Pages: 1
well for me it would be driving up there but I'll bring the easton for fun and the glock to make lasting impressionDavid.P wrote:
So does anyone else wanna go down there and fuck em up?
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2007-07-25 20:00:42)
When I was in the Corps we evacuated people from Liberia....I hope this person was not one of them. If he is, he should go back.SEREMAKER wrote:
ROCKVILLE, Md. — A Liberian native once facing child rape and abuse charges in Maryland now is considered a "free man" by local police, a week after a judge dismissed his case.
http://www.foxnews.com/images/301158/7_ … nneh01.jpg
I have followed this off and on, and the whole thing I believe is bullshit
Oh well then he can do what he wants then.m8v2 wrote:
He didn't have a trail so we don't know if he was guilty or not. Beside that you can't prosecute a person if they can't defend themselves. He most likely can't speak very good English and wouldn't be able to put up a responsible defense or understand the scope of the charges against him.
I'm not saying that I'm just saying I wouldn't want to see a possibly innocent person get prosecuted while he can't defend himself properly.usmarine2005 wrote:
Oh well then he can do what he wants then.m8v2 wrote:
He didn't have a trail so we don't know if he was guilty or not. Beside that you can't prosecute a person if they can't defend themselves. He most likely can't speak very good English and wouldn't be able to put up a responsible defense or understand the scope of the charges against him.
doesn't matter, they could draw the fucker a picture ----------------m8v2 wrote:
He didn't have a trail so we don't know if he was guilty or not. Beside that you can't prosecute a person if they can't defend themselves. He most likely can't speak very good English and wouldn't be able to put up a responsible defense or understand the scope of the charges against him.
well one of the big points the defending lawyers were pushing was "speedy trial" but it took the courts a long time to find a interpurterm8v2 wrote:
I'm not saying that I'm just saying I wouldn't want to see a possibly innocent person get prosecuted while he can't defend himself properly.usmarine2005 wrote:
Oh well then he can do what he wants then.m8v2 wrote:
He didn't have a trail so we don't know if he was guilty or not. Beside that you can't prosecute a person if they can't defend themselves. He most likely can't speak very good English and wouldn't be able to put up a responsible defense or understand the scope of the charges against him.
So you would want a possibly innocent person wait in jail while they struggle to find a interpurter or you would want him to go straight to jail without a fair trail?SEREMAKER wrote:
well one of the big points the defending lawyers were pushing was "speedy trial" but it took the courts a long time to find a interpurterm8v2 wrote:
I'm not saying that I'm just saying I wouldn't want to see a possibly innocent person get prosecuted while he can't defend himself properly.usmarine2005 wrote:
Oh well then he can do what he wants then.
you're not getting it, the courts were getting him an interpurter (thats fine even though he went through h.s. and college in the states) but bc it took awhile for the courts to find a interpurter his lawyers said he was denied a "speedy trial" ..... theres a difference between jail and prisonm8v2 wrote:
So you would want a possibly innocent person wait in jail while they struggle to find a interpurter or you would want him to go straight to jail without a fair trail?SEREMAKER wrote:
well one of the big points the defending lawyers were pushing was "speedy trial" but it took the courts a long time to find a interpurterm8v2 wrote:
I'm not saying that I'm just saying I wouldn't want to see a possibly innocent person get prosecuted while he can't defend himself properly.
Eh fair enough you winSEREMAKER wrote:
you're not getting it, the courts were getting him an interpurter (thats fine even though he went through h.s. and college in the states) but bc it took awhile for the courts to find a interpurter his lawyers said he was denied a "speedy trial" ..... theres a difference between jail and prisonm8v2 wrote:
So you would want a possibly innocent person wait in jail while they struggle to find a interpurter or you would want him to go straight to jail without a fair trail?SEREMAKER wrote:
well one of the big points the defending lawyers were pushing was "speedy trial" but it took the courts a long time to find a interpurter
Pages: 1
