Liberal-Sl@yer wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/25/BAGELQL66N1.DTL
Yes apparently Staph is running rampent in american hospitals. This explains why my uncle caught staph and his knee swelled up to the size of a cantolope. Something seriously needs to be done about this. I mean the hostpitals are goverment run for christ sakes, why arent they in better shape? I really dont see why my uncle has to suffer for another 2 months with a knee still twice its normal size.
1. I don't know of any hospitals that are government run, outside of the VA system. And I work in the medical field. There are public hospitals, to be sure, but while they accept public funding (medicare, medicaid, etc), they are by no means government run. They are autonomous.
2. Staph is a nasty little bugger. We've been battling it for thousands of years, and will continue to do so for thousands more. Everyone carries Staph in their nose (among other places), the problem is that the presense of a mutated form that is resistant to Methicillin-type pharmaceuticals (of which penicillin is a member, along with other beta-lactam antibiotics [cephalosporins, cephamycins and carbapenems]). You have to treat these infections with other (more expensive) antibiotics. The hospital that I used to work for chose clindamyacin, to help prevent the spread of VRSA (vancomyasin resistant staph), whereas most adult hospitals choose to treat MRSA with vanc. The only known cases of VRSA to pop up thus far have come from the prison population. Fortunately, at this point, any bacteria that is vanc resistant will respond to a methicillin. When a bug manages to evolve that is resistant, we'll be in a bit of a pickle, with only 2 or 3 fallbacks.
There's no magic bullet to treat staph. We know that alcohol, along with the vast majority of hospital cleansers kill it, but the problem is that people don't want their hospitals to look like, well, hospitals. They want carpet and wallpaper, where tile and paint are much easier to disinfect. It, like everything else in medicine, is a tradeoff.
EDIT
I just read that article. It's scaremongering bullshit. MRSA isn't 2.5 times more lethal than staph. It's equally as lethal. The problem is identifying it as a MRSA strain, and treating it as such. This is the kind of shite that makes medicine such a shitty profession. We've know about the problem for damn near a decade, and a newspaper article that makes people afraid to go to the hospital doesn't help anything. This tripe makes it sound like a brand new problem that we're not doing anything to address, when that's just not the case.
Last edited by blisteringsilence (2007-06-26 00:55:30)