Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-06-20 05:59:00)
Pages: 1
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-06-20 05:59:00)
Last edited by cyborg_ninja-117 (2007-06-20 06:10:14)
Just because you have a limited vocabulary doesn't mean it's lame. The English language is so large that the average speaker only ever uses a portion of the total words.too_money2007 wrote:
When I think of intimidation and bullying, I don't say buffalo. lame.
Not funny.Ryan wrote:
Confused. All I gathered was that perhaps a buffalo is a homo...phone.
It may be technically be a sentence, but it has no meaning. There is no point in it as no-one could possibly understand it, so it is not a real sentenceCameronPoe wrote:
Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.
Acutally, our vocabularies are unlimited to a point. I would never say buffalo in this instance. It's stupid and sounds out of place.chittydog wrote:
Just because you have a limited vocabulary doesn't mean it's lame. The English language is so large that the average speaker only ever uses a portion of the total words.too_money2007 wrote:
When I think of intimidation and bullying, I don't say buffalo. lame.
Lol, exactly what I was thinking.Vilham wrote:
SOLDIER! In the heart of America!
The most reassuring part of the English language is that if slang or false meanings are used enough, it will eventually BECOME an accepted word. They actually add nonsense into the dictionary, simply because people are too stupid to learn the correct way.chittydog wrote:
Just because you have a limited vocabulary doesn't mean it's lame. The English language is so large that the average speaker only ever uses a portion of the total words.too_money2007 wrote:
When I think of intimidation and bullying, I don't say buffalo. lame.
Pages: 1