http://www.victorhanson.com/articles/th … 12007.html
I’m going to wait a while to chime in. Please read the article…
Points:
1) America's turmoil-ridden birth when Europe wasn't dealing with the same challenges (thereby ignoring its own birth). The foundation of stereotyping Americans. Growing prejudices due to climatic advantages in an agrarian economy, aka jealously due to a quick economic rise. Also, Pre-EU reverse racism due to an American multiracial society. Agree?
2) “Americanization” in Europe automatically connotes something negative, threatening, and something to be avoided. Is this bigotry?
3) Please check out paragraph quote: “...do these attitudes really matter? Does European anti-Americanism affect substantially the policies and behavior of European governments?… In the end, European governments exploit irrational anti-Americanism in order to aggrandize their own global power and influence and thus compensate for their diminished economic, cultural, and political clout.” Your thoughts?
4) “The evil twin of anti-Americanism is anti-Semitism, the latter a European phenomenon deeply rooted in Europe’s history and culture.” “The Europeans’ enmity toward Israel cannot be detached from the Europeans’ thousand-year hatred of the Jews and their shorter and much less lethal, but still palpable, antipathy toward America.”
5) The massive 2003 rallies against the United States’ war in Iraq, as much an expression of distaste for America as distaste for war, was interpreted by many as the “birthday of a united Europe”. Agree?
6) Given the numerous political uses of European anti-Americanism, it is unlikely to abate anytime soon, despite the occasional election of European leaders friendly to America. Quite simply, anti-Americanism “has helped gain Europeans respect, affection, and — most important — political clout in the rest of the world, especially since Europe is unwilling and unable to finance a military power commensurate with its global ambitions. Let’s not forget too that many Europeans mistakenly believe that they can placate the jihadists by thwarting the policies of the latter’s greatest enemy. As Markovits conludes, “I see few incentives for Europe to divest itself of its current opposition to and antipathy for America and plenty to stay the course.” Pretty powerful accusation.
I’m going to wait a while to chime in. Please read the article…
Points:
1) America's turmoil-ridden birth when Europe wasn't dealing with the same challenges (thereby ignoring its own birth). The foundation of stereotyping Americans. Growing prejudices due to climatic advantages in an agrarian economy, aka jealously due to a quick economic rise. Also, Pre-EU reverse racism due to an American multiracial society. Agree?
2) “Americanization” in Europe automatically connotes something negative, threatening, and something to be avoided. Is this bigotry?
3) Please check out paragraph quote: “...do these attitudes really matter? Does European anti-Americanism affect substantially the policies and behavior of European governments?… In the end, European governments exploit irrational anti-Americanism in order to aggrandize their own global power and influence and thus compensate for their diminished economic, cultural, and political clout.” Your thoughts?
4) “The evil twin of anti-Americanism is anti-Semitism, the latter a European phenomenon deeply rooted in Europe’s history and culture.” “The Europeans’ enmity toward Israel cannot be detached from the Europeans’ thousand-year hatred of the Jews and their shorter and much less lethal, but still palpable, antipathy toward America.”
5) The massive 2003 rallies against the United States’ war in Iraq, as much an expression of distaste for America as distaste for war, was interpreted by many as the “birthday of a united Europe”. Agree?
6) Given the numerous political uses of European anti-Americanism, it is unlikely to abate anytime soon, despite the occasional election of European leaders friendly to America. Quite simply, anti-Americanism “has helped gain Europeans respect, affection, and — most important — political clout in the rest of the world, especially since Europe is unwilling and unable to finance a military power commensurate with its global ambitions. Let’s not forget too that many Europeans mistakenly believe that they can placate the jihadists by thwarting the policies of the latter’s greatest enemy. As Markovits conludes, “I see few incentives for Europe to divest itself of its current opposition to and antipathy for America and plenty to stay the course.” Pretty powerful accusation.