BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7214
After the recent Republican presidential debate, CNN executives evidently manipulated internal political polls, made it difficult for the public to find information on the real 'winner'--small-government conservative Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex), according to widespread Internet results." Here's the evidence:

"- GOP candidates were seated so that the 'first tier' candidates had center stage.

"- Second tier candidates received, in some cases, only half as much time as first tier candidates.

"- CNN moderators stated continuously that 'all' would have a chance to answer every question, but then ran out of time before these promises could be kept.

"- After the debate, behavior that seemed to marginalize certain candidates--especially Ron Paul--was just as obvious.

"- CNN anchors spent a good deal of time interviewing 'major' candidates, but far less time with increasingly popular 'second tier' candidates. The fervent support of some second-tier candidates on the 'Net--especially free-market proponent Ron Paul--is a major news story, but one that CNN virtually ignored.

"-CNN put up a 'visual' after the debate but then promptly pulled it. At the time it was pulled, it apparently showed candidate Ron Paul (R-Tex) winning the debate by a significant majority.

"-Later, CNN put up a web-based comments page about the debate but took that down, as well. The 'vanished' comment page has been posted at several alternative news websites. It features numerous positive comments about Ron Paul's performance.

"-CNN has also seemingly made it fairly difficult to find its web-based GOP Poll on the debate's winner. Once again, Ron Paul is firmly entrenched as the leader, and in several other Internet polls as well."


http://rense.com/general76/dksd.htm
Cerpin_Taxt
Member
+155|6649
Giuliani is worse than Bush, and what's scary is that he has a damn good chance of winning.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7120|Canberra, AUS

Cerpin_Taxt wrote:

Giuliani is worse than Bush, and what's scary is that he has a damn good chance of winning.
That's because he was in the right job, in the right place at the right time - Mayor of NYC after 9/11. That's the only reason.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Bags30
Member
+0|6968
Guliani is a pud. He is as bad as any liberal. He says he believes abortion is bad but supports it politically. If he cant even stand up for what he says are his principals, he should not lead the US.

And I agree. It is scary that he has a good chance of winning because most voters will not spend time researching candidates, they just vote for whoever the TV tells them to within their party.

And dont start debating abortion, I don't care about your position. My point is Principle Centered Leadership.


Duncan Hunter '08
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7047|132 and Bush

Isn't http://rense.com/ the same site that said the US was invading Iran 3 months ago?
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=68837
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rense.com
Anyways..

Paul's strategy is getting pretty obvious now. His staff claims he is "discriminated by everyone in the media". Are you aware CNN is liberal dominated network? Whats funny is if you visit ANY conservative sites NONE of them even have Paul placing. Even in this very forum we have seen mostly non conservatives composing topics that seem to imply "Poor Ron Paul" is actually winning. I sincerely hope no true conservatives are seriously buying into this shit.

I don't even want to hear about "any network bias" considering the Dems were too pansy to go on Fox for their debate. How can they be tough on terrorism when Shepard Smith scares them?

CNN did they very same thing with the Dems (So says the Dems).
From the Washington Post: "Although all eight Democratic candidates participated, debate sponsors deliberately put Clinton, Obama and Edwards next to each other, and they took much of the limelight."  I put more credit in the WAPO rather than a talk show host that devotes a good portion of his show to UFO's and conspiracy theories..

https://i17.tinypic.com/5x5zokw.png

Can I make a topic "CNN and Obama's Henchman"?
Obama, Clinton, and Edwards are the Dems top tiers.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7026|the dank(super) side of Oregon
republicans are so desparate, they probably will let rudy win the primary.  you know, he has fistfights with terrorists.
BN
smells like wee wee
+159|7214

Kmarion wrote:

Isn't http://rense.com/ the same site that said the US was invading Iran 3 months ago?
I was hesitant to post from rense but I thought what the hell
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7047|132 and Bush

BN wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Isn't http://rense.com/ the same site that said the US was invading Iran 3 months ago?
I was hesitant to post from rense but I thought what the hell
lol.. don't hesitate. I won't just debate the source. It's much more fun to go after the content .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
iamangry
Member
+59|7091|The United States of America
Why don't the good guys ever have henchmen?  I want a henchman.

I think the reason Ron Paul is "winning" these debates is because he's not a republican, hes a libertarian.  The polls taken are not of just republicans (what really matters at this stage) but of anybody called.  Most democrats are gonna vote for the republican candidate thats the least republican as the "winner" of the debate.
Commie Killer
Member
+192|6833

rdx-fx wrote:

meh.. forget the henchmen, i want minions.  scores and scores of undead zombie vampire brain-eating minions!

oh, wait.. nevermind.. that's the voters these presidential wanna-be's spend so much time courting - the braindead zombie fast-food-eating minions.
Nevermind - I take it back. I don't want all those minions - that'd mean I was President.

Damn..
Driver's License - You have to pass a test
College Degree - You have to pass a ton of tests
Any professional certification - You have to pass a test
Employment - You have to pass a (drug/backround) test
U.S. Citizenship - You have to pass a test
Credit Card - You have to pass a credit check

Voting for President of the United States - You have to have a pulse, and not drool too badly on the ballot (Okay, the 'pulse' is optional in Chicago).
Don't have to drive there, don't have to be employable, don't have to have any education, can show up drunk as a skunk and higher than Sputnik.. and you can still vote.  Don't even have to know enough about the candidate to be able to spell their name - just 'drool in the appropriate box' or pull the little lever that says 'All DummyCats' or 'All RapePublicans'

Y'know what - it'd make more sense (and we might have a chance of electing the right government) if everyone had to take the U.S. Citizenship test before they were 'qualified' to vote.  Because I know it'd be too much to ask to require people to know anything about the candidates .. hell, having to actually read something more than the 5th grade level USA Today every four years?! omg... soo hard.... the vowels, they burnssss...

</RANT>
Sad part is that its 100% true.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard