How do you know what patch you have.
I think i just downloaded 1.41 but i am not sure.
please reply if you can help me out
I think i just downloaded 1.41 but i am not sure.
please reply if you can help me out
when you are on your bfhq page on the top right corner it tells you what version you have
dont listen to him hes telling the truth!....... *cough*RECONDO67 wrote:
when you are on your bfhq page on the top right corner it tells you what version you have
You could just download the latest patch and install it. That would make sure it was the latest version with no problems.
omg, common sense. A rare giftHavok wrote:
You could just download the latest patch and install it. That would make sure it was the latest version with no problems.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
1.41 IS THE LATEST. Simply look at the filename of the patch. BF2_Patch_1.41.exe is pretty obvious, isn't it? Unless you've named your file to Random_536MB_file.exe...
And going to COMMUNITY -> CUSTOM GAMES and look at the BF2 row, it sais what version you have.
And going to COMMUNITY -> CUSTOM GAMES and look at the BF2 row, it sais what version you have.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2007-06-16 17:02:55)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
- globefish23
- sophisticated slacker
- +334|6589|Graz, Austria
What? Are you not using such a filenaming scheme?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Unless you've named your file to Random_536MB_file.exe...
I use it everywhere possible, since almost no two files have the exact same filesize, you can easily recognize them.