nukchebi0
Пушкин, наше всё
+387|6801|New Haven, CT
8800GTS 512> 8800gtx
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6891|Finland

nukchebi0 wrote:

8800GTS 512> 8800gtx
no it's not.... GTX and Ultra are still faster...
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Slayer
---hates you
+1,137|7233|Hell, p.o box 666

nukchebi0 wrote:

8800GTS 512> 8800gtx
but you have any idea what you´re talking about right?!

It so ridiculous that you hypeboys come up with some weird conclusions when a new product is going to be released

Do you really think a company like Nvidia would release a new GPU for less money that outperforms their highend cards?! Well that would be the most stupid marketing move ever!

I guess this is going the same way like it was when the GT was released. But in the end, the hype shut up completley, as it´s so not rue that a GT is outperfoming a GTX or even Ultra. Period.
gvers
Bad at BF:BC2
+109|7149|The Real World

The G92 GTS is still under NDA so no site should have them listed. We don't have enough reliable reviews to know what the G92 GTS performance is. It's only a week away so we will find out then (or atleast I will ).
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7058|the dank(super) side of Oregon
better not be faster than an 8800gtx.  just took delivery today on an evga 8800gtx superclocked.
Slayer
---hates you
+1,137|7233|Hell, p.o box 666

dont worry!
gvers
Bad at BF:BC2
+109|7149|The Real World

I thought thie review said it gives a GTX a good run for it's money in Crysis @1920x1200 only being beaten by the 8800GTX Ultra XXX.

http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1234/ … index.html

But as I said earlier lets wait for some more reviews. I preordered mine because it was cheaper than the GT currently sells at.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard