Pages: 1 2
Topic closed
I Call Shenanigans...CameronPoe wrote:
If you don't like a particular topic of discussion then you can actually decide (of your own free will no less) not to read threads on that topic and you also have the option of not contributing towards said threads.
Thank you, that is all.
Last edited by Major.League.Infidel (2007-12-16 15:31:41)
Someone chiming into a thread to throw abuse at me and at a particular topic. He could quite easily just have not bothered i.e., not attempted a derail. But I've seen it countless other times too by various people. It's just pointless and pathetic.liquidat0r wrote:
I don't like the way you worded that sentence. <insert option one two or three>
1) However, it is, nonetheless, true.
2) Nonetheless, it is, however, true.
3) However: It is true, nonetheless.
What prompted you to post?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-12-16 15:38:13)
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you talking to yourself Cam?
no uCameronPoe wrote:
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you talking to yourself Cam?
Is this going to degenerate into a perpetual cycles of 'no u's...usmarine2005 wrote:
no uCameronPoe wrote:
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you talking to yourself Cam?
spam banusmarine2005 wrote:
no uCameronPoe wrote:
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you talking to yourself Cam?
looooooooooooolCameronPoe wrote:
Someone chiming into a thread to throw abuse at me and at a particular topic. He could quite easily just have not bothered i.e., not attempted a derail. But I've seen it countless other times too by various people. It's just pointless and pathetic.liquidat0r wrote:
I don't like the way you worded that sentence. <insert option one two or three>
1) However, it is, nonetheless, true.
2) Nonetheless, it is, however, true.
3) However: It is true, nonetheless.
What prompted you to post?
I wouldn't have expected that from you, marine.usmarine2005 wrote:
no uCameronPoe wrote:
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you talking to yourself Cam?
Yeah...if you are laughing at what I think you are laughing at.Gooners wrote:
looooooooooooolCameronPoe wrote:
Someone chiming into a thread to throw abuse at me and at a particular topic. He could quite easily just have not bothered i.e., not attempted a derail. But I've seen it countless other times too by various people. It's just pointless and pathetic.liquidat0r wrote:
I don't like the way you worded that sentence. <insert option one two or three>
1) However, it is, nonetheless, true.
2) Nonetheless, it is, however, true.
3) However: It is true, nonetheless.
What prompted you to post?
I couldn't help myselfnukchebi0 wrote:
Yeah...if you are laughing at what I think you are laughing at.Gooners wrote:
looooooooooooolCameronPoe wrote:
Someone chiming into a thread to throw abuse at me and at a particular topic. He could quite easily just have not bothered i.e., not attempted a derail. But I've seen it countless other times too by various people. It's just pointless and pathetic.
Their own medicine?The_Mac wrote:
The OP is a good example of when obnoxious people get handed their own medicine and they start crying because they can't take it.
LDeathUnlimited wrote:
I cannot remember CamPoe derailing a thread
Sting did'nt derail he just shut cam up for a bit.DeathUnlimited wrote:
Their own medicine?The_Mac wrote:
The OP is a good example of when obnoxious people get handed their own medicine and they start crying because they can't take it.
I cannot remember CamPoe derailing a thread
It's cos I kept saying it to him, and he knew that it simply is un-respondable and wins every argument hands down. You'll notice when you experience it first hand.PspRpg-7 wrote:
I wouldn't have expected that from you, marine.usmarine2005 wrote:
no uCameronPoe wrote:
Funnily enough I'm not. Although the OP could apply to you in certain instances I'm quite sure.
no uMek-Izzle wrote:
It's cos I kept saying it to him, and he knew that it simply is un-respondable and wins every argument hands down. You'll notice when you experience it first hand.PspRpg-7 wrote:
I wouldn't have expected that from you, marine.usmarine2005 wrote:
no u
welcome to the world in internet, land of weirdos, home of the dumbassesCameronPoe wrote:
Someone chiming into a thread to throw abuse at me and at a particular topic. He could quite easily just have not bothered i.e., not attempted a derail. But I've seen it countless other times too by various people. It's just pointless and pathetic.
Topic closed
Pages: 1 2