2 or 3 Aircraft carrier strike groups isnt to subtle
Neither the Americans nor the Iranians want a war anytime soon, It's Ahmadinejad saying idiotic things on TV, and then our leaders jump all over him. Iran cannot afford to power itself solely with fossil fuels, and needs nuclear power to stay competitive in the world market. Why Ahmadimanidiotjad won't just come out and say it, I'll never know. i think hes just trying to win over the hardcore religious leaders, since he has failed at winning over the general public.FEOS wrote:
Just curious...what "crazy war rhetoric" has been bandied about? All the pressure on Iran has been diplomatic. Much of it coming from Europe.
draft! draft! draft!
draft! draft! draft!usmarine2005 wrote:
draft! draft! draft!
I need the company
where do I sign?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
draft! draft! draft!usmarine2005 wrote:
draft! draft! draft!
you dont, just sit tight and somebody will be at your door eventually.S.Lythberg wrote:
where do I sign?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
draft! draft! draft!usmarine2005 wrote:
draft! draft! draft!
lol, The draft card came in the mail on my 18th birthday, they don't waste any time do they?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
you dont, just sit tight and somebody will be at your door eventually.S.Lythberg wrote:
where do I sign?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
draft! draft! draft!
Im sort of getting drafted, Im supposed to get out next june. Now I cant even if I wanted to. Its called stop-loss.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2007-12-13 19:28:08)
So many retarded posts in this thread. Uuuuyyyyy.
You're not being drafted. You're being told you have to sign up for Selective Service. Just like every 18 year old in America has had to do since they abolished the draft over 30 years ago.S.Lythberg wrote:
lol, The draft card came in the mail on my 18th birthday, they don't waste any time do they?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
you dont, just sit tight and somebody will be at your door eventually.S.Lythberg wrote:
where do I sign?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Can u show me how to drive a Bradley?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I need the company
easy as shit, gunning for the bradley is actually a tad bit complicated.
I say we should temporarily shut down Iran's uranium enrichment program, Ahmoudinejad is too dangerous to be allowed such technology, especially after operating in secrecy a few times from the IAEA and wanting to blast Israel off the earth. We should only consider granting them this the moment they have a reasonable government with no loudmouthed idiot like Ahmoudinejad, also I do not approve of religiously led countries which treat women like we still live in the middle ages.
inane little opines
Do you honestly think they'll stop developing nuclear technology just because we tell them to? We might be able to force them to stop enriching uranium openly, but they're sure to continue in secrecy.dayarath wrote:
I say we should temporarily shut down Iran's uranium enrichment program, Ahmoudinejad is too dangerous to be allowed such technology, especially after operating in secrecy a few times from the IAEA and wanting to blast Israel off the earth. We should only consider granting them this the moment they have a reasonable government with no loudmouthed idiot like Ahmoudinejad, also I do not approve of religiously led countries which treat women like we still live in the middle ages.
There really is no surefire way of ending this program unless we overthrow Iran's government, but that would be a horrible move.
It's kind of like in America. Iran have a growing and strengthening internal opposition to their crazyass megalomaniac leader and the US have a similar opposition to their own crazyass megalomaniac leader. Common sense eventually prevails.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071214/wl_afp/iranpoliticsvotereformist_071214153423
not all news coming out from persia is bad
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-12-15 10:01:38)
well if we put on enough pressure and routinely investigations by IAEA / UN they shouldn't be able to, neither could anyone else help them because that would destroy their reputation in the IAEA. If we could get full room via hard sanctions and control their uranium in/output for the time being all should go well, you don't just develop a nuclear weapon in secrecy as an open state, the soviet times are over.Turquoise wrote:
Do you honestly think they'll stop developing nuclear technology just because we tell them to? We might be able to force them to stop enriching uranium openly, but they're sure to continue in secrecy.dayarath wrote:
I say we should temporarily shut down Iran's uranium enrichment program, Ahmoudinejad is too dangerous to be allowed such technology, especially after operating in secrecy a few times from the IAEA and wanting to blast Israel off the earth. We should only consider granting them this the moment they have a reasonable government with no loudmouthed idiot like Ahmoudinejad, also I do not approve of religiously led countries which treat women like we still live in the middle ages.
There really is no surefire way of ending this program unless we overthrow Iran's government, but that would be a horrible move.
inane little opines
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071214/wl_afp/iranpoliticsvotereformist_071214153423
not all news coming out from persia is bad

Hot hand on the dice game baby girl!
I think the name of the party that dude belongs to is pretty funny. The association of combatant clerics or something like that.
I'm sure you're well qualified to call people out on whether they're Childish or not.Turquoise wrote:
It's rather ironic that you'd label him as childish and then act that way yourself.
We're not talking about economics, we're talking about Nukes getting in the hands of oppressive leaders. I reiterate: The United States and the West don't want to nuke the world and spread their religion as a theocracy everywhere, can you comprehend that? Or are just brainwashed to rewrite things as they suit you?So seriously, why don't we just admit that the real reason behind this antagonism is not due to civilized traits or the lack thereof?... It's about economics. Iran doesn't play by our rules, and they are leading the way in getting OPEC to use Euros instead of dollars. We obviously don't like that.
Clearly you've never studied history, all politicians play waiting games, saying things but not wanting to become too aggressive til the time is right.Ahmadinejad may have said things against Israel on many occasions, but is that anywhere near as aggressive as Israel dealt with Lebanon recently?
I'm sure you've heard Adolf Hitler; he was able to manipulate the West's fear of fighting, a fear not unlike the type you have exhibited , as well as purporting racist ideas. Then he struck. This nut is waiting for the time to strike while rallying his people around racist and nationalist ideas.
That's a load of shit. Saudi Arabia doesn't plan on nuking the West or taking over the world. I don't quite follow what you mean by "playing ball by our rules" are you just being ambiguous to sound intelligent?The truth is... We ally with aggressive nations as long as they serve our business interests. If Iran played ball by our rules, we'd favor them like we do Saudi Arabia. Because they don't, we point our own aggression toward them while telling them not to arm themselves more. Hell, we even backed a major war against them in the 80s. Can you really expect them to like us?
If you mean, "trying to get nukes" then yes, I would say they're not playing by the rules, especially with Ahmadinejad as "president."
I reiterate:
West: Does not want to take over teh world and nuke everybody.
Iran&Palestine etc.: Does.
Should Iran be given the capacity to have missiles? No. It's that simple, this concession is akin to conceding Adolf Hitler Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia.
My point ousted Mr. "I have a degree in International Politics" when he seemed to suggest that "modern architecture" determines a cultural outlook.
GS do Bradleys use the same/similar gunning controls to Strykers?
Israel developed a nuclear program in secret, and with the help of France, I might add.dayarath wrote:
well if we put on enough pressure and routinely investigations by IAEA / UN they shouldn't be able to, neither could anyone else help them because that would destroy their reputation in the IAEA. If we could get full room via hard sanctions and control their uranium in/output for the time being all should go well, you don't just develop a nuclear weapon in secrecy as an open state, the soviet times are over.Turquoise wrote:
Do you honestly think they'll stop developing nuclear technology just because we tell them to? We might be able to force them to stop enriching uranium openly, but they're sure to continue in secrecy.dayarath wrote:
I say we should temporarily shut down Iran's uranium enrichment program, Ahmoudinejad is too dangerous to be allowed such technology, especially after operating in secrecy a few times from the IAEA and wanting to blast Israel off the earth. We should only consider granting them this the moment they have a reasonable government with no loudmouthed idiot like Ahmoudinejad, also I do not approve of religiously led countries which treat women like we still live in the middle ages.
There really is no surefire way of ending this program unless we overthrow Iran's government, but that would be a horrible move.
Ahmadinejad is a tool. Nothing more, nothing less. He is a mouthpiece for the ultraconservatives in his country, but the Ayatollah would never allow him to act out some of his crazy rhetoric. The easiest way for me to explain this is that the Ayatollah is a very clever businessman that wields Islam as a weapon with which to manipulate the more religious members of his society. He's not actually interested in spreading Islam so much as he is interested in lessening our influence in the Middle East as well as our ability to interfere with his affairs.The_Mac wrote:
We're not talking about economics, we're talking about Nukes getting in the hands of oppressive leaders. I reiterate: The United States and the West don't want to nuke the world and spread their religion as a theocracy everywhere, can you comprehend that? Or are just brainwashed to rewrite things as they suit you?
Speaking of being manipulated by fear, you seem rather paranoid yourself. Do you honestly believe what this administration tells you about Iran? Do you honestly trust the same government that got us in this mess that Iraq has become? Something you need to realize is that Bush and Ahmadinejad are two sides of the same coin. They both use fear and patriotism to rally their people toward aggressive ideas. You've been thoroughly brainwashed by the neocon ideal if you actually buy into the government's agenda against Iran.The_Mac wrote:
Clearly you've never studied history, all politicians play waiting games, saying things but not wanting to become too aggressive til the time is right. I'm sure you've heard Adolf Hitler; he was able to manipulate the West's fear of fighting, a fear not unlike the type you have exhibited , as well as purporting racist ideas. Then he struck. This nut is waiting for the time to strike while rallying his people around racist and nationalist ideas.
Saudi Arabia has been a business partner of ours for quite some time. They've profitted immensely from our influence in the Middle East, and with that money, they've invested heavily in our economy. As a result, they wield a lot more power over our government than any other country in the region, with the exception of Israel. By the same token, we helped keep the Saudis in power despite domestic turmoil among their people over whether or not the Saudi family really properly represents the interests of their people. If the Saudis were not so friendly to our business interests (and if they didn't invest so much in us), then we'd likely have aided the rise of another aristocracy there, similar to how we undermined Mossadegh in Iran.The_Mac wrote:
That's a load of shit. Saudi Arabia doesn't plan on nuking the West or taking over the world. I don't quite follow what you mean by "playing ball by our rules" are you just being ambiguous to sound intelligent?
For someone who likes to point out the negative aspects of a paranoid delusional fascist, you have many similarities to this man. You seem to have a relentless fear of a nation that has been antagonized and demonized by our government for years. I don't like Iran anymore than you do, but it is utterly foolish to believe that people like the Iranians or the Palestinians want to take over the world. Many Palestinians may want to destroy Israel, but they really don't give a fuck about us. Iran may hate Israel, but they're not stupid enough to attack them.The_Mac wrote:
If you mean, "trying to get nukes" then yes, I would say they're not playing by the rules, especially with Ahmadinejad as "president."
I reiterate:
West: Does not want to take over teh world and nuke everybody.
Iran&Palestine etc.: Does.
Should Iran be given the capacity to have missiles? No. It's that simple, this concession is akin to conceding Adolf Hitler Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia.
My point ousted Mr. "I have a degree in International Politics" when he seemed to suggest that "modern architecture" determines a cultural outlook.
I'll reiterate a point of my own here: Iran wants nukes to prevent us or Israel from invading them. This is a defensive move, not an offensive one.
nopePubic wrote:
GS do Bradleys use the same/similar gunning controls to Strykers?