ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|7121

buLLet_t00th wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:


Penryn is for desktop. Penryn will defiantly need a new motherboard coz it's 45nm.
Penryn will still use LGA-775, not to say that it'll work. It needs the proper VRM implementation. Not sure which support it (if any, currently), but at least a few will come.
The P35 MOBOs have been out for a while, they're the only ones that support 45nm at the moment. I think the next type to support are X38 and G38 (correct me if Im wrong about the exact names).
You're right about the X35 boards, haven't heard about the G38's though.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7188

ghettoperson wrote:

buLLet_t00th wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:


Penryn will still use LGA-775, not to say that it'll work. It needs the proper VRM implementation. Not sure which support it (if any, currently), but at least a few will come.
The P35 MOBOs have been out for a while, they're the only ones that support 45nm at the moment. I think the next type to support are X38 and G38 (correct me if Im wrong about the exact names).
You're right about the X35 boards, haven't heard about the G38's though.
G38's are like the crappy version of the X35, because of the integrated graphics.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
SoC./Omega
Member
+122|7013|Omaha, Nebraska!
I will be buying the E6550 at Christmas.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7188

SoC./Omega wrote:

I will be buying the E6550 at Christmas.
Another price drop in September.
https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png
Manicalwizard
Member
+2|6608

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

SoC./Omega wrote:

I will be buying the E6550 at Christmas.
Another price drop in September.
How are they going to get any cheaper!!!! They're already cheap by now even without the July 22 price drop.
JaMrulezass
Member
+47|6936|Hong Kong
HERE IN HONG KONG!! THERES SIX DAYS LEFT wotwoot. i cant wait. Do any one of you have any idea how desperate I am? I run Supreme Commander all on the lowest of the lowest seettings and when I play the campaign and get lots of units, I lag like shit.

Last edited by JaMrulezass (2007-07-16 04:02:11)

Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7021|UK

Isnt that a graphics problem :S ^^^
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

Bell wrote:

Isnt that a graphics problem :S ^^^
Probably not. Supreme Commander is very CPU intensive.
JaMrulezass
Member
+47|6936|Hong Kong

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:

Isnt that a graphics problem :S ^^^
Probably not. Supreme Commander is very CPU intensive.
Yup, apparently quad cores are just about enough. Even dual cores have problems.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7053|SE London

JaMrulezass wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:

Isnt that a graphics problem :S ^^^
Probably not. Supreme Commander is very CPU intensive.
Yup, apparently quad cores are just about enough. Even dual cores have problems.
Runs ok on my OCd 6300.

Bit of lag when there are loads of units onscreen. But usually pretty smooth.
JaMrulezass
Member
+47|6936|Hong Kong

Bertster7 wrote:

JaMrulezass wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


Probably not. Supreme Commander is very CPU intensive.
Yup, apparently quad cores are just about enough. Even dual cores have problems.
Runs ok on my OCd 6300.

Bit of lag when there are loads of units onscreen. But usually pretty smooth.
One thing I dont get about the game is why the one hit K.O tanks. it takes like a 100 of them to kill one of those point defense things, the ones you have to destroy in the UEF Campaign Mission 1. Why not make some more stronger units and like we can have less of them isntead of having weak units and trillions of them.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard