Well guess what. No tasers equal no taser incidents. Tasers will equal taser incidents.Spark wrote:
I have no problem with tasers and what I've seen here suggests the same.
What I DO have a problem with is the circumstances in which they are used.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-12-08 00:16:35)
QFTusmarine2005 wrote:
I have never been tasered by a cop. You want to know why? I follow the law and obey a cops commands.Spark wrote:
I have no problem with tasers and what I've seen here suggests the same.
What I DO have a problem with is the circumstances in which they are used.
Last edited by IG-Calibre (2007-12-08 04:33:40)
How do you drive? I mean if you are drunk or having a hungover you can't.usmarine2005 wrote:
Well guess what. No tasers equal no taser incidents. Tasers will equal taser incidents.Spark wrote:
I have no problem with tasers and what I've seen here suggests the same.
What I DO have a problem with is the circumstances in which they are used.
Get over it. People are human. Cops are put in high stress and unpredictable positions. I have never been tasered by a cop. You want to know why? I follow the law and obey a cops commands.
I know, been there, lol. The thing is marine said "I follow the law and obey a cops commands" and driving under the influence of beer is not following the law.Mekstizzle wrote:
I can assure you, it isn't that hard driving whilst hungover.
Ooooooooooooh yes. Yes. Mwahahaha.Mekstizzle wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing some Chavs get tased over here.
"wot u lukin at dik-ed"
bzzzzt.
*thud*
Do you know what state he lives in? Are you aware of the blood alcohol % that is allowed? Most likely .o8, it is in CT anyway. I dont drink anymore but if I were to have a beer or two and then drive it would be leagal.sergeriver wrote:
I know, been there, lol. The thing is marine said "I follow the law and obey a cops commands" and driving under the influence of beer is not following the law.Mekstizzle wrote:
I can assure you, it isn't that hard driving whilst hungover.
How about Iraq? Someone needs to start a thread about Iraq, or maybe Isreal.pirana6 wrote:
Is anyone else tired of these goddamn threads? I am. Enough of the police and their tasers. Let's talk about abortion or the presidential debate or something new...
Mekstizzle wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing some Chavs get tased over here.
"wot u lukin at dik-ed"
bzzzzt.
*thud*
If he is drunk he did not have one beer or two, lol.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Do you know what state he lives in? Are you aware of the blood alcohol % that is allowed? Most likely .o8, it is in CT anyway. I dont drink anymore but if I were to have a beer or two and then drive it would be leagal.sergeriver wrote:
I know, been there, lol. The thing is marine said "I follow the law and obey a cops commands" and driving under the influence of beer is not following the law.Mekstizzle wrote:
I can assure you, it isn't that hard driving whilst hungover.
I could start one about Bush if you wish.deeznutz1245 wrote:
How about Iraq? Someone needs to start a thread about Iraq, or maybe Isreal.pirana6 wrote:
Is anyone else tired of these goddamn threads? I am. Enough of the police and their tasers. Let's talk about abortion or the presidential debate or something new...
No guns equal no gun incidents, No police equal no police incidents... that's the lamest argument ever.usmarine2005 wrote:
Well guess what. No tasers equal no taser incidents. Tasers will equal taser incidents.Spark wrote:
I have no problem with tasers and what I've seen here suggests the same.
What I DO have a problem with is the circumstances in which they are used.
Get over it. People are human. Cops are put in high stress and unpredictable positions. I have never been tasered by a cop. You want to know why? I follow the law and obey a cops commands.
Agreed.DrunkFace wrote:
No guns equal no gun incidents, No police equal no police incidents... that's the lamest argument ever.usmarine2005 wrote:
Well guess what. No tasers equal no taser incidents. Tasers will equal taser incidents.Spark wrote:
I have no problem with tasers and what I've seen here suggests the same.
What I DO have a problem with is the circumstances in which they are used.
Get over it. People are human. Cops are put in high stress and unpredictable positions. I have never been tasered by a cop. You want to know why? I follow the law and obey a cops commands.
As spark said there is nothing wrong, and I actually support tasers, it's just the unjustified use that I and most people are against. IMO tasers should be an alternative to a firearms not a tool to shut someone up who's asking too many questions.
PureFodder wrote:
This article is about replacing the guns used by armed response units wth tazers, not giving a tazer to every cop on the beat.
Option not replacement.Sir Hugh said the PSNI was the only force in the UK and Ireland not to have tasers and he "has had sleepless nights about officers using firearms when they could have a less lethal option available to them".
Yeah, my point was that it's still only the armed response type police units that will be getting the tazers, not the average bobby on the beat.mikeyb118 wrote:
PureFodder wrote:
This article is about replacing the guns used by armed response units wth tazers, not giving a tazer to every cop on the beat.Option not replacement.Sir Hugh said the PSNI was the only force in the UK and Ireland not to have tasers and he "has had sleepless nights about officers using firearms when they could have a less lethal option available to them".