars and enemies. 'sir, why did you invade iraq?' 'cause i can' 'sir, why did you bomb everyone on earth except u and me?' 'cause i can'...thanks to my friend for creating that rule...
You'll go quite far in this government with that mindset.
acEofspadEs6313
Shiny! Let's be bad guys.
+102|7139|NAS Jacksonville, Florida

Turquoise wrote:

Alliednations wrote:

i believe in the 'cause i can' rule for making wars and enemies. 'sir, why did you invade iraq?' 'cause i can' 'sir, why did you bomb everyone on earth except u and me?' 'cause i can'...thanks to my friend for creating that rule...
You'll go quite far in this government with that mindset.
All the way to to top, perhaps.
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7152
I was sure that you were talking about the democratic party in America until I read step 7.

Last edited by Deadmonkiefart (2007-06-07 18:46:38)

Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

I thought that you were talking about the democratic party in America until I read step 7.
No, when attacked, masturbate !  is their motto.

Last edited by Hunter/Jumper (2007-06-06 18:38:44)

XanKrieger
iLurk
+60|7104|South West England

ATG wrote:

Or there is the American way and just do it...
THat had me lmao literaly
Ruckel
Ruckel for all!
+43|6621|sverige
i love it
geNius
..!.,
+144|6888|SoCal

Turquoise wrote:

...because we're arrogant enough to think we're the world's savior...
Because we have to be.
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png
Hunter/Jumper
Member
+117|6800
look at the uproar when we didn't personally save Dafur. I guess Sweden, Norway, Ireland Russia, China and Australia were already tied up else where.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|7111|NT, like Mick Dundee

geNius wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

...because we're arrogant enough to think we're the world's savior...
Because we have to be.
Mmm. Just gets everybody ticked off when the United States of America only save things that involve it's economic interests... Then act like they were doing it for the good of mankind...



Oh and the hypocrisy... Everybody hates that.


H/J, Australia doesn't have the logistical means or manpower to deal with Dafur.



Our military forces have about 50,000 people in them. Total. Something like 2,500 are in Iraq. I think we still have 500 in Afghanistan. As far as the rest go, another few thousand are involved in UN operations, many are involved in local civic projects (most Australians are unaware of this...), patrolling Australian waters ect.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7016|Portland, OR, USA

Hunter/Jumper wrote:

or just be savagely attacked. that works better .
Yeah like that whole gulf of Tonkin incident.. those little boats savagely attacked our destroyers... we surly had to go in there and imperialize the hell out of em.

I think the better way to start a war, is to either:

A) [joking]attack yourself and blame it on radical Muslims[/joking] (puts on flame proof suit and points to the joking code)

or

B) Realize that you are going to be attacked, but instead of stopping it, let it happen so you can get really pissed off and "justify" war..

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard