I have noticed when you have 2 good sides that are evenly matched with good players....MEC are always disadvantaged and usually lose. If you have a better MEC side then ofcourse they can get the win...but when both sides are evenly matched MEC appears to be the one that has alot to do to get the win. Anyone else think this? It's just something I have noticed whilst playing highly competitive 64 player servers.
if you are talking about on karkand, then yes, it is usually the case if USMC can cap a flag
no your just terrible - mec equals ultimate baserape on karkand
Jalalabad. Karkand.
MEC has the better and easier to use weapons so yeah not really i disagree.
MEC owns USMC msot of the time
MEC owns USMC msot of the time
ok just saying what I have experienced over the last week or so.
The offensive always has an advantage over the defensive when the teams are evenly matched.
If you mean on Karkand, yes, the USMC nade-spammers have the initial advantage, but on larger maps with vehicles, the two are roughly even.
MEC usually seems to win on Oman.
MEC usually seems to win on Oman.
Try Sharqi. I think MEC has the advantage
The defending team always has it harder in this game because your team hates to defend the back bases.
Yeah, ever notice that the mec will always lose the factory or suburb to one or two lone us guys?Reject_Wolf wrote:
The defending team always has it harder in this game because your team hates to defend the back bases.
or that the USMC loses the tv station because the whole team is on the roof?
Not really i rape MEC with just an M16 cause it is more accurate than the AK-101. I usually pick of 3-5 people and then we rush a flag as a diversion while soem guys go for suburb. Thats the way to rape the hell outta MEC.Blehm98 wrote:
MEC has the better and easier to use weapons so yeah not really i disagree.
MEC owns USMC msot of the time
The MEC doesn't always lose on Mashturr City, because neither team is playing defensively.