this site or that site?Undetected_Killer wrote:
Probably not a good idea to say that.
So, yeah, this site is bullshit and brings me shame.
Good thing I don't really give two damns. If I go to heaven, great. If I go to hell, I'll make it more fun than blackhawk whoring on 1.02.
Amen to that.Hurricane wrote:
Good thing I don't really give two damns. If I go to heaven, great. If I go to hell, I'll make it more fun than blackhawk whoring on 1.02.
QFTTy wrote:
AH HA HA HA HA HAAA!!
HA HA HA HAA!
HA HA HAA!
Ahh yes. 'Lol' just doesn't say it. How pathetic. Entertaining nonetheless.
this is why i hate religion, instead of just beleiving in unproven shit them selves they try to bring others down with them.
It sounds like this site and organization are good for a laugh...lavadisk wrote:
"The Net Authority is an organization dedicated to the removal of offensive material from the Internet."
These people made a site that attempts to change the internet to something they want it to be.
A useless attempt. Yes. But. What gets me the most upset is how they use Christianity in almost every one of their reasons justifying the crusade they are trying to do.
Here are some of the things they rate certain sites on:
* Pornographic material - Alright I guess. But they aren't going to actually succeed taking any of it down.
* Hateful material - A bad thing...
* Blasphemy - this is where they start getting stupid
* Offensive political material -........
* Bestiality and/or interracial relationships - Interracial? Wow.
A funny rule they use to determine if something is an "obvious violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy"
Example #2: Children's Dinosaur Stories. You might think that a site that contains stories about dinosaurs for children would be innocent—but let's stop and think about that for a moment. If you read the bible (you should, it's great!) you know that dinosaurs never actually existed, and that God put those fossils and bones there to test our faith in Him. While the stories themselves may not contain any offensive material, the simple fact that they are about dinosaurs may cause a child to question his faith in the one true God. By blaspheming, this site is in violation of the Internet Acceptable Use Policy and should be added to our database.
source: http://www.netauthority.org/submit.shtml
This is why I hate most Christians in today's society. They use their religion to put them selfs above everybody else. Once people put them in the "I'm better than everyone else so everyone else is wrong" mind set, they make huge and stupid mistakes.
P.s. I don't mind anyone who worships on their own. I just hate anyone, no matter what religion, who thinks that everyone who doesn't worship the same religion or worship the same way is wrong.
Last edited by Turquoise (2007-06-22 22:49:57)
You forgot 'Blasphemy'Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/F … ac/dst.jpg
I think I could manage to get us listed for all 5 of those, given a chance..................
Sound like the KKKEnder2309 wrote:
better say this first: http://www.netauthority.org/buttons/violator_80x15.gif
# Thou shalt not post materials concerning bestiality, including interracial relationships.
God did not intend for different species or races to intermingle sexually. Any content that contradicts this natural law, directly or indirectly, is strictly forbidden.
OK, i'm not even going to argue with them on the point of bestiality. that shit is sick. but interracial relationships? WHAT THE FUCK. how is that not hateful? how does that not violate rule number two? how? how does it not violate 4 or 5? how is that not against my beliefs? is this not 2007? did i take a time machine back to 1907? oops!
This is far and away the best example on the page:
Example #3: Family Farm Website. A personal website detailing one's adventures on the family farm sounds like a lot of fun! Especially if there are photos of the farm animals and equipment. Such a website would be very entertaining to old and young minds alike! But imagine that some of the photos of animals included the animal genitalia in plain site. This is hardly something that young children should be looking at, and especially not to be associated with the joy of viewing a fun website. By associating a feeling of joy with animal genitalia, this website would be an extreme danger to children and should definitely be added to the Net Authority database as a bestiality offender.
I don't know about you guys, but I've always gotten wood watching Charlotte's web. What can I say, that piggie has a sweet mouth. Knock those teeth out, get a jar of peanut butter........
Example #3: Family Farm Website. A personal website detailing one's adventures on the family farm sounds like a lot of fun! Especially if there are photos of the farm animals and equipment. Such a website would be very entertaining to old and young minds alike! But imagine that some of the photos of animals included the animal genitalia in plain site. This is hardly something that young children should be looking at, and especially not to be associated with the joy of viewing a fun website. By associating a feeling of joy with animal genitalia, this website would be an extreme danger to children and should definitely be added to the Net Authority database as a bestiality offender.
I don't know about you guys, but I've always gotten wood watching Charlotte's web. What can I say, that piggie has a sweet mouth. Knock those teeth out, get a jar of peanut butter........
To quote commentary on 'Conservapedia':Ty wrote:
AH HA HA HA HA HAAA!!
HA HA HA HAA!
HA HA HAA!
Ahh yes. 'Lol' just doesn't say it. How pathetic. Entertaining nonetheless.
"This is an unintentional gold mine of hilarity."
EDIT: I'm gonna report natauthority to themselves...
/self pwned.
Last edited by cyborg_ninja-117 (2007-06-23 03:19:00)
I'll do you one better. I'm writing in to the "Chaser's War on Everything" and suggesting these people for "Nut Job of the Week". Last week is was some christian group who thought they had a cure for homosexuality.
Offending website's name:
i hope you die while trying to shutdown websites
URL of offending website:
http://killyourself.org
Problem solved.
i hope you die while trying to shutdown websites
URL of offending website:
http://killyourself.org
Problem solved.
But i can't wait till next Wednesday!mcminty wrote:
I'll do you one better. I'm writing in to the "Chaser's War on Everything" and suggesting these people for "Nut Job of the Week". Last week is was some christian group who thought they had a cure for homosexuality.
Last edited by Doms (2007-06-23 03:25:04)
Nah man, it's best of stuff until September when they get ready for the election...Doms wrote:
But i can't wait till next Wednesday!mcminty wrote:
I'll do you one better. I'm writing in to the "Chaser's War on Everything" and suggesting these people for "Nut Job of the Week". Last week is was some christian group who thought they had a cure for homosexuality.
Is the segment actually called "Nutjob of the week"?
isnt the season finished?Doms wrote:
Offending website's name:
i hope you die while trying to shutdown websites
URL of offending website:
http://killyourself.org
Problem solved.But i can't wait till next Wednesday!mcminty wrote:
I'll do you one better. I'm writing in to the "Chaser's War on Everything" and suggesting these people for "Nut Job of the Week". Last week is was some christian group who thought they had a cure for homosexuality.
i think they are showing season 1 next week
EDIT: beaten by 8 seconds
Last edited by weasel_thingo (2007-06-23 03:29:02)
Okay, hands up here if you HAVEN'T reported net "authority" to itself?
Anyone?
*watches the tumbleweed blow by*
Anyone?
*watches the tumbleweed blow by*
Is there anyone who monitors internet racism in the US? We could report them to them. That could be great.
In Europe they would be in contravention of the Council of Europe Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on the Criminalisation of Acts of a Racist or Xenophobic Nature Committed through Computer Systems. Something tells me these nutters are from the US though.
In Europe they would be in contravention of the Council of Europe Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime on the Criminalisation of Acts of a Racist or Xenophobic Nature Committed through Computer Systems. Something tells me these nutters are from the US though.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2007-06-23 03:54:47)
+1
Has anyone else been through their "database" and gone through most of the comments left? That stuff is hilarious!
Check the dates. Many co-incide with the creation of this threadFenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Has anyone else been through their "database" and gone through most of the comments left? That stuff is hilarious!
My favourite so far:crimson_grunt wrote:
Check the dates. Many co-incide with the creation of this threadFenris_GreyClaw wrote:
Has anyone else been through their "database" and gone through most of the comments left? That stuff is hilarious!
Comments
Please leave all comments regarding the Liberal Party of Australia website below.
God 06/06/2007 - 02:41:52
Go John Howard!
Last edited by Fenris_GreyClaw (2007-06-23 04:22:12)
lol
Fox News is banned by them! At least they got something right.
Fox News is banned by them! At least they got something right.
Seconded, did the same. Because as a "non-Christian" and a mix of Cherokee, Irish, and Scottish races, I find this website VERY offensive.twiistaaa wrote:
some one should submit it to fark so it can be crashed.
also i submitted Net Authority as an offending site. but part of me thinks the whole thing is a joke?
For all their high-handed talk about morals and perverts/hate-mongers, whoever runs that site is letting their blatant racism show through. Race does not equal Species in the least!
Not to mention bestiality.Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:
You forgot 'Blasphemy'Flaming_Maniac wrote:
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/F … ac/dst.jpg