RECONDO67
Member
+60|7075|miami FL
we have more fucking Muslims here in the states and you idiots worry about some wannabes from south of the border.
I know that many of you look for any reason to blame other minorities for your problems.
aipotwckma
Member
+5|7094
What's your point in making this thread?

Your opinion is already an epic failure, IMO.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7114|Canberra, AUS

usmarine2005 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

The Neocon nightmare.
The Neolib dream.
Not really. Neolibs and neocons are quite similar in beliefs and in mindsets. Plus they're both insane.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|7088

usmarine2005 wrote:

close the border now!
NOW!!!!!!!!!
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|7088

aipotwckma wrote:

What's your point in making this thread?

Your opinion is already an epic failure, IMO.
Are you from Mexico..?!

I wonder if Bennet has started suicide car bombings in bf2 yet..
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6968|Global Command

aipotwckma wrote:

What's your point in making this thread?

Your opinion is already an epic failure, IMO.
Not quite the epic failure Mexico is.


Why is it you people can dump millions of people onto our streets and yet cry racism anytime somebody like me gets nervous about it?


Mexico is such an epic failure it should be annexed by the U.S., it's government replaced and the drug farms carpet bombed.
Shopvac
If it doesn't say shop-vac keep shopping!
+25|6979|Grand Rapids, MI

ATG wrote:

Mexico is such an epic failure it should be annexed by the U.S., it's government replaced and the drug farms carpet bombed.
It's exactly this kind of talk that makes people not take anything else you say seriously. To me, these words are on par with saying we should just blow up the entire middle east to end terrorism -- as if threatening to blow up an entire region of the Earth thus committing genocide wasn't a terrorist tactic.

For me, it is difficult at best to defend your argument as wholly rational when you suggest annexing THE REST of Mexico for the United States. Although, if you think there's too many Mexicans in the US now, try extending the US border to Guatemala and see how you like the new demographic profile. Hell, throw in the right to vote for the former Mexican citizens and this idea is sounding better and better. . . if it wasn't completely psychotic.

P.S. Don't entertain the thought for a single minute that the US government isn't as completely broken as the Mexican.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7249|NÃ¥rvei

Mexican muslims

You are able to dig up the most incredible paranoid shit ATG

Viva Mexifornia et tu Viva Mexas .....

Last edited by Varegg (2007-08-10 06:28:33)

Wait behind the line ..............................................................
David.P
Banned
+649|6713

Spark wrote:

usmarine2005 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

The Neocon nightmare.
The Neolib dream.
Not really. Neolibs and neocons are quite similar in beliefs and in mindsets. Plus they're both insane.
And you have to bold everything you type in order to get attention.(Thats just sad man real sad...)
JahManRed
wank
+646|7067|IRELAND

Shopvac wrote:

ATG wrote:

Mexico is such an epic failure it should be annexed by the U.S., it's government replaced and the drug farms carpet bombed.
It's exactly this kind of talk that makes people not take anything else you say seriously. To me, these words are on par with saying we should just blow up the entire middle east to end terrorism -- as if threatening to blow up an entire region of the Earth thus committing genocide wasn't a terrorist tactic.
Think he has said just that in the past.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6968|Global Command
Prove it.

Sarcasm is lost.
RECONDO67
Member
+60|7075|miami FL
too many haters here   I sense too many crackers.
Madison B.
Member
+4|6550

Turquoise wrote:

As long as they aren't embracing Wahhabism/Salafism or any of the barbaric pre-Islamic customs of the Middle East, then I don't see a problem with it.

Now if they start uniting religion and government...  that's where the trouble starts....
The majority of Muslims are Salafis... Wahabi is a western term for a practicing Salafi... You don't hear Wahabis calling themselves Wahabis.

Anyway a Salafi is one who follows the Quran and Sunnah and the way of life of the Salaf (those in the prophets generation & the Sahaba (the leaders after the their prophets death))

The Quran and Sunnah are a way of life. They have within them rulings & laws (ie stoning for adultery until death; 100 whips for premartial sex).

For Muslims living in non-Muslim land (and Islamically they can't unless they're there for Da'wah purposes (teaching others about Islam)) they are suppose to abide by the rules & laws of that country (unless the laws directly go AGAINST Islamic laws.. in other words.. a law like "you are not allowed to fast or pray." but not laws that say "adultery is not punishable".) So any true Salafi Muslim wouldn't go against Islamic laws (including the one that says you cannot kill yourself for ANY reason whatsoever)

Technically speaking it would be better to have Salafi Muslims around than any others because they won't be such a threat.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6844|North Carolina

Madison B. wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

As long as they aren't embracing Wahhabism/Salafism or any of the barbaric pre-Islamic customs of the Middle East, then I don't see a problem with it.

Now if they start uniting religion and government...  that's where the trouble starts....
The majority of Muslims are Salafis...
I find that hard to believe, but I know that TheDarkRaven could verify whether or not that is true.  And if he couldn't... well, I have a friend who lives in Istanbul.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard