Well, it's obvious that you don't, which is why I pointed it out to you. There's no need for the hostilities.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Because I have time to read every post ever written. Kthx.mikkel wrote:
This has already been covered previously in the thread.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Why is it that a teacher is sentenced for students naming a teddy bear Muhammed when that is one of the most popular names (over a wide variety of spelling variants) in Muslimland?
I'm not referring to the application, but to the practice in sentencing. The crux of the sentence emphasises this.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Because rape and incest is so like naming a teddy bear a common name.mikkel wrote:
There are many people in Western countries saying that people should be sentenced to death for rape and incest. That doesn't mean that the letter of the law is suspended to accomodate the masses. Same goes for Sudan.dayarath wrote:
Actually many people shouted she should be sentenced to death upon hearing this in Sudan, the woman thing was a mistype I'll edit now then and well, why do most islamic families call their firstborn Muhammed / mohammed, but it is wrong to name a bear that way?
Yeah, that pretty much seems to be the common sentiment.Flecco wrote:
Western hypocrisy - is it warrented?
Well, no. It's not.
But who's going to stop us?
Last edited by mikkel (2007-12-04 03:38:09)