Did you read the stories - it said the judge let off another rapist earlier too
You are all over-seeing the fact that he "RAPED" her. You are worrying about the thong.
Raping someone is a lot of time in jail.
Raping someone is a lot of time in jail.
I agree Bull3t, the bottomline is she was RAPED AT THE AGE OF TEN. NO EXCUSE. He should of gotten 20 years plus. The Judge probably is a pedophile himself.
A 10 year old would consent to anything, he needs shot. period.
wow thats nasty...even if someone is dressed provactive doesnt mean
u freakin rape them. i mean control urself damn it..
that judge should burn in hell along with the man he let go
u freakin rape them. i mean control urself damn it..
that judge should burn in hell along with the man he let go
If the title is underage sex, you wouldn't say that now would you. The girl WANTED it, it was of her consent.RAVENMkXV wrote:
wow thats nasty...even if someone is dressed provactive doesnt mean
u freakin rape them. i mean control urself damn it..
that judge should burn in hell along with the man he let go
She was 10 fucking years old, There is no way she had a clue as to what the fuck she was consenting too.
If it was your child I'd kill you for letting your 10 year old dress that way, and for raising her in such a manner that she thought (apparently) it was ok to have sex at that age.Ruckel wrote:
I wonder how long that raper will live, if it was my child he would be dead.
My thirteen year old niece had consensual sex and we still made sure the bastard did time. Yes, she has mental issues, but that just means that they guy is taking advantage of someone. Some times you have to protect people from themselves, that especially rings true for children. I would hope that the authorities would step in if some ahole was showing my 10 year old son how to shoot a gun or smoke crack, even if it was consensual. It is no different than if he had supplied her with drugs or alcohol. Apparently she didn't know better and he contributed to the delinquency of a minor taking advantage of her poor education and social training.
Last edited by KnowMeByTrailOfDead (2007-06-27 11:22:55)
Ignorance of the law is NEVER an excuse.PureFodder wrote:
It's like there's two entirely different threads going on at the same time, one for those who read The Sun's willfully misleading version and one for those who read the actual 'news' reports on the case.
This is about two people having consensual sex, then the bloke discovering she was actually ten, not about some bloke who knowingly abducted and raped a ten year old.
The fact is he didn't verify that she was 16, as stupid as that sounds.
Whether she's 8 or 80, if she is NOT of Legal Age of Consent, it's statuatory rape. Period.
yeah right, like we Europeans are all the same, you're sooooo wrong. I wouldn't be suprised if something like this happened in AmericaHURLEY wrote:
Only in europe...
Sarcasm really is lost on some people...suomalainen_äijä wrote:
yeah right, like we Europeans are all the same, you're sooooo wrong. I wouldn't be suprised if something like this happened in AmericaHURLEY wrote:
Only in europe...
In America, they have guys who can buy quickly a gun and shoot 30 persons in a University. That's better....
This story with raped girl is disgusting....
This Judge would be suspended !
This story with raped girl is disgusting....
This Judge would be suspended !
I find it hard to believe that a 10-year-old English girl looked like she was 16. If it was an Italian girl, maybe, but English? No.
Regardless, Judge needs to have someone unscrew his head.
Regardless, Judge needs to have someone unscrew his head.
i think we should tell jigsaw about the judge
And shit down his neck.The_Mac wrote:
I find it hard to believe that a 10-year-old English girl looked like she was 16. If it was an Italian girl, maybe, but English? No.
Regardless, Judge needs to have someone unscrew his head.
What I find hardest to believe about this story is that perhaps 4 people in 60 odd posts have actually read the BBC article and not just commented on the title and the Sun.
What I find worst is about this Darren Wright guy...ghettoperson wrote:
What I find hardest to believe about this story is that perhaps 4 people in 60 odd posts have actually read the BBC article and not just commented on the title and the Sun.
before an accomplice, Darren Wright, 34, took her home and sexually assaulted her.
Wright is already free as Judge Hall had already given him a nine-month sentence for inciting the girl to perform a sex act.
Like wtf. The other dude had sexually assaulted her and he's set free? What a load of bullshit.
Look, shes 10, and thus can't consent, she could have yelled at the top of her voice 'fuck me now' she's still not consenting because shes under age, she simply can't legally consent, non-consentual sex = rape, in this case statutory rape, saying 'i thought she was 16' is no defense and should have been stopped from the beginning, any fucking kiddy fiddler can say that.
Exactly.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
10 year old wearing a thong... And rapist set free... What has the world come to.
1 - Parent should be flogged. None of this "but it's stylish mommy" crap.
2 - The rapist should be castrated. There is no rehab for a sicko that does 10 year old girls.
Why the hell would you listen to the Sun Newspaper. They are rubbish. The BBC report actually makes it clearer and less controversial. Plus if you believe what the papers say then you really are an idiot.
At least he had a carreer
"They said the judge stated that doctors who examined the girl believed she was in her mid-teens and she was treated by most people as older than her actual age."
What the fuck kind of doctor mistakes a 10 year old for a teenager?
What the fuck kind of doctor mistakes a 10 year old for a teenager?
Why can't they just ask how old she is =.= Probably she hit puberty reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal early.Hurricane wrote:
"They said the judge stated that doctors who examined the girl believed she was in her mid-teens and she was treated by most people as older than her actual age."
What the fuck kind of doctor mistakes a 10 year old for a teenager?
I love how everyone's assuming that it would be dead easy to tell she's ten. Do you have that little faith in medical professionals?