and he brings the ace out early. The old Clinton vs. Bush, I'll take a president with a fondness for blowjobs and taxes, over a president with a fetish for shitty wars and oil.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Is Good News Really Bad News For Democrats?
wow...lol.Reciprocity wrote:
and he brings the ace out early. The old Clinton vs. Bush, I'll take a president with a fondness for blowjobs and taxes, over a president with a fetish for shitty wars and oil.
Agreed...Reciprocity wrote:
and he brings the ace out early. The old Clinton vs. Bush, I'll take a president with a fondness for blowjobs and taxes, over a president with a fetish for shitty wars and oil.
I'd rather have Nader or Ron Paul over both of them, but oh well...
The truth is his fondness for taxes and masturbation* while cutting the Military and Intelligence budgets instead of good leadership and his avoiding addressing 10 terrorist attacks for 8 years, led us to war.
Ps there is no Good war, if you think you ever get to fight the right war at the time you choose your lost.
The best thing about this war is were fighting the right people in the own back yard…now anyway.
* During a perjury trial over a slander suit.
He testified he never got a blow job, he “ I just masturbated on her dress. “
Its sad but I think I would have more respect for him if he got actually got laid and inhaled
Ps there is no Good war, if you think you ever get to fight the right war at the time you choose your lost.
The best thing about this war is were fighting the right people in the own back yard…now anyway.
* During a perjury trial over a slander suit.
He testified he never got a blow job, he “ I just masturbated on her dress. “
Its sad but I think I would have more respect for him if he got actually got laid and inhaled
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Is Good News Really Bad News For Democrats?